“The Spirit of the Unity Model”

This is Report 6

Author:

Caitlin Botelho

Co Authors:

Allison Ozaki

Xuying Zhang

Psy 409b, Spring 2008, Generation 27

Dr. Leon James, Instructor, University of Hawaii

Link to class home page

 

Section 1: Lecture Content

(By: Xuying Zhang)

Lecture Notes 11

 

There are two versions of psychology.  One is the negative bias which leads to materialism and non-theistic and the other is one is the positive bias which leads to dualism and theistic.  The unity model of marriage is theistic and it’s based on Swedenborg’s writings.  Dualism perspective focuses on the connection between this material life that we are living in and the spiritual life after we die.  According to Swedenborg, he had interviewed many spiritual couples in heaven whom had lived thousands of years ago.  The spiritual couples appeared to be ONE.  They were forever together with their young heart and happier each day than the previous day.

 

Swedenborg was gifted to visit both the spiritual heaven and hell.  He reported that there are other people in heaven and hell; we are not going to be alone.  After we die, our physical form (our bodies) will disappear and then we will either go to live in the spiritual heaven or spiritual hell from there.  We all have spiritual body within our physical body.  Our sensations, feelings, ideas are not in our physical body, but in our spiritual body.  The spiritual body already exists in our physical body when we were born. 

 

Just like we have physical things surrounds our physical body, there are spiritual things surrounds our spiritual body.  See diagram below:

 

 

 

 

 

 


                                            Heat    light

 

 

 

 


                                                G      T

                                                        

                                              

                                                A      C

 

In the Spiritual world, there is a spiritual sun just like the physical sun which provide light and heat for lives in heaven.  G stands for good.  T stands for Truth.  A means affective and C means cognitive.  Affective and Cognitive can only to be reached through Good and Truth. 

 

Personal Opinion:

 

This is the first time I heard about the positive and negative bias in psychology.  I don’t want to believe that the science I have been learning through all these years of education is just negative bias.  But I do think it is possible that Swedenborg’s reports are true and he did go to the spiritual heaven and interview these couples.  It is also possible that Swedenborg was given by God and he had a spiritual experimental laboratory to see and report the spiritual heaven on earth.  Because I’m still living in a physical world and cannot see what is going to happen after I die, so anything is possible.  I would like to adopt the idea that there is a spiritual heaven and wish that I can go and live there with my beloved one forever and ever.

 

          The unity model of marriage is based on dualist approach in the positive bias of science. 

 

When two people met and fall in love with each other, they will automatically start a spiritual process to become mentally intimate.  Their mental organs learn how to function with each other and they become interdependent in their mental organs.  Relationships that are in male dominance and equity level cannot achieve this interdependence of each other because they are in the lower layers of their mental organs.  Only couples who are at the unity phase could reach this inmost mental organ called heavenly. 

 

Individuals who did not find a soul mate when they were alive will be given the opportunity to find one and conjoin with that person in the after life.  This is the conjugial love by which they desire to be interdependent affectively more than being independent which defined as angel by Swedenborg.  He interviewed many angel couples and the unity model is based on the characteristics he found in their relationship.  They were always conjoined with each other no matter where they were. 

 

Personal Opinion:

 

When I fell in love with my boyfriend, I felt that he was trying to conjoin with me constantly.  He wanted to know where I was and what I was doing, so on and so forth.  But because of my background, I was a little rejected to this.  I didn’t like the idea that he ask for my opinions about everything.  I was not use to that.  But now, as I started to learn more about the unity model, I started to change myself.  I think it’s a good idea that he wants to communicate with me constantly which means he wants to conjoin with me which will lead us to a happier relationship.  

 

 

When we die, within a few hours, we will awaken in the spiritual world and live there in eternity.  The life of immortality is either in the heavens of our mind or in the hells of our mind.  It all depends on ourselves that which traits we want to hold on to in this physical life.  If we cannot let go the hellish traits then after this life, we are going to end up in the spiritual hell.  Swedenborg also visited the spiritual hell where he described as couples do not love each other, constantly fighting over power and abuse each other. 

 

Dr. James started to experience and changed his life after reading Swedenborg’s reports.  He changed his attitude toward his wife.  He used to be at the equity level and sometimes male dominance level.  He wanted to keep his independence and didn’t want to conjoin with his wife.  His wife was experiencing loneliness of her mental intimacy.  After Dr. James through away all of his hellish traits, he could start conjoin with his wife and their marriage had improved tremendously. 

