Annotated Bibliography Report

 

Ψ 409A

by Sherry Teruya

Spring 2003—Generation 18

 

Dr. Leon James, Instructor

 

Instructions for this report can be accessed here

 

Research Topic 1: Is sexist humor bad humor?

 

    We will all hear a sexist joke at some point in our lives. These are the jokes that are so hilarious that we can’t help but to laugh, but there are also the cruel sexist jokes that make us cringe and leaves us wondering who in their sane mind came up with something so appalling and derogatory. Should we just have to remember that when we do hear a sexist joke, it is just a joke and to try to not take it personally? Or could there be some underlying meaning to these jokes?

 

 

Stages of research

    In order to answer the questions as to why many men find sexist jokes amusing, and if they benefit from this type of humor, I had to use different queries on the Yahoo search engine. The first phrase I used was “sexist jokes and men”. There were many homepages about sexist jokes, so I knew I had to rephrase the query. Using “sexist jokes against women”, I was able to find an article that could be used to answer these questions. When I added the words “against women” in the query, it made a major difference in the types of articles that were found.

 

 

The findings

    An article I found called “Challenging men to end violence against women and children” written by The Good Apples Project states; “learn to recognize that signs of sexual harassment in your workplace” and sexual harassment can take on less obvious forms, such as sexist jokes or sexist language. It also states that this type of sexual harassment is not about sex per se, but about power. This article can be found at http://www.goodapples.ca/whatcanido.html

 

    Another article was called “The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students” written by Ryan KM, Kanjorski J., from a journal article found on the ISI Web of Knowledge website. Although this was an abstract of the article, the study found for men “the enjoyment of sexist humor was positively correlated with rape-related attitudes and beliefs, the self-reported likelihood of forcing sex, and psychological, physical, and sexual aggression in men.”

 

    This abstract also states that “for women, the enjoyment of sexist humor was only positively correlated with Adversarial Sexual Beliefs and Acceptance of Interpersonal Violence.” And “women also found the jokes to be less enjoyable, less acceptable, and more offensive than the men, but they were not significantly less likely to tell the jokes.” This article can be found at http://isi8.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi/wos

(NOTE: click on easy search then type in ‘sexist jokes and men’ to find article within this website)

 

 

The conclusion

    The first article by The Good Apples Project infers that sexist jokes or sexist humor toward women correlates with violence to women and/or children. This article also assumes that signs of violence and sexual harassment are usually by those who do use sexist language or sexist jokes. But not all men or women are the same. Some find this type of sexist humor enlightening and just for laughs, while others use this type of humor to degrade the other sex, perhaps to feel better about themselves.

 

Sexist language and jokes are also used by women. Does this mean that because women who do use this type of humor, that this should also be positively correlated towards violence against men and/or children? This article does not take into account that there are men and women who use sexist humor for just a few laughs and does not necessarily mean that they are violent towards people.

 

    The second article by Ryan KM and Kanjorski J. was a study of 399 of predominately white college students all of whom rated 10 sexist jokes on their “perceived funniness.” Their findings implied that male students who did enjoy sexist humor were more likely to have “rape-related attitudes and beliefs”, they were more likely to have “sexual aggression” and they had reported the “likelihood of forcing sex.” This finding is similar to the Good Apples Project article of sexist humor and violence towards women and/or children.

 

In general, men (or women) would not benefit from using sexist humor because the results from this study would put them into this “negative” or abusive category. Actually, nobody would be viewed positively for having a sexist sense of humor.

 

 

Next Step

    The next step I would take to understanding this issue would be to find more articles related to why men find this type of humor amusing and if so, do they actually benefit from it, and if they do, how so? Personally, I’m a female and do enjoy this type of humor, especially when I’m angry at the opposite sex. And some sexist jokes about women are down right hilarious. But this doesn’t mean that I am the abusive or violent type towards men or children. I’m sure many would agree that this type of humor does not equal violent behaviors, and it is just a mere way of relating to others (especially with close friends) by using sarcastic sexist jokes.

 

 

Advice to future generations

    My advice for this topic is to use many phrases on a well known search engine. You may have trouble finding decent articles that pertain to your topic, but don’t give up because there are a lot of sources on the web via journals, articles, archives, etc… And be sure to read the questions you have to answer over and over again to try to figure out what the professor is really asking.

 

 

 

Research Topic 2: Is it considered altruism?

 

    Some people believe that there is no such a thing as a selfless act. I have even heard that Mother Teresa could be considered a selfish person. While it would be ludicrous to call someone so highly looked upon as a selfish person, it may not be far from the truth. Compassionate and caring deeds are in fact selfish acts because of the gratifying feelings we get when helping others.

