Communication is Key

Report 3

J. Garcia, B.Nacapoy, A.Valenzuela

Psy 409b, Spring 2008, Generation 27

Dr. Leon James, Instructor, University of Hawaii

Class Home Page

Garcia Home Page

 

 

Section 1 Lecture

A. Valenzuela

 

Basic Ennead Chart of Interaction

The Basic Ennead Matrix: The Nine Zones in Marriage
(READ TABLE FROM BOTTOM UP)

PHASE THAT GOVERNS THEIR INTERACTIONS

THREEFO0LD SELF

SENSORIMOTOR
(external)
S

COGNITIVE
(internal)
C

AFFECTIVE
(inmost)
A

UNITY
conjunctive interactions

7

8

9

EQUITY
negotiated interactions

4

5

6

MALE DOMINANCE
coercive
interactions

1

2

3

 

            The ennead chart displays the nine subsequent stages/steps to achieve unity in marriage.  The chart shows that to reach the unity model cells 7-9 are not attainable without going through the preceding equity and dominance phases.  However, a couple can interact through any of the nine zones depending on the situation.

 

            Notice that the intersecting cells are made when the individual tracks events of the threefold self of the wife and husband on their way to unity.  It’s important to understand the Basic Ennead Chart of Interaction because it can be used or considered in ones everyday thinking about relationships, his or her own, or those of others.

 

            In the chart the columns represent the threefold self and the rows represent the models or philosophies of the partner’s interactions.  They are conceptualized in relation to each other by the chart.  By referring to the interactions and philosophies as models, it is meant that they are models in the way that the individual’s habits and attitudes operate on a subconscious level learned and standardized by culture and socialization models.  This mental standardization is based on mental scripts drawn from group practices and social practices that people follow.  It creates an “averageness” of these kinds of social interactions.

 

            In psychology there is an expression called the social desirability effect in interviews that says an individual avoids giving socially undesirable answers and gives answers that would be more acceptable if not preferable.  People try hard to hide or avoid becoming aware of their bad habits and mental practices and are naturally unwilling to change themselves.  People love themselves for who they and are governed by their loves so it makes sense that they would stand up for their ideas, for themselves, and surround themselves with friends who accept them for who they are.  Now it should be more visible to see how the interactions of married couples placed in the cells 1 through 6 are learned behaviors of the threefold self.

 

Couples within a community or family are social copies or typical "models" of each other, even though each couple varies.  There is a main system of group practices shared by all married threefold-selves in a community and inside that system there are sub-systems that characterize social varieties of interactions between married partners.  Husbands rely on the traditional coercive power and expectations to oblige their wife to be submissive, without consideration of her feelings.

 

The husband who behaves in the dominance phase is closest to his wife in the sensorimotor zone of interaction in cell 1.  While the wife is being physically intimate with her husband, simultaneously she is not being intimate with him at the cognitive and affective zones 2 and 3.  This guide is "coercive" because the wife does not have the opportunity to share her thoughts and feelings about the sensorimotor obedience.  She gets punished in various ways such as physical threat, verbal abuse, or being abandoned, if she does not behave as expected and that is why she is motivated to behave accordingly. The male dominance phase depends on sensorimotor coercion of women and suppression of her cognitive and affective behavior, unless allowed.

 

It is the wife or girlfriend has the objective view because she reacts to everything he does or fails to do.  That’s why a rational and gentlemanly thing for a man to do is to listen to the wife, instead of rejecting and disagreeing with what she says.

 

When a man says “I love you” to a woman he takes on a chain of obligations.  If he tries to undergo these obligations he is a gallant man, a real man, a contended man trying to move to a spiritual marriage and the women cannot resist.