 

 Personal Opinion:

 

After I read this section, I feel that I don’t know if I’m going to end up in heaven and live their happily ever after with my beloved one, but I definitely don’t want to end up in hell forever.  I don’t want to fight with someone constantly for power or anything.  I want everything in harmony and peaceful.  I was also very interesting to know more about how Dr. James changed himself and improved their marriage. 

 

There are three important benefits for women in the unity model of marriage:

n      It allows women to see more clearly where and why men are resistant in the relationship.

n      Women can see more clearly how the man’s resistant to mental intimacy affects the women’s own peace and self-confidence.

n      Women can see more clearly where they can use rationality to apply mental pressure towards the man so that he can become more motivated to get rid of his resistance to conjunction and intimacy.

 

In the process of unification, woman’s role is central and needs to be understood by the men, so he can cooperate with her.  Man’s role is not to weaken the woman’s self-confidence.  Man needs to give the woman the right and propriety of her affective interventions.  He must control his resistance, do not ever attack or punish the woman for doing her job which is saving him from falling into hell.  When woman try help her man, she may be appeared to be angry at him.  It looks like she is angry at him, but in fact that’s not anger, it’s zeal.  Anger is a hellish trait.  Zeal is a heavenly trait.  Real man remains calm and understands her feelings during her explosive reactions of zeal.  The man can also help his wife by giving up more of his power and tell her about his feelings, plans, expectations, etc.  If he allows his wife to influence him, then he is one step closer to their intimacy and eternal marriage.

 

Women are not expecting the men can stop their anti-unity values and habits immediately.  They are smart enough to know that this process will take time and effort to accomplish. 

 

 Personal Opinion:

 

I do agree that men should be supportive to their woman in any situation at anytime.  Women are very sensitive especially when it comes to love, romance, and relationship.  Women need to be supported by their men because that’s person she is planning to spend the rest of her life and even eternally with.  If the man is not on her side, then she would feel there is nobody on her side, not even her loved one.  She will lose her confidence about everything. 

 

In the unity model the definition of spiritual marriage depends on the mental anatomy of men and women.  A couple has to have a natural marriage, and then they could enter the spiritual marriage where their minds are also conjoined which is called the spiritual mind.  Therefore, natural marriages are in the natural mind, and spiritual marriages are in the spiritual mind.

 

Outside of the unity model, spiritual marriage means something completely different.  In fact, it is opposite as spiritual marriage in the unity model.  People often refer spiritual marriage to “love without sex”, but according to Swedenborg, couples living in heaven are all enjoying their conjugial love and marital sexuality. 

 

 Personal Opinion:

 

This section of the lecture notes gives a different point of view of spiritual marriage which is opposite as the meaning we use to refer.  Spiritual marriage is in the spiritual world.  I kind of want to know what the spiritual world is look like.  For now it’s hard for me to picture the spiritual world. 

 

Lecture Notes 19

 

Unity—when wife and husband affective intimacy.  They are in a spiritual marriage which last in eternity.  They are conjoint with each other. 

 

Anti-Unity Values – anti-intimacy between partners.  The husband resist to have intimacy with the wife.

 

Some Unity value examples:

  1. married before living together
  2. having children after married
  3. consider each others’ value, beliefs, religion, etc
  4. partner is more important than anyone else
  5. do not flirt with other people
  6. having same interests and shared activities
  7. do not leave partner and go other with other friends
  8. never verbally, mentally, physically abuse each other
  9. do not interrupt each other when they talk
  10. always support each other’s decisions
  11. never participate in girls only or boys only activities
  12. never make it looks like what women think or say is less important
  13. always tell each other their feelings
  14. always try to conjoint with each other
  15. etc. etc

 

Some AUV examples:

  1. living together without married
  2. having children without married
  3. making each other jealous on purpose
  4. put same sex friends place ahead of their partner
  5. flirting with other men or women
  6. keeping secretes from each other
  7. making it look normal for a man to abuse women
  8. participating in boy only or girl only activities
  9. making it look like what women say is less important
  10. want to be independent
  11. not trying to conjoint with each other
  12. promoting the idea that men are more rational than women
  13. accepting the idea that it’s okay to “agree to disagree”
  14. infidelity for any reason
  15. etc. etc