 

 

    Stages of research

    This time I decided to use Google.com as the search engine. I used the phrase “helping ourselves by helping others” and although there were many sites on volunteer work, I had no problem finding an article that could answer the questions on this topic. For the second article, I also used Google, but used the phrase “not altruism” and found an article that does not support the notion of real altruism.

 

 

The findings

    The first article called “Helping Ourselves by Helping Others” written by Deborah Spaide defines the power of helping ourselves through helping others. It explains a theory by Viktor Frankl called “Logo therapy” which “is based on helping people survive hardship by discovering the meaning in their life.” This article also emphasizes ways of helping ourselves by helping others when dealing with stress in our own lives and getting children to learn altruism. The article can be found at http://www.soulrise.com/common/helping.htm

 

  The second article I found is called “Taking Advantage: Give Until It Hurts: Altruism and Advertising” written by Richard F. Taflinger. In summary, this article states that there is no such thing as true altruism, but there is “reciprocal altruism.” Reciprocal altruism manifests in the form of “material return, a sense of self-esteem, or a sense of security.” This article can be found at http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~taflinge/altruism.html

 

 

The conclusion

    The article by Deborah Spaide is inspiring and gives light to the meaning of altruism. There is truth to the saying that by helping others, one is also helping his or her self. Can you remember a time you helped someone in need and the “high” you received from that deed? According to this article, this type of uplifting feeling is called the “helpers high” and has many physical and emotional benefits. Everyone could benefit from helping others, even if it may be the slightest help in your eyes, it could mean a lot to the other person and all the while better for your physical and mental well being.

 

    The article by Richard F. Taflinger makes a point that there is no such thing as true altruism because of what is reciprocated in return. But I could beg to differ and say that in my opinion, what if someone does help another person but receives no gratifying feeling, no greater self esteem, no material return or no sense of security whatsoever from doing so? Could this then be considered true altruism? Or is this just a selfless person with nothing better to do? What would then be a selfless act?

 

 

Next Step

    The next step I would take concerning this issue would be searching for more articles on the beneficial effects that one receives just by helping another person in need. I would search for scientific articles and would read if there had been major studies on these effects and if so, what are these effects?

 

 

Advice to future generations

    My advice I would have for future generations is to choose the topics that have meaning in your life. I feel that by doing so, the task of searching and researching for articles would not feel tedious and will always pique your interest because you are actually really searching for the answers that you have been curious to know.

 

 

 

Research 3: Sexism in children’s programs?

 

    Is it true that children’s programs can be considered sexist because of the proportion of male characters on these shows? Not being a mother myself, I was unaware if this was even a possibility. But having been a child myself, I recall when I was younger and the types of shows that I watched. Shows like the Smurfs, the Muppets, Mr. Rogers and Sesame Street were popular in my day. But as a young child, I never thought about how many males were on the show compared to how many females. I only thought it cool it was for Smurfette on the Smurfs because she could be surrounded by all boys and that Miss Piggy had it made. Never did I question the quantity of male characters versus female characters.

 

 

Stages of research

    This time I used MSN as the search engine. I had no problems and was able to find an article by using the phrase “television characters and sexist children programs.” The second article was also found using the MSN as the search engine. The phrase “sexism and culture” was used as the search query.

 

 

The findings

An article called “The influence of television on children’s gender role socialization” written by Susan Witt states that since the 1950’s, “About two-thirds of characters in television programs are male.” Also stated within this article is that sexism “can be found even among the Muppets, most of whom all have male names or male voices.” This article can be found at http://www2.lewisu.edu/~gazianjo/influence_of_television_on_child.htm

 

    The second article called “Sexism and Culture in Television” written by Jim Winn states that “television affects culture and culture affects television.” This reasoning that television and culture are intertwined makes sense because according to Jim Winn, “It appears that most viewers would like to have sexist shows that are dominated by male characters” to make the show more believable and because it reflects our culture. This article can be found at http://www.bluedojo.com/papers/sexism/

 

 

The conclusion

    The article by Susan Witt makes a strong point that television is the most influential form of media. She also states that perhaps the reason as to why boys instead of girls are given preference on children’s television programs is because it is the boys that represent more than 50 percent of the viewing audience. This could be the indication of why the proportion of male characters exceeds female characters especially in children’s programs. So does this necessarily mean that the shows are sexist? Perhaps shows such as the Muppets or Sesame Street would not survive since the percentage of viewers are in favor for boy viewers.

