Psychology 409b- November 18, 2006

Level of Toleration Signifies Relationship Model

Unity Model of Marriage Lecture Notes

Section 19

By: Laura C. Moa

 

 

 

Instructions for this activity are found at:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy25/g25-oral1.htm

Instructor: Dr. Leon James

 

Dr. Leon James and Dr. Diane Nahl (2006) Lecture Notes on the Unity Model of Marriage for G25.

Online at: www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy25/409b-g25-lecture-notes.htm.  Reviewing Pages 85-87. Section 19. 

.

I.                   Difference and Similarities between the Dominance Model, the Equity Model, and the Unity Model.  

á        Within these lecture notes, Dr. James presents us with a structured table (Table 8 of the Online Lecture Notes) to reflect the various similarities and dissimilarities when comparing each model. He provides a description and explanation of the various behaviors that are tolerated when operating within in each particular model. The table, itself, lists specific circumstances that occur in marriage in which disagreements are either tolerated or not tolerated by each model. The table consists of four patterns that can be expected. Each pattern is directed by its corresponding model which controls interaction. The four patterns are a categorization of Òhabitual behaviorsÓ governed by each model.   

A.     Evaluation of the Dominance Model

á        When subscribing to the Dominance Model a couple will often tolerate differences and disagreements about a particular issue. There a few instances where differences are not tolerated, however, this, in some cases, may just a manipulation of the manÕs control. In these instances, if differences arise, it is the man who over-rules the female and makes the decision for her. It is he who will not tolerate differences in these specific circumstances forcing his wife to align with him.  

1.      Issues in Which Disagreement is Tolerated

a.       ÒWhat restaurant to go to.Ó

b.      What to order to eat.

c.       What movie they will watch.

d.      How each partner dresses on particular outings

e.       ÒWhat friends to socialize with.Ó

f.        ÒHow to deal with money or investmentsÓ

g.       Dealing with family

h.       Political views (ÒWhat party to supportÓ)

i.         Sense of Humor (ÒWhat they laugh atÓ)

j.        ÒWhat they feel sentimental aboutÓ

2.      Issues in Which Disagreement is Not Tolerated

a.       ÒHow to deal with childrenÓ

b.      ÒWhere to liveÓ

c.       ÒPhysical abuse or violenceÓ

3.      Within the dominance model it is to be expected that toleration is lax concerning disagreements between partners. This is due to the basic premise of male domination, which is something that the model, itself, substantiates.

4.      ÒSeparatenessÓ is an automatic stipulation that is adjacent to domination. Therefore, it is present when a couple is operating in the dominance model. Because the man is constantly trying to assert independence and control, he is automatically creating a rift between his wife and himself. He is preventing them from conjoining by allowing them to function on separate pages.

5.      This separateness is what allows them to tolerate differences and reject closeness.

B.     Evaluation of the Equity Model

á        According to this model it is a common value for a couple to Òagree to disagreeÓ when considering specific ideas, thoughts, values, or decisions. As the table reflects, there are even fewer instances in the equity model when a couple will refuse to tolerate differences or disagreements than that of the dominance model. Differences are often welcomed because the relationship is based on intellect and equal distribution. Within this model, tolerance of differences and disagreements are acceptable in order that a sense of Òpeace and comfortÓ will be attained. However, this behavior, although it may create comfortableness, it nonetheless hinders unity.

1.      Issues in Which Disagreement is Tolerated

a.       ÒWhat restaurant to go to.Ó

b.      What to order to eat.

c.       What movie they will watch.

d.      How each partner dresses on particular outings

e.       ÒWhat friends to socialize with.Ó

f.        ÒHow to deal with money or investmentsÓ

g.       ÒHow to deal with the childrenÓ

h.       ÒWhere to liveÓ

i.         Dealing with family

j.        Political views (ÒWhat party to supportÓ)

k.      Sense of Humor (ÒWhat they laugh atÓ)

2.      Issues in Which Disagreement is Not Tolerated

a.       ÒPhysical abuse or violenceÓ

      3.   The reason why there are so many instances in this model where couples tolerates disagreements is due to the fact that couples will uphold this idea to Òagree to disagreeÓ with the motivation that both parties are respecting each others differences. However, this is an anti- unity value, and is degrading to unity. This idea of Òagreeing to disagreeÓ is value that is masqueraded as a fair way to compromise or a way to achieve mutual respect. However, it is actually a tactic of the dominance model because it hinders conjoinment and encourages the husband to continue to assert independence.

C.     Evaluation of the Unity Model

á        According to the table, this model does not allow for disagreements between partners. There are rare occasions in which differences (not disagreements) are allowed to exist within the relationships. However, these instances only arise in situations when a partner, more than likely a man, must respect his or her spouse for the way they are feeling and the emotions they have in order to create harmony, unity, and show love.

