Large ViewCUSTOMIZING MY EMOTIONAL SPIN CYCLELarge View

Large View

INTRODUCTION

 

OVER VIEW OF PROJECT

 

EMOTIONS

 

FEELINGS

 

THREEFOLD SELF

 

HIERARCHY OF MOTIVES

 

REFERENCES

 

INTRODUCION

 

Report one is based on customizing my emotional spin cycle.  It will begin with defining emotions, feelings, threefold self (affective, cognitive, sensor motor), and hierarchy of motives (emotions, feelings, values).  Each term will be backed up by a reference from past generational curriculum (G14-G1), news media (newspaper and magazines online), and web sites and articles.  The terms will be defined in my own words and will be cited by references I choose.  The emotional spin cycle is a cycle that everyone encounters everyday.  Functioning through feelings, to thoughts and resulting in actions, which can be either positive or negative.  Report 2 that will posted up on November 27th, 2001.  This report will consist of customizing my own emotional spin cycle based on data analysis.  It will consist of an introduction, data collection and analysis, discussion, conclusion and references.  Report 2 will be linked to report 1.

 

OVER VIEW OF PROJECT

 

Every one socialized, which means to acquire particular habits.  We do this in accordance with cultural norms.  Habits are set in three areas of human functioning:

 

1.  Habits of feeling (AFFECTIVE DOMAIN OF BEHAVIOR)

2.  Habits of thinking (COGNITIVE DOMAIN OF BEHAVIOR)

3.  Habits of acting (SENSORI-MOTOR DOMAIN OF BEHAVIOR)

 

Also everyone has a threefold-self, these three parts function together.  Each function can be well-known and cut off for recognizing and modifying for the self.

 

The threefold-self is broken into two parts.  One part is “others” and the second part is the “self”.  “Others” in the emotional spin cycle are in the red zone and “self” in the emotional spin cycle are in the blue zone.  The red zone and the blue zone can be both be negative or positive.

 

Each zone is described below:

Zone 1 (negative red) = Feeling rage-anger (setting 1) coupled with impaired thinking (2) lead to aggressive behavior (3)

Zone 2 (negative blue) = Feeling depression (setting 4) coupled with pessimistic thinking (5) lead to self-destructive behavior (6).

Zone 3 (positive blue) = Feeling self-mastery and self-satisfaction (setting 7) coupled with optimistic thinking (8) lead to self-enhancing behavior (9).

Zone 4 (positive red) = Feeling zeal or compassion (setting 10) coupled with emotionally intelligent thinking (11) lead to supportive and constructive behavior (12).

 

This is a picture of the emotional spin cycle below:

 

 

Citation:  “General Instructions for Your Research Project.” Internet. 27 Sept. 2001. Available:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy15/g15reports-instructions.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EMOTIONS

 

Emotion is a sensation that one feels when they get angry, sad, happy, excited, etc. and is followed by a reaction.  According to “The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology”, a magazine that provides us with e-information solutions for libraries, schools and businesses emotion is defined as,  “A reaction, both psychological and physical, subjectively experienced as strong feelings, many of which prepare the body for immediate action”.  Emotion is related to the emotional spin-cycle in where emotions is the part where we feel.  The feelings we feel strike emotions such as mentioned in my definition angry, sad, happy, excited, etc. The article goes on to explain how some emotions are primary emotions and some are complex.  Primary emotions being innate and complex emotions are those that come form social learning.  The James-Lange Theory was developed in the 1880’s where the theory was about emotions in modern times.  Founded by William James and C.G. Lange, both thought that physiological signs of emotions precede the subjective ones.  Later Walter Cannon in 1927 said that emotions do come from the central nervous system.  This theory was called, The Cannon-Bard Theory in collaboration with Phillip Bard.  

Citation:  “The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology” Magazine Internet, 2001

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/g2699/0001/2699000113/p1/article.jhtml

 

 

“In contrast to moods, which are generally longer-lasting, emotions are transitory, with relatively well-defined beginnings and endings. They also have valence, meaning that they are either positive or negative. Subjectively, emotions are experienced as passive phenomena. Even though it is possible to exert a measure of control over one's emotions, they are not initiated-they happen to people. Objectively, emotions involve internal physiological responses and expressive outward displays that are both learned and innate. Certain emotions themselves, considered to be primary emotions-joy, anger, sadness, fear, and love-are thought to be innate, while complex emotions-such as altruism, shame, guilt, and envy-seem to arise from social learning.”