 

    Similar to Susan Witt’s article, Jim Winn makes a point by stating that it is culture that affects television and vice versa and that sexism exists on television because our culture demands this by making male characters foremost on these programs. Why is this so? He explains that it is because male characters are physically strong, have more endurance and are more likely to make the show more realistic.

 

 

Next Step

    The next step I would take in searching and understanding this issue is to find more scientific data that would explain why there are more male characters on children’s programming shows. I would search the statistics on male versus females within our country. It is perhaps this reason alone that makes the proportion of male characters higher than female characters on shows.

 

 

Advice to future generations

    While this may seem such a controversial issue, it may not be so. There are other factors to consider as to why male characters dominate children’s programs. My advice for future generations is to find out the reasons to why this is so and to search for scientific facts that pertain to sexism on television within our culture.

 

 

 

Research 4: Terror on the road

 

    According to our professor and author of “Road Rage and Aggressive Driving Steering Clear of Highway Warfare”, road rage can occur via many different factors. One factor that contributes to road rage could be considered to be congestion and time pressure and another factor assumed is the lack of compassion that drivers have towards others on the road. If you were to think of the two factors mentioned, which would you consider to be the cause of aggressive driving or road rage?

 

 

 Stages of research

    To find the explanation as to why aggressive driving occurs, whether due to congestion or lack of compassion, I used the MSN search engine and typed the phrase “aggressive driving.” Fortunately, there were many results pertaining to this topic.

 

 

The findings

    The first article I read is called “Aggressive Driving: Three Studies” from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety written by Louis Mizell, Matthew Joint and Dominic Connell. According to this article, “road rage” is “any display of aggression by a driver.” And that this can be contributed to “increasing congestion.” Furthermore, this article states that “humans are territorial. As individuals we have a personal space, or territory which evolved essentially as a defense mechanism.” Additionally, they implicate that “the car is an extension of this territory.” This article can be found here.

 

    The second article is called “Aggressive driving and road rage: they aren’t the same” written by Sgt. Robert L. Hohn from the Arizona Dept. of Public Safety. Mr. Hohn states that “aggressive driving and road rage are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same.” He implicates that what triggers “the aggressive driver is usually traffic congestion coupled with a schedule that is almost impossible to meet.” He states that “Road rage, on the other hand, is a criminal offense” and occurs “when a traffic incident escalates into a far more serious condition.” This article can be found at http://www.drivers.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?type=ART&id=000000462&static=1

 

 

The conclusion

    The first article by AAA Foundation makes a good point that aggressive driving and road rage occurs from congested roads. What also is true is that one of the main factors that influence driving behaviors is the type of mood the driver is in at the time. I think aggressive driving does occur from people who have volatile moods and emotions. The slightest incident could set them off. These are the scariest drivers on the road.

 

    The second article by Sgt. Hohn gives a clear cut definition of the differences between aggressive driving and road rage. And similar to the first article, road rage accidents are resulted from people who overreact in some way. Sgt. Hohn states that it is a simple act of common courtesy that will be appreciated. In other words, if people were to have more compassion toward others on the roads, many incidents could be avoided.

 

 

Next Step

    The next step I would do concerning this topic would be to search on the reasons why aggressive drivers allow themselves to drive while in a highly volatile mood state. I would research why they would risk not only their own lives, but the lives of innocent people as well. I would want to know the correlation between these types of drivers with the mentality of terrorists and the mentality of suicidal maniacs. I think that these could be associated with road rage.

 

 

Advice to future generations

    My advice is to search for articles that are applicable to your topic. Once again, use a trusted web search engine and have patience. If you don’t find something right away, don’t lose faith, just sit back for a few seconds and rethink your key phrases. And if that doesn’t work, try and try again.

 

 

 

Research 5: Optimism gets things done

 

   Have you ever felt so drained from listening to a pessimistic person talk about how wrong everything in their life has been? One bad thing after another, makes you wish you were deaf at times? And compare this to listening to someone optimistic about everything that has been going on in their life. Just by listening to an optimistic person, you feel alive and more energetic, I know I do. Could this pessimistic person be causing his own misfortunes in life? Does pessimism have to do with this person’s ability to improve his or her perceived outcomes?

 

 

Stages of research

    Using MSN as the search engine and typing the phrases “optimism and pessimism” and “optimism and self efficacy”, I had no trouble finding a few articles.