 

Personal Opinion:

 

I have been, or maybe we all have been seeing these AUV ideas through media.  I think my generation is the generation learns so much from media.  For example, how girls are dress themselves.  They adopt the idea that slutty is sexy.  Through the MTVs, online games, TV shows, we have been given the idea of sexy which is the male’s perspective of sexy.  Men like to see women to show as much of their bodies as possible, so we ended up seeing beautiful women with as little cloths as possible on television and labeled as “sexy”.  We all know how much the media is influencing our lives, so we ended up seeing all these “sexy” girls on the street.  I personally believe that sexy is something comes from inside, not the physical body form.

 

 

Section 2: Team Presentation on Readings

(By: Caitlin Botelho)

Generation 23 Reports

 

The two reports that I examined from Generation 23 were from Jennifer Funtanilla and Emilee Patinio.  Between the two of them, questions (from Dr. James) number 1, 2, 3, 11, and 14 were covered.

 

Jennifer Funtanilla

Q 1: It is sometimes wrongly asserted that men have less feelings than women. Show that this is not true by discussing the threefold self and the role of the affective in relation to the cognitive and sensorimotor.

A: Men and women are able to form a bond if they unite at all three levels of the self; the sensorimotor self involves the overt behavior between men and women and the cognitive self involves the thinking and reasoning of each partner in the relationship. Men have the same amount of emotions and feelings as women but they are not as aware of them nor do they want to take the time to examine their feelings.  Women, on the other hand, are more in tune with what they are feeling because they spend time figuring that out.  Jennifer brings up a movie in which the girl cried the whole time and the boy did not cry at all.  The girl was stunned that they did not share the same feelings, but in reality they did, but they expressed them very differently. 

Q14: (a) Describe the unity model in relation to the eternal significance of marriage and the mental state of the couple’s three fold self.  (b) Describe any resistance you have experienced regarding the unity model, (i) the idea of unity as a higher state of life than all others, (ii)  the eternal significance of marriage, (iii) Swedenborg’s observations of marriages in heaven.  (c)  Describe the reactions of friends when you tell them about the unity model of marriages in heaven.  (d)  How has the unity model influenced your thinking?  What benefit do you think class members acquire when studying the unity model in this course?

A:  The unity model is based on conjugial love which is a spiritual connection between a man and woman that exists only when the couple has conjoined at all three levels of the self.  When this happens, the couple is able to be with each other for eternity in the spiritual world.  A couple must have mental intimacy to reach the unity model of marriage: men need to recognize the ways in which they add to their wives mental distress.  If a man is able to do this, he will be able to achieve unity with his wife through the affective self. 

Jennifer felt no resistance towards the idea of unity as a higher state of life than all others because she believes that one can connect with another at all three levels of the self.  She has never experienced it for herself but she doesn’t think any other experience could top that.  Jennifer also had no strong objections to the idea of the eternal significance of marriage because she believes there is life after death.  However, she feels that if a husband and wife have reached the unity model but the husband dies and the wife remarries she WILL be able to love her husband but not the same way as her first.  With Swedeborg’s observation of marriages, Jennifer felt like it was far fetched and thinks that it is somewhat hard to believe.  She is skeptical on that part. 

The unity model of marriage has opened Jennifer’s eyes to the wonderful experiences that men and women could have together.  She thinks the women in her class that were married at the time are the ones that benefited the most from taking this class because they were able to evaluate their relationships and see which level they were on. 

Emilee Patinio

Q2: Contrast the four views of gender relationships expressed by Tanned in Gender issues, Schlessinger in The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands, Coleman in The Lazy Husband and James in the Unity Model of Marriage. (b) Your analysis should also include a chart or table that shows the differences between the four books in a systematic way. 

A: Deborah Tannen views gender relationships along the lines of dominance and equity.  She talks about the different ways that men and women communicate with each other (linguistic relationship).  Dr. Schlessinger depicts relationships from the male dominance model.  According to her, women should be happy that men provide for them and cater to his needs.  Joshua Coleman tries to aim towards the equity model and believes that women need to try to understand men more.  Finally Dr. Swedenborg relates to the unity model of marriage.  He believes that marriage is till eternity and does not end at death.  He had the ability to go into his spiritual mind to see how others lived their life with conjugial love.