 

When partners relate to each other through negotiation, their intimacy is focused on the cognitive level.  When the intimacy is focused on the cognitive, zone 5, the wife may share an equal role since she is a smart at negotiator wants to be fair in negotiation processes, the man can still revert to the male dominance phase whenever he feels like it.  Then, there is not much the female can do because the man has broken cognitive intimacy, breaking their friendship. They have reverted to the male dominance phase where she may feel sexually blackmailed.

If the man changes and sticks to the equity phase the couple can grow toward being fully conjoined and intimate in their threefold self. If the husband adopts a new way of interacting with his wife, and the new way has to do with his thinking about eternity as a couple, they can under the equity phases, zones 4, 5, 6.

 

In the unity model of interaction zones 7throught 9, the husband allows the wife's feminine intelligence to lead his own intelligence whenever they encounter a disagreement with each other.  This behavior is called affective intimacy emphasized in zone 9.  He will be able to stay in the unity model for more of his interactions with his wife if he practices conjunctive behaviors.  However, this behavior form the man must be voluntary.  It arises when he becomes spiritually enlightened from the wish to conjoin eternally to his wife.  The man would then be willing to let go of his independent self for the conjoint self.  The new conjoint self means he no longer is an independent person or human being.

 

By first achieving cognitive conjunction he will find out how she thinks about things, what she prefers, and if he wants to make her happy, he will be able to do what she wants. Only then will he be her soul-mate, her and unified at all three levels of human conjunction.

 

The couple can develop momentous benefits throughout the lengthy process of maturing their conjoint self.

 

This romantic love and inmost confidence they have with each other is felt as a spiritual conjunction or love.  This experience opens their spiritual rationality and intelligence, and changes their mental anatomy and physiology.  Men and women in love spend some of their interactions in the unity zones.  The husband is romantic, friendly, attentive, generous, and is careful to inhibit some of his grosser traits and habits.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

Section 2 Readings

J. Garcia

 

Lecture Notes 16c:  Conversational Rules for Husbands in Conjugial Interactions

            Conjugial love can best be described as innermost friendship.  In a Unity Model marriage, it is not only important to love each other; you must also like each other. The key to any friendship and a good relationship is communication. Brandi presented the rules for husbands in conjugial interactions for us in the first part of the oral report on readings.  I will summarize these rules, but they can also be found in the lecture notes by Dr. James at the above link. 

 

Rule One: be reactive and friendly while your wife is talking.  A tip given for the husbands is to act like you are always on your first date. At that point in the relationship the man is trying to convince the woman he is right for her, and is very attentive. If he pretends to be on a permanent date with his wife he will be an active listener.

 

Rule Two:  deny himself the right to express disagreement with her.  A man does this at work with his superior, yet he resists it at home with his wife. It is often a male dominance double standard, to expect the wife to give up what she wants while the male refuses to do the same.

 

Rule Three: create an atmosphere for open conversation.  The husband should be willing to let the wife jump topics and say whatever is on her mind, without feeling oppressed.  She should feel free and safe.

 

Rule Four: use the conversation as a method of enhancing her mood, of making her feel young in heart and stimulated in mind. A female loves to hear what the male thinks when he is using his rational mind. Conversation shows how and what we think, a husband needs to value what a wife has to say. As long as the husband is trying, a wife will be patient and forgiving.

 

            I agreed with Brandi’s personal reaction to these rules: that a husband should take into consideration a wife’s thoughts and feelings before speaking and sharing his thoughts. I also believe a wife should be willing to do the same, and see a husband’s point of view too.  Dr. James shared that he tries to “express his views without denying hers.”  The ultimate goal of the husband is to rationally express his views.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

 

Gender & Discourse by Deborah Tannen

Chapter 4 pages 137-173

Conversational Strategy and Metastrategy in a Pragmatic Theory

The Example of Scenes from a Marriage

 

