J        Outline of My First Oral Presentation           J

“Court Monitoring and Traffic Safety from Workplace to Community”

(Joanne Jarvis and Walter Barta)

This is a presentation of Driving Lessons: Exploring Systems That Make Traffic Safer, edited by J. Peter Rothe. The University of Alberta Press, 2002; pgs. 161-192.

By Ynhu Le

 

Instructions for this oral presentation are found at:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy21/g21-oral.htm

 

I.      Court Monitoring (An activity aimed at closely watching and reporting on how the criminal-justice system handles Canada’s impaired drivers.)

A.   Definition and explanation:

1.      Court monitoring (also known as court watch) is a program designed to give citizens a powerful voice in how their courts are run. Victims and concerned citizens were alarmed at the leniency in which drunk drivers were treated by the criminal justice system. Volunteer citizen activists, such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), monitor DWI or Driving While Intoxicated court cases as a purpose to 1) increase the extent to which DWI cases are prosecuted and 2) to maximize the penalties imposed for a DWI conviction.

2.      Volunteers monitor and record important information about proceedings in the courtroom, or by reviewing court records outside of the courtroom.

B.    My opinion about this concept:

1.      We should learn more about court monitoring to see how it could help improve traffic safety.

2.      It is a very effective program because research shows that court monitoring can increase the likelihood of convictions, decreasing the likelihood of dismissals, and in cases of repeat offenders, increasing the length of jail sentences.

C.   The larger psychological and cultural significance of this concept:

1.      A quote from Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has”.  A community working together can have a true effect on its members. One positive outcome would be that community pressure could influence members to conform to social norms, such as abstaining from drinking and driving.

2.      A study conducted by Shinar (1990) showed that the likelihood of dismissal in non-monitored cases was 11.4%, compared to 6.1% for monitored cases; the likelihood of a guilty verdict was 87.3% for non-monitored cases versus 92.4% for monitored cases; and the average jail term for monitored cases was 30.9 days which was 50% longer than non-monitored cases.

3.      Several other organizations have used the court-monitoring program in order to effect positive change in their communities. An example would be the American Judicature Society (AJS).

D.   Related topics on the web:

1.      http://www.ncadd.com/097.cfm

II.   The Costs of Traffic Safety (We’re looking at the costs associated with traffic trauma on the macro and micro levels.)

A.   Definition and explanation:

1.      The costs of traffic safety: There are micro-level costs or costs that directly affect the individual and macro-level costs or costs that affect institutions such as family, community and government. Whether an individual is on the job, on the way to work or in the pursuit of leisure activities, motor-vehicle trauma is a major cost to organizations and to society alike.

2.      Organizational costs include: lost time, sick leave, temporary worker costs, insurance costs, lower productivity, etc. A study conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 1998 showed that American employers pay an estimated $55 billion annually for motor-vehicle crashes and injuries on and off the job.

B.    My opinion about this concept:

1.      We should be more aware of how much traffic trauma costs our society. I think that if we’re able to assess the costs of traffic safety from the macro levels to the micro levels then we can adopt better traffic-safety programs to reduce the costs of traffic safety.

2.      I think more attention should be given to address the impact and consequences of traffic safety in areas such as family, community, and workplace.

C.   The larger psychological and cultural significance of this concept:

1.      If we want to reduce the costs of traffic safety, we must first learn to understand the overall interrelationships of things. We need to use the cybernetic approach: understanding traffic safety using an interactive process.

2.      According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 1994, the economic cost of traffic crashes was $150.5 billion. If we were to include other costs on the macro levels, a more realistic cost of collisions would be around $336 billion.

D.   Related topics on the web:

1.      http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/economic/ecomvc1994.html

III.           Mission Possible at Work (MP@W) (It is a low-cost traffic-safety program designed to heighten traffic safety awareness both on and off the job.)

A.   Definition and explanation:

1.      Mission Possible at Work is a low-cost program designed to heighten traffic safety awareness in a workplace that started in Alberta, Canada. The program addresses the importance of road trauma, both on and off the job.

2.      Awareness sessions are designed to let employees be more aware of the consequences of traffic collisions. MP@W also uses prevention and accommodation strategies to educate the employees how to deal with the most common driving issues.

B.    My opinion about this concept:

1.      The MP@W is one of the successful programs out there that promotes traffic safety information-sharing among people in a workplace.

2.      I think the idea of implementing a traffic-safety program at the workplace is great because the information can reach many people at a low cost. It allows employers and employees an opportunity to work together to create changes.

C.   The larger psychological and cultural significance of this concept:

1.      Human beings exist within a context of relationships and communication. Therefore, traffic safety initiatives such as the MP@W must be directed at social levels that help include and support individual persons. [An example of child-safety programs].

2.      Participants in the MP@W program reported that they’ve seen some improvements in their driving skills. [Provide some examples].

D.   Related topics on the web:

1.      http://www.netsnational.org/index2.asp

2.      http://www.cgpsa.com/Safety/Mission%20Possible%20Workshop.pdf

                                             

My Home Page: http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/409af2004/le/home.htm