 

 

Man vs. Woman

Conjugal vs. Conjugial

Method of Solving Arguments

Model of Marriage

Tannen

Man

Conjugal

Dominant wins

Dominance/Equity

Schlessinger

Man

Conjugal

Man is right

Dominance

Coleman

Man=Woman

Conjugal

Both listen to the others views

Equity/Dominance

Swedenborg

Woman=Man

Conjugial

Man does what he can to make wife happy

Unity

Q3: A husband and wife seem to get along real well together, enjoying the same activities, having fun, being popular with friends, etc. Then they have a fight over some disagreement and they show disrespect and hatred for each other.  (a) Explain why this turnabout can happen and what is its cause. Be sure to use some aspect of the theory given in the Lecture Notes. (b) Discuss how married partners can reverse this flip-flop cycle so that it never occurs again. In your explanation be sure to apply the unity model, the threefold self, and the conjoint self, as explained in the Lecture Notes.  (d) The unity model says that men are resistant to mental intimacy and to conjugial unity. Collect data to either confirm or disconfirm this prediction. Interview several women of varying ages (to the extent possible). Make up a checklist consisting of 10 to 20 items that highlight what the women have said about their experiences with men's resistance to intimacy. Discuss the list and what it can be used for. 

A: Husbands and wives do not have trouble enjoying the same activities; this is why they are a couple to begin with.  When the couple becomes closer cognitively and affectively, this turnabout can happen. They lack to cognitive capacity to think like their partner.  Married couples can reverse this process by following the unity model of marriage.  Dr. James says that the perfection of unity in a marriage increases through differentiation and reciprocity of behavior in the threefold self of both partners and it is a spiritual bond that lasts forever. 

Below is the table that Emilee uses to show what women have said about men’s resistance to intimacy.

                                 Woman 1        Woman 2         Woman 3        Woman 4

Do you and Your Partner Fight Often?

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Does your guy Usually see things your way when resolving the issue?

NO

NO

Sometimes

Yes

Is your guy mentally intimate as well as physically?

NO

No

If it comes with a reward, or only because I reinforce it

If I ask him a question he’ll give me an honest answer

Have you and your Partner talked about being together for eternity?

No

No

No

Jokingly

Do you think your partner would willingly accept conjugial love?

NO

No

I could see him practicing some of its specs but not totally committing to it.

He treats me in that manner on his own, it might take him time but its possible

Q11: Explain what has been discussed in class and the Lecture Notes as "sexual blackmail." Describe the development of your thinking regarding this concept, from initial reaction to now. Collect some data on how others you know react to this concept when you explain it to them. How do you interpret their reactions and comments? 

A: Sexual blackmail is a “rule” stating that a woman should give her husband sex whenever he wants it, making the wife feel like a slave.  When Emilee first heard about sexual blackmail she thought it was degrading towards women and now feels that it is wrong and should never be tolerated.  The people she talked to about sexual blackmail also felt like it was ridiculous and that sex shouldn’t be treated as a reward or punishment which she completely agrees with.  Emilee points out that Dr. Schlessinger’s view on the wife giving the husband sex whenever he wants it has some mental abuse on the woman.

Personal Opinion

While I was reading these past reports, I was reminded of everything that we have learned in class thus far.  It was very interesting to read other people’s opinions on this class and what it is taught them.  I agree with Jennifer for the most part on that I think the unity model of marriage is a great thing to strive for and I am glad that I was opened to a new learning experience.  As for Swedenborg, I too am a little skeptical that he was able to go back and forth between the spiritual world and the natural world.  I am one of those people that does not believe that people are capable of doing that, but I guess I just have to experience it to believe it. 

I enjoyed reading Emilee’s views on the different authors of this class.  I agree completely with her and her opinions on each author.  I really enjoyed being able to read these different books in class and to get a different opinion from each person.  I will say that I enjoyed reading Joshua Coleman’s book The Lazy Husband the best because it seemed like he was favoring the women more, at least towards the equity model. 