            In this chapter Tannen and a former professor of hers, Robin Lakoff, look at conversational differences between males and females using the play Scenes from a Marriage by Bergman.  In her oral presentation, Caitlin summarized this chapter while looking for the use or absence of the four rules discussed in the lecture notes by Dr. James, and above.  Tannen and Lakoff first discuss three communicative styles used by the characters in the play, Mariann and Johan.  These styles are distance, difference, camaraderie and clarity.  Marianne uses a combination of difference and camaraderie, often talking and acting childish, and asking a string of questions without giving adequate time for a response.  Johan uses distance, via sarcasm, irony, generalization and abstraction.  There is great disjunction in this relationship, with Johan often putting his needs before Marianne’s. There are examples of this disjunction throughout all six scenes of the play.  The following is just a couple of examples Caitlin shared with us.

 

            In Scene Two Marianne says to Johan “One must speak out, however painful it is. Don’t you think?” to which he replies, “Hell, yes. What time is it?” This breaks rule one, he is not being reactive and friendly, he is not actively responding to her question.  By asking what time it is, he is changing the subject and not participating in the conversation she is trying to have.

 

            Johan often asks Marianne questions that make her angry. This breaks rule four, he is not focusing on his wife and enhancing her mood with conversation, he is in fact doing just the opposite, and making her mood worse by making her angry.

 

            The authors also introduce us to pragmatic synonymy, homonymy, and identity. Their use of these can be seen throughout the play.

 

pragmatic synonymy- use of different linguistic devices to achieve similar ends

Example: Johan uses shares his opinions and is judgmental, while Marianne uses avoidance to keep from addressing the real issues in their marriage. 

 

pragmatic homonymy- use similar linguistic devices to achieve different ends

Example: both characters use long streams of questions; however Marianne uses this device to avoid answers, while Johan uses the questions to taunt Marianne.

 

pragmatic identity- use the same device toward the same end

Example: in one scene after discussing divorce, they both decide to just go to sleep and not deal with the decision.

 

 

            It is clear to us that this couple is not conjoined, with their obvious lack of communication.  Johan breaks all of the rules for husbands in conjugial interactions.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

 

 

More Than Just “I do” Report 2 by Paige Kim, G25

 

            The final presenter of the oral report on readings was Kimberly. She covered a report from Generation 25 that can be found at the above link.  The report discussed an article titled Secrets to a Happy Marriage by Rev. Dr. Trey Kuhne.  The author gives three rules he believes every happy marriage need.  Kimberly discussed these rules and how the fit into the stages leading to a Unity Model of Marriage.

 

Rule One: no hidden accounts.  This includes savings accounts, investments, and any other money either partner may have. He believes if you don’t hide your money from each other you are both equally empowered, and that equality equals intimacy. tKimberly believes his rule falls under the equity model of marriage. I agree.

 

Rule Two: good communication skills. Husbands are encourages to get rid of “man language” and explain themselves. This at first appears to fall under the Unity Model, as the wife desires a deeper communication. However he goes on to say “a woman’s opinion is just as important as a man’s.” This places the relationship back in the Equity phase.

 

Rule Three: praise spouse in public and private. Words are very powerful. If a partner feels valued and loved they feel more secure in a relationship. If a partner uses hurtful words this can affect them mentally and the relationship will suffer. In the article it is emphasized that both spouses should praise the other, which places this rule in the Equity phase.  

 

            This report also covered a May 13, 1955 article from Housekeeping Monthly titled The Good Wife’s Guide. It had a list of tips for wives as far as what to do to be prepared for their husband when he arrives home after work. Here are a couple of their tips:

 

- Don't ask him questions about his actions or question his judgment or integrity. Remember, he is the master of the house and as such will always exercise his will with fairness and truthfulness. You have no right to question him.

 

- Don't complain if he's late home for dinner or even if he stays out all night. Count this as minor compared to what he might have gone through that day.

 

- Make the evening his. Never complain if he comes home late or goes out to dinner, or other places of entertainment without you. Instead try to understand his world of strain and pressure, and his very real need to be at home and relax.