“The first influential theory of emotion in modern times-the James-Lange theory-was formulated independently in the 1880s by both American psychologist and philosopher William James and Danish physiologist C.G. Lange (1834-1900). Both scientists arrived at the view that the physiological manifestations of emotion precede the subjective ones-rather than trembling because we are afraid, we are afraid because we tremble. Even though the brain responds to a threatening situation by activating peripheral responses, we do not consciously experience the emotion until these responses are activated. Thus, the central nervous system itself does not actually produce the emotion. Over the following decades, this theory drew widespread response and criticism.”

“An alternative model of emotional experience was formulated in 1927 by Walter Cannon (1871-1945), who proposed that emotions do originate in the central nervous system. Cannon argued that nerve impulses first pass through the thalamus, from which subjective responses are routed through the cerebral cortex, directly creating the experience of fear at the same time that physiological responses are passing through the hypothalamus. The Cannon-Bard theory, whose name reflects later modifications by Phillip Bard, thus delineated the psychological and physiological components of emotion as simultaneous and argued that the experience of emotion comes directly from the central nervous system. Some more recent theorists have once again moved closer to the James-Lange model. The 1962 Schachter-Singer theory restores James's emphasis on the interpretation of physiological responses but adds another element-a cognitive evaluation of what caused the responses. This theory thus contradicts James's assertion that emotion is communicated solely on the basis of physical feedback, asserting that this feedback by itself is not clear enough to specify a particular emotion. Rather, the brain chooses one of many possible interpretations and "labels" the feedback pattern, and it is this labeling that results in the experiencing of a particular emotion.”

“Areas of the brain that play an important role in the production of emotions include the reticular formation, the limbic system, and the cerebral cortex. The reticular formation, within the brain stem, receives and filters sensory information before passing it on the limbic system and cortex. The limbic system includes the hypothalamus, which produces most of the peripheral responses to emotion through its control of the endocrine and autonomic nervous systems; the amygdala, which is associated with fear and aggressive behavior; the hippocampus; and parts of the thalamus. The frontal lobes of the cerebral cortex receive nerve impulses from the thalamus and play an active role in the experience and expression While the physiological changes associated with emotions are triggered by the brain, they are carried out by the endocrine and autonomic nervous systems. In response to fear or anger, for example, the brain signals the pituitary gland to release a hormone called ACTH, which in turn causes the adrenal glands to secrete cortisol, another hormone that triggers what is known as the fight-or-flight response, a combination of physical changes that prepare the body for action in dangerous situations. The heart beats faster, respiration is more rapid, the liver releases glucose into the bloodstream to supply added energy, fuels are mobilized from the body's stored fat, and the body generally goes into a state of high arousal. The pupils dilate, perspiration increases while secretion of saliva and mucous decreases, hairs on the body become erect, causing "goose pimples," and the digestive system slows down as blood is diverted to the brain and skeletal muscles. These changes are carried out with the aid of the sympathetic nervous system, one of two divisions of the autonomic nervous system. When the crisis is over, the parasympathetic nervous system, which conserves the body's energy and resources, returns things to their normal state.”

“Ways of expressing emotion may be either innate or culturally acquired. Certain facial expressions, such as smiling, have been found to be universal, even among blind persons, who have no means of imitating them. Other expressions vary across cultures. For example, the Chinese stick out their tongues to register surprise, in contrast to Americans and other Westerners, who raise their eyebrows and widen their eyes. In addition to the ways of communicating various emotions, people within a culture also learn certain unwritten codes governing emotional expression itself-what emotions can be openly expressed and under what circumstances. Cultural forces also influence how people describe and categorize what they are feeling. An emotion that is commonly recognized in one society may be subsumed under another emotion in a different one. Some cultures, for example, do not distinguish between anger and sadness. Tahitians, who have no word for either sadness or guilt, have 46 words for various types of anger.”

“In daily life, emotional arousal may have beneficial or disruptive effects, depending on the situation and the intensity of the emotion. Moderate levels of arousal increase efficiency levels by making people more alert. However, intense emotions-either positive or negative-interfere with performance because central nervous system responses are channeled in too many directions at once. The effects of arousal on performance also depend on the difficulty of the task at hand; emotions interfere less with simple tasks than with more complicated ones of emotions.”

