For her second report, there are also five parts which is similar to her report #1. In the Introduction, she basically explains to us what we will see and expect in her report such as her inclusion of Mr. Glover's discussion of what a sucky or savvy homepage is all about in the section she calls "Web Designer Principles." In the "Psychological Aspects to Web Design," she included three ideas she took from Dr. James' Social Psychological Principles of Home Page Architecture. The first idea was on "My Home Page is My Other House," where she compared the homepage to a house. Another idea she extrapolated from is "If no one ever clicks a link on a Page, it becomes an unlink in the zone of virtual silence," which means that a homepage has to be accessible and clickable to be an active participant on the net. Finally, the third idea was on "Cyber-space is a representative model of the mental world which means the spiritual world." Unfortunately, she didn't have any comment on this section. The section on "What It's Like to Become a Web Designer," she talked about her experience in designing her homepage last semester when she took 409a. She said that the first time she started building her homepage, she was displacing her anger on the computer, just like most of us are doing right now. She also mentioned that when she was designing her page, she was thinking more about getting a good grade but later on, she realized that she was designing her homepage to make it work. For her "Annotated Index to Web Design," she included four links she referred to when she was doing her homepage. These are: HTML Goodies, Thinking Critically about World Wide Web Resources, Edward Sugimoto's HTML Tutorial, and Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design. Most of these sites will help you understand HTML codes and how to actually start building your homepage.
I was impressed with the way she presented her topics for each report. She has 5 parts for each one of them and she followed the same format all the way through. I guess, what I'm trying to say is that she's very consistent with her reports. And this is one of the strong points she had in her report and probably an original logic she thought of when she started doing her report. I would probably do the same thing so people will not get confused and to make it easier for them to decide which topic to see first. The only weak content I noticed is she didn't talk much about Dr. James' Social Psychological Principles of Homepage Architecture and why Mr. Glover's page will be useful for first time web designers. I also noticed that the font she used for the reports were way too big as if she's avoiding to write more about the reports, unless of course that's what Dr. James required them to do. Overall, she tackled her reports consistently and intelligently.
For her second report, I compared Rose-Anne Ancog's second report to hers. The very first thing I noticed between the two reports was the length. I found Rose-Anne's second report to be longer and she didn't have to use bigger fonts like Mary Rose did. She also linked Mr. Glover's page to hers, like Mary Rose did, as well as Dr. James' page on Social Psychological Principles of Home Page Architecture. The only difference is that she had more interesting things to say about Dr. James' page. Rose-Anne discussed the Psychological Characteristics of Hypertext Links using the ACS (Affective, Cognitive, Sensorimotor) domain. The other two features she included and briefly discussed were: Informational Content of Home Pages and Stylistic Features of Home Pages. The informational content of home pages is about how you could make your home page easy to follow and transitional. For the Stylistic features of home pages, she said that the style of a homepage is important but if it takes 10 seconds for your page to load -- that's too long and it's not worth waiting for. I also noticed that Rose-Anne wrote more of her experiences in designing her home page than Mary Rose did. But, the titles and the way they presented their reports were somehow similar -- simple and easy to follow.