 

- Listen to him. You may have a dozen important things to tell him, but the moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him talk first -remember, his topics of conversation are more important than yours.

 

- Be a little gay and a little more interesting for him. His boring day may need a lift and one of your duties is to provide it.

 

            All of these tips are a clear example of the Male Dominance stage. The entire focus is on the husband, and the woman is expected to please him and show no discomfort of her own, no matter what.  We all laugh and find these tips hard to believe, but in 1955 these tips were accepted without question by most if not all wives.  While there is still a large portion of relationships in the Male Dominance phase, we are moving toward a wider acceptance of the Equity Phase.  Kimberly speculated that this trend could continue, and in the future there could be a wider acceptance of the Unity Model. 

 

            This led to a class discussion on mate selection and the evolutionary theory.  In this theory marriage is seen as a reproductive alliance. Males want to spread their seed, while females want long-term relationships to ensure care for their offspring.  The common double standard of the Male Dominance stage is supported by the evolutionary theory.  We discussed whether or not males can overcome the desire to “spread their seed” and commit to just one female. We also discussed the possibility of females looking for more suitable mates every 4 – 7 years.  It was agreed upon that the difficulty for a male to advance through the stages leading up to the Unity Model depended on his own belief as to why he acts the way he does. 

 

            I do believe all males are capable of committing to one female, I think it is a question of finding the right female, and being willing to work at a relationship.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

 

 

Section 3 Exercises

B. Nacapoy

 

 

(a)  Summarize the main ideas presented by the team.

 

The main points presented by the team were from exercises 6.1.  Each member of the team presented their own sections in relation to the Unity Model of Marriage.  Discussed were conjunctive behaviors, when the couple doesn’t disagree and they are both striving to reach the unity phase with the male’s emphasis on accepting his wife or girlfriend’s needs, wants, and desires.  This also involves the man trying to make every attempt to care for and acknowledge the thoughts and feelings of his partner.  Disjunctive behaviors are when the couple disagree and argue which therefore results in a lack of mental intimacy between partners.  The male and female go through different processes of conjoining the threefold self.  Women naturally want to conjoin and by this innate nature to do so, the woman will do everything they can to conjoin with their partner.  Men on the other hand try to resist conjoining at first to retain their independence and self from “giving in” to the woman’s desires.  When the man is ready, he will realize that he does not lose his independence and he will accept his wife or girlfriend’s wants and will do what he can to put their relationship at the center of his attention.  The ennead chart was used by the team to successfully analyze the different parts and phases of the Unity model.  Thoughts and feelings of both presenters own personal relationships were given and how their partner truly feels about the idea of the Unity Model of Marriage.

________________________________________________________________________

 

(b)  Describe what they did and how they interpreted it.

 

Both presenters related this particular section to their own personal lives.  One related it to their relationship with their husband and discussed how the husband does not really agree to the parts of the Unity Model but does acknowledge its existence.  The other group member also brought in their intimate personal relationship and she shared her views on how the Unity Model could possibly change her relationship for the better because it has already started to cause changes in the relationship.  This section really focused on the ideas of others such as friends, family, and/or lovers and their interpretations of the Unity Model were used to discuss their thoughts and ideas with these other people.

 _______________________________________________________________________

 

(c)  Describe some of the ideas that needed a better justification or greater amplification.  

 

For the most part, I think that both members really did a great job considering there were supposed to be three people in the group and they only had two.  I feel that more time could have been spent on the ennead chart.  If either member of the group really took the time to go slowly through the nine zones, the class and would have a deeper understanding about each zone.  Moreover, if they had greater amplification here, the class would truly be able to relate.  For most of the G27 students, they feel that they are somewhere between the male dominance and equity phases, so if more time was spent on each particular zone, we could figure out exactly which zone in which phase our relationship falls.  That would’ve been cool.

________________________________________________________________________

 

(d)  What was the success of the approach they used?