Sexual blackmail…I think everyone that hears about sexual blackmail in the terms of this class agrees that it is devastating and morally wrong.  As a woman, I would hate the feeling of being sexually blackmailed.  It is so sad to know that Dr. Laura Schlessinger, a WOMAN, basically promotes the idea of sexual blackmail.  I would have thought that all women would “band together” to avoid things like that.  I believe that all people should be taught about sexual blackmail, to possibly help the problem, since it goes on quite often in many relationships. 

 

Section 3: Team Presentation on Exercises

(By: Allison Ozaki)

Exercise 16c.1

 

          (a) Summarize the main ideas presented by the team.

The main idea presented by the team was the basis for conjunctive conversation. They explained the four rules for conjugial conversation and described what happened when they asked their friends about the approached. They also discussed a video about a boy and a girl going out on a date and the differences in the preparation for it. After, they also explained their friend’s reaction to the description of the video.

            (b) Describe what they did and how they interpreted it.

The team asked their friends about how they felt about the four rules and the video. They interpreted their reactions to the limited knowledge of the Unity Model of Marriage. Also, they are in natural relationships and do not know yet about conjugial marriages.

            (c) Describe some of the ideas that needed a better justification or greater amplification.

The ideas they present were good and well explained. They could have given more depth into explanations for their friend’s reaction to the four rules and to the video, but overall I thought the presentation was satisfactory.


            (d) What was the success of the approach they used?

The team had mixed results. When they explained the four rules and video to their women friends, they responded positively and said the video was pretty accurate. But their male friends were less receptive. Some went on to say that the men were “whipped” or had no backbone and said that the video exaggerated the behaviors of men.

            (e) What improvements are needed in the procedures or in the instructions?

The procedures and instructions were pretty descriptive and easy to understand. I see no need for improvements.

            (f) What are the limitations of these types of exercises?

The limitations of these types of exercises were the people the team asked. They had no understanding of what the Unity Model of Marriage was and therefore could not have given any answer except the one expected.

            (g) Describe what happened when you did some of the steps of the exercises.

My results were representative of the team’s results. The women were much more receptive and the men were less enthusiastic about following the suggestions in the steps. The men also looked at the examples as weak and whipped, not giving them much respect, but this is due to the lack of understanding of the Unity Model of Marriage. The people I asked also had a hard time.

 

Section 4: Annotated Web Links

(By: All students)

1.       Talk With Eachother, Not At Eachother

          http://marriage.about.com/od/communicationtips/a/conversation.htm

When a couple reaches the point of not having anything to say to one another, their marriage is in serious trouble. Here are some tips on why conversation in a marriage is so essential, and topics to talk about.

2.       Kludging the Marriage Conversation

          http://www.marriageconversation.com/read/articles/?page=Kludging_the_Marriage_Conversation.html

How to deter divorce by good conversations. Conversations by married couples about divorce to show how to avoid it.

3.       Phases for Miscommunication

          http://www.mattkramermediation.com/pages/commun.html

Examples of miscommunication and examples of good communication by married couples.

4.       Three Ways Men Resist Change

          http://marriage.suite101.com/article.cfm/when_women_try_to_change_men

A few ways men resist change in relationships and how women can learn to “deal with men’s faults.”

5.       Gender Differences in Marriage

          http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=225932938175802672

This man from the Word of Life Institute talks about the differences between men and women in marriage.

6.       Relationships and Emotional Intelligence

          http://www.helpguide.org/mental/improve_relationships.htm

Learn the five emotional intelligence skills necessary to build a great relationship and help fix possible relationship problems.

7.       Spiritual Marriage, The Purpose of Marriage

     http://alternativespirituality.suite101.com/article.cfm/spiritual_marriage

This article answers questions like “What is the true purpose of marriage?” “Is happiness the most important reason to marry?” “Or to avoid loneliness?” “How can a marriage become a spiritual one?”

8.       Four Keys to a Spiritual Marriage

     http://www.iloveulove.com/spirituality/spiritualmarriage.htm

This article talks about how to have a successful spiritual marriage, however this is a different spiritual marriage than the one examined in this class.  This spiritual marriage refers to God in one’s marriage.

9.       Spiritual Marriage

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_marriage

This website gives the definition of spiritual marriage which is the opposite of our definition of spiritual marriage in this class.

10.      Creating a Spiritual Marriage

     http://www.susankramer.com/SpiritualMarriage.html

This website gives great detail of how to create a spiritual marriage with your spouse.