 

 

The Schachter-Singer theory in 1962, continued from the Cannon-Bard theory, but added this element a cognitive evaluation of what caused the responses.  To find out more information on the cognitive view on emotions I turned to the “National Institute of Mental Health”, web-site where I found an interesting study on the revolution of emotions.  

 Citation: “National Institute of Mental Health”, “Seeing our Feelings”, January 01, 2001 http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/feel.cfm

 “In the last few years, there has been a revolution in the study of emotions. Our emotions—love, fear, anger, desire—give coloration and meaning to everything in life. Our emotions are indispensable whenever we choose to pursue one goal and not another. The derangement of emotions is what leads to the profound pain and much of the disability experienced in mental illness. The emotions were once thought to reside in the heart, but scientists know now that they originate in the brain.”

New Imaging Tools

“Scientists have learned to use neuroimaging to see the living, thinking, feeling human brain at work. Neuroimaging tools include functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which uses magnetic fields and radio waves to elicit signals from the brain, and positron emission tomography (PET), which uses low doses of a radioactive tracer to obtain signals from the brain. Both of these technologies have been designed to reveal signals that correlate with human brain activity. These approaches have been used to study the pathways in the brain involved in sensory processes such as vision, and in a variety of cognitive processes.
 

Image of the amygdala in response to fear
    fMRI images showing activation of the amygdala in response to viewing faces,
    as compared to watching a simple visual fixation point (*).
    Slice 24=forward part of amygdala; Slice 25=backpart of amygdala.
    Image is viewed as though the person is looking out from the page,
    so the left amygdala is on the right of the picture.
    More intense colors show greater activation. 2

“We are now at the dawn of an era when we can use these technologies to see pathways in the brain that underlie emotions such as fear and desire. In the near future, these approaches will allow us to see precise abnormalities in brain pathways that produce mental illness”.

Brain Pathways

“Fear is the emotion that has been most successfully studied. Fear is required for our survival, but when it is not regulated, it becomes responsible for anxiety disorders and some of the symptoms of depression. We have learned that fear depends on very specific circuits in the brain. In fact, the way that the brain processes emotion is no different from the way it processes vision or voluntary movements, which also rely on their own specific circuitry.”

“The emotion of fear relies on pathways that involve a structure deep in our brains called the amygdala. The details of this circuitry have been worked out in rat models; however, a series of studies that began in 1996 and have become increasingly sophisticated have demonstrated that showing a fearful face to a normal subject while scanning his/her brain permits us to see activation of the amygdala and associated brain pathways. 1,2,3,4  Subsequent experiments have shown that if humans learn a connection between a neutral signal and something noxious, like a loud buzzing sound, we actually can observe the brain in the act of storing information about the signal that predicts danger.5,6,7  We can see that the brain processes information about threat and fear even when the person is not concentrating on it and may not even consciously remember seeing the danger signal.”

“Although this research is still in its early phase, success to date in delineating specific fear pathways has encouraged the investigations of emotional pathways in mental illness. We are finding out, for example, whether phobias hitchhike on the same pathways used by normal fear. Soon we will have information about other emotions and conditions such as depression. Over time, these tools will be used to study the effects of medications and psychological therapies on mental illness.”

 

 

 

This site above shows the different structures in the brain that participate in causing our emotions.  Studying the brain pathways have given way in involving sensory procedures such as vision, and some cognitive procedures.  Fear, an emotion can lead us to depression and anxiety attacks.   The emotion fear relies on a particular structure in the brain, the amygdala.  The amygdala is two small almond shaped structures located in our brains.  Here is a web-site I found on the amygdala and a few pictures on where it is located in our brains.

Citation:  “Introduction to the Amygdala”, Dr. Keele April 1997                                  http://marlin.utmb.edu/~nkeele/intro.html