           

            In my perspective, their success was talking about their own personal lives and

            having an understanding of the ennead chart.  Since both team members were

successfully able to relate the ennead chart to their own relationships, we as audience members were able to connect and relate their examples to our own lives.  Some things that they said about their significant other were exactly some of the things I think and say from a male perspective in my own relationship.  That was a very successful approach.

_______________________________________________________________________

 

(e)  What improvements are needed in the procedures or in the instructions?

           

      I think that the instructions are clear for us to read.  This section really goes into great detail about the ennead chart.  Maybe it would be more helpful to separate specific examples in the lecture notes with each particular zone on the chart.  This way we can really see how our relationships fit into the Unity Model and how many more zones we need to move upward in to reach zone 9, affective intimacy and mental and spiritual unity.

_______________________________________________________________________

 

(f)  What are the limitations of these types of Exercises?

 

I actually feel there are fewer limitations with the types of exercises found in 6.1.  It is very helpful to relate the concepts and ideas of the Unity Model to our own lives.  This section was also not as long as some of the previous exercises so it was a lot easier to read through the material thoroughly with a better understanding.  I feel that exercise 6.1 is a great length for an exercise which will correspond to a great oral presentation by group members.

______________________________________________________________________

 

(g)  Describe what happened when you did some of the steps of the exercises.

 

       I actually found the exercises very interesting.  When I related the concepts to my own life and asked for the thoughts and feelings of friends and my girlfriend, their reactions amused me.  For some, Swedenborg’s Unity Model is something they find very hard to follow and accept.  This is much like how I was when I first started the class and I took the negative bias.  Their contrasting views allowed me to go into with more depth the concepts and other ideas of the Unity Model and see if these introduced ideas could change their views on the model with the introduction of the positive bias.  I really like taking what we’ve learned in class and applying it to life.  It’s great and every exercise should have some part that you relate directly to your own life.

_______________________________________________________________________

 

 

Section 4 Web Links

J. Garcia, B.Nacapoy, A.Valenzuela

 

Being Used By Your Husband, Emotional Blackmail

This link has a collection of women’s letters describing their relationships and how they have been hurt by the men in their lives and sexually blackmailed.

 

BLACKMAILED INTO FATHERHOOD

Borderline women and men who love them.

In this article it shows how men can be sexually blackmailed when they conceive on accident.

 

Harlequin Thinks Unsexy Thoughts

Harlequin novels are not so sexy anymore.  This website summarizes how the sexy novels are not happy endings anymore, but touch on real issues such as sexual abuse or blackmail.

 

4.  Why Men Are Afraid Of Commitment

     This link is dedicated to men in the male dominance phase.  It lists the reasons why men are opting not to marry and the options they have to loophole marriage commitment.

 

Deborah Tannen

This is a link to Deborah Tannen’s homepage at Georgetown University. Here you can learn more about her research on conversation and communication.

 

“Can’t We Talk?”  

A condensed look at Deborah Tannen’s You Just Don’t Understand, another of her works looking at the differences in conversation styles between men and women.

 

Language and Gender

This is a resource site by Andrew Moore for those interested in studying language and gender.

 

Why Do Men and Women Fight Differently?  

This gives us an idea of what some people in society feel is the reason for men and women fighting.  It is interesting to see how these ideas seem to contrast the Unity Model about fighting in relationships.

 

College Sex & Love: What is true love?  

This is Harriet Sun’s perspective on what is true love.  There is an explanation on her point of what is “true love” and this contrasts the ideas about “true love” in the Unity Model.  This seems to be more connected to societies views on love.

 

Lessons of Romanticism

This is an article explaining of the reasons why Blake rejects the ideas of Swedenborg.  This is a classic example of not taking the “positive bias” to his ideas as we have and thinking in “reductionism” and from the “negative bias.”  His views truly contrast that which we are learning in class and it is something that we should be aware of as a great example of reductionism.