 

 

The findings

The first article called “Living with Pessimism and Optimism” written by Kevin Sharpe and Rebecca Bryant states that “exorbitant optimism can obscure hazards” and that “depressed people (mostly pessimists), on the other hand, view reality correctly, and more accurately assess their control.” And that “non-depressed people (mostly optimists) distort reality for their own ends and excessively rate their control, especially when powerless.” This article can be found at http://www.ksharpe.com/Word/CO28.htm

 

    The second article called “Peak Performance, Self Esteem, and Self Efficacy” states that “self esteem and self efficacy are central to the sustained success of any individual.” Together, they “formulate a powerful vaccine against distress, depression, helplessness, dependency, and irrational cognition” and “they are the key to optimism, positive behavior change and the achievement of goals.” This article can be found at http://www.imt.net/~randolfi/esteem.html

 

 

The conclusion

    According to the first article, pessimism is the key factor for putting people in perspective when it comes to a reality check. This reality check could be the motivation behind accomplishing goals. But pessimism and depression are usually interrelated. How does a pessimistic person whom is also depressed, achieve self efficacy? It is possible that due to the pessimistic outlook on life, achieving one’s goals would be unattainable because of the fact that their views would be perceived in a negative fashion. Everything could seem hopeless for a depressed person.

 

    The second article implies that it is self esteem and self efficacy that are the driving force behind optimism and the power for one to achieve their goals. This makes sense because it has been said that people with higher self esteem tend to achieve more for themselves versus those with lower self esteem. They further state that how does a person achieve “their potential if they do not believe in themselves and their ability to accomplish what they take on.” We need an optimistic view on life in order to make any type of accomplishments.

 

 

Next Step

    The next step I would take for this topic would be to search for more articles on how an optimistic and pessimistic personality develops. And if pessimism were due to past negative consequences or experiences, can this person change his or her personality for the better.

 

 

Advice to future generations

    Once again, use a trusted web search engine and have patience. If you don’t find something right away, don’t lose faith, just sit back for a few seconds and rethink your key phrases. And if that doesn’t work, try and try again. Try to remain “optimistic” and you will be bound to find something useful.

 

 

 

Research 6: Fact or Fiction?

 

    Is there truth about combining coca cola and aspirin will cause a high? I have never thought about it and have taken aspirin with some form of caffeinated soft drink. But did this cause a high or did it just wake me up and get rid of the headache I was suffering?

 

 

Stages of research

    I used MSN as the search engine for one article and typed the phrase “combining coca cola and aspirin”. I also used Google.com as another search engine and used the phrase “coca cola, aspirin and high” and had no trouble finding an article for this topic.

 

 

The findings

    The first article called “Painkiller Combination” written by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson states that combining coca cola and aspirin will not get a person high. But “when served up together, the combination packs a much greater pain-killing effect than either of the products would on their own because the caffeine in the soda appears to work to boost the effect of the aspirin.” This article can be found at http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/aspirin.asp

 

    The second article called “Aspirin” by Emily McPherson states that “some people take aspirin to get "high". Ten years ago ads on television claimed that mixing aspirin with Coca-Cola was guaranteed to give you a "buzz".” But, “this faulty reasoning has led to serious and fatal overdoses by many thrill seekers. In 1985 aspirin was the drug of choice during suicide attempts.” This article can be found at http://www.jiskha.com/health/substance_abuse/aspirin.html

 

 

The conclusion

    According to both articles, combining coca cola with aspirin does not give a person a “high”. This misconception is popular among the teenagers, those of who like to experience different things to get a cheap high. This is similar to the notion that inhaling glue will get you high, although in this case, it will more than likely give you a headache.

 

 

Next Step

    The next step I would further take for this topic is to find out what other forms teenagers are using to try to get a “high”, why they are trying to get high in the first place and what contributes to these dangerous behaviors.       

 

 

Advice to future generations

    My last advice to future generations is to have fun while researching for articles because it can be quite time consuming and frustrating at times. But try to remain hopeful and don’t give up just because you were unable to find articles that pertained to the topic you were researching. And one last thing, don’t procrastinate until the last minute to research the topics according to both sides of the issue. Find what you need, copy it on your hard drive or print out the article (for easier referencing) and be sure to jot down the web site address you are getting your information from. This will save a lot of time in the long run.

 

 

References

http://www.goodapples.ca/whatcanido.html

http://isi8.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi/wos

http://www.soulrise.com/common/helping.htm

http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~taflinge/altruism.html

http://www2.lewisu.edu/~gazianjo/influence_of_television_on_child.htm

http://www.bluedojo.com/papers/sexism/

AAA Foundation.org

http://www.drivers.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?type=ART&id=000000462&static=1

http://www.ksharpe.com/Word/CO28.htm

http://www.imt.net/~randolfi/esteem.html

http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/aspirin.asp

http://www.jiskha.com/health/substance_abuse/aspirin.html

 

 

[Back to My Home Page]  [Email me]