1.      Issues in Which Disagreement is Tolerated

a.       Sense of Humor (ÒWhat they laugh atÓ)

b.      ÒWhat they feel sentimental aboutÓ

2.      Issues in Which Disagreement is Not Tolerated

a.       ÒWhat restaurant to go to.Ó

b.      What to order to eat.

c.       What movie they will watch.

d.      How each partner dresses on particular outings

e.       ÒWhat friends to socialize with.Ó

f.        ÒHow to deal with money or investmentsÓ

g.       ÒHow to deal with the childrenÓ

h.       ÒWhere to liveÓ

i.         Dealing with family

j.        Political views (ÒWhat party to supportÓ)

k.      ÒPhysical abuse or violenceÓ

3.      The reason that the unity model does not tolerate disagreements is because both parties are working toward conjoining together as one entity.

4.      This conjoinment means that there cannot be any separateness, space, distance, or disagreements between them.

5.      When a couple detects a disagreement or is misaligned in any way, it is distressing for them because this poses as a threat to spiritual, emotional, and mental unity and intimacy. For this reason, it is imperative that the disagreement be discussed and extinguished right away to avoid creating distance between the couple.

6.      To do this, the husband must relinquish control and ally his thoughts and feelings with that of his wifeÕs. He must reject is innate instinct to disagree with her. By doing this he is showing her that he has complete trust and faith in her decisions and feelings.

7.      Relinquishing control is one of the best decisions a man can make for his relationship. This is because a wife is automatically trying to conjoin and will therefore make decisions for the best of the relationship while also taking into consideration the feelings of her husband.

8.      When operating in the unity model, it is possible for a couple to act in an inconsistent way which can throw off the basic pattern reflected in the table. Nevertheless, it is possible to recover. Men might occasionally fail in overcoming his instinctual cues to dominate and disagree; in this instance he must realize his fault.

9.      He should automatically apologize; make things right, and realign. He can do this by showing sincere guilt. In this way he can reconstruct the pattern, allowing harmony to manifest itself once again in their relationship.

10.  After witnessing his effort, the wife will willingly express forgiveness, compassion, and love, accepting his mistake as a Òmomentary lapseÓ in judgment.

 

Relates Links:

            1). Making Decisions Together

            This site, written by authors Sheri Stritof and Bob Stritof, discusses the importance of making decisions together in marriage. The authors suggest that all important decisions should be made together. They outline a number of important decisions that they feel should definitely be made as a team, like decisions on parenting, finances, household chores, future plans, and how to spend free time. The StritofÕs say the Òmaking decisions should be a shared responsibility.Ó They assert that if the responsibility is not shared then it can cause unhappiness in marriage. Sheri and Bob discuss several characteristics of successful marriages which they feel are related to decision making, characteristics like sincerity, compromise, and concern for your partners wishes. I chose this concept because I felt it related to the topic of tolerating differences and disagreements. Disagreements often occur because decisions are made separately. This site reminded me of Dr. JamesÕ concepts about conjoining with oneÕs spouse. I feel that this site might reflect a model similar to that of the equity model or possibly contain parts of the unity model as well.           

http://marriage.about.com/od/loveisadecision/a/decisions.htm

            2). The Individual Me.

            This particular site was written by a woman named Chelsea Badeau. In this site she discusses her feelings about the importance of individuality, independence, and separateness. She talks about the harmful effects that can come from completely devoting your heart and life to a relationship that might end up failing. She tells a story about a friend who chose to enter a relationship in which she isolated herself from others in order to be with that person. This eventually caused her to push away her friends, neglect her family, and abandon her hobbies, interests, and dreams only to later be heartbroken when they broke up. I chose this site because I thought it was an interesting contrast to the concepts that Dr. James has taught us in this section. I feel that the relationship she describes in this site was unhealthy, not because the women was devoted, but because she was in a dominant relationship. Badeau writes, ÒBalance and moderation are crucial to mental, emotional, and physical health. Too much of anything is never good. You should never completely change your life and stop doing the things you enjoy just to please your mate.Ó She asserts that being absorbed in a relationship can cause one to lose their separate individual self. However, I donÕt think that this change is a bad thing. I think that Chelsea is subscribing to the idea of the equity model, or even the dominance model. However this idea of separation hinders unity.

http://www.comcast.net/relationships/chelsea/index.jsp?articleId=2

            3). Separation is Never Pleasing to God.

            This is a site that gives a Christian perspective on separation. It gives various different examples of Bible scripture that discuss the meaning of marriage and commitment. It also discusses the idea of eternal togetherness by saying that, Òwhen a couple enters into the covenant of marriage, the Bible tells us that God joins them together in one flesh.Ó In a way, this particular statement is promoting Dr. James concept of unity and conjoinment. According to the unity model, two partners should never be separate but should attempt to become one, aligning in every action, reaction, thought, and motivation. I chose this site because I felt it added a good variety to my choice of sources. I thought that it was a good example of a source which promotes the concepts I learned in this section. It aligns with the unity modelÕs idea on intolerance of disagreements or differences.

http://www.gotquestions.org/trial-separation-marriage.html

 

 

My Home Page: www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/409bf2006/moa/moa-home.htm

 

Class Home Page:http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy25/classhome-g25.htm