“The amygdala, named for its anatomical resemblance to the almond, is a major component of the limbic system located in the temporal lobe. As part of the limbic system, the amygdaloid complex the has been implicated in many brain functions (Aggleton 1992) including emotion (LeDoux 1992; LeDoux 1993; LeDoux 1994; Gallagher and Chiba 1996), learning and memory (Davis 1992; Gallagher and Holland 1994), and epilepsy (Cain 1992; Gloor 1992). The participation of the amygdala in these functions has been conjectured for many years, but only recently have the fine details of amygdaloid structure and function come to light. The significance of the amygdala has been greatly underestimated, emphasizing the need to understand its vital roles in contributing to human nature and disease.”
     “The role of the amygdala has often been overlooked in models of brain function. In 1937, Papez described neural structures and circuitry believed to control emotion and behavior (Papez 1937). This system, termed the Papez circuit, included the cingulum, the hippocampus, the mammilary bodies and the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, without involving the amygdala. Later, McLean (1949) expanded the original Papez circuit to encompass cortical structures and subcortical forebrain nuclei, including the amygdala. He termed these structures which were believed to connect the brain with the bodily organs the "visceral brain" (McLean 1949), and later the limbic system (McLean 1952). Although McLean's limbic system included the amygdala, the focus was on the hippocampus as the primary functional structure in emotion (McLean 1952).”
     “The significance of the amygdala was not recognized until Klüver and Bucy (1937; 1939) described dramatic effects in monkeys having temporal lobectomies. Removal of the temporal lobes transformed the most fierce and aggressive animals to tame and docile ones. Klüver and Bucy (1937; 1939) also described states of hypoemotionality, hyperorality, and abnormal exploratory and sexual behaviors in the lobectomized animals, termed Klüver-Bucy syndrome. Subsequently, it was shown that the behaviors manifest as Klüver-Bucy syndrome could result from bilateral lesioning of the amygdala (Weiskrantz, 1956). Today, the amygdala is widely recognized as a critical structure in emotional processing (LeDoux 1992), whereas the structures of the Papez circuit participate more in cognition (Weiskrantz 1956). In studies with humans having discrete lesions localized to the amygdala (Urbach-Wiethe disease), it has been shown that the amygdala is critical for processing emotional stimuli and forming emotional memory (Adolphs et al., 1994); and further, that there is a dissociation between the role of the amygdala in emotion and the function of the hippocampus in declarative memory (Bechara et al., 1995).”

                              
                                                                                                                  

 

 

FEELINGS

Feelings are actions that are acted upon our emotions.  It is cycles that we experience everyday whether it is good or bad, just like emotions that it is why they are tied together, but are not the same thing.  We become aware of our feelings and emotions everyday, more so now since taking this course.  Feelings are tied into the emotional spin cycle where we feel upon our emotions.  Also feelings can also be negative or positive feelings for others or our selves on the emotional spin cycle.   Below are a few past generation forums that speak about how they started to be aware of their emotions more so from taking this advanced Psychology course.

Citation:  Forum Generations 14,13 and 9                                              http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/updates/aihara/forumfiles

Supreme-Finess 01/30/01 3:42 PM                Self-witnessing report #1

             

 Just the other day I had an episode of rage that I would like to comment on. In order for you to understand my perspective, let me provide you with a little background information. On the 27th of this month was my girlfriend's birthday, which fell on a Saturday. I had gotten paid a day earlier which was a Friday and I needed to cash my paycheck and come into work by 5 o'clock so I was very pressed for time. I had to cash my check and fly over to the florist and have roses delivered to her and I needed this done before my shift. As I made my way to the bank an SUV driven by a male was in front of me. We were both in a residential district so the speed limit was somewhere between 20 and 25mph. This guy was going like 10-12 mph. I immediately became frustrated. And if there is one thing I learned in this course so far was that frustration is also considered rage. Nevertheless I became very upset because I was not going to make it in time before the bank closed and I really wanted to get those flowers to my girlfriend. So what I did was speed up and pass the person. I was frustrated and i took action. Here's where I learned a valuable lesson. I should have controlled my frustration better because in the end I still was late to get to the bank and was unable to get the flowers in time for her birthday anyways.”

 

(16)From leon@hawaii.edu Wed Jul 8 16:27:09 1998
Subject: emotional intelligence

Hi cyber-Class G9!

“I read all your answers with interest--everyone seems to have pet peeves about other drivers, that is, things they do that annoy us and make our life behind the wheel a miserable one, or at least, an unpleasant and stressful one.”

“Now I'd like your reactions to my idea as DrDriving that each of us have a driving conscience (our own DrDriving so to speak) who tells us what's the best way to drive and deal with other drivers. DrDriving defines EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AS A DRIVER as the ability to think of alternative reasons that another driver does something.”

“For instance, a driver is very close behind you and you're worried about it. A normal thing to do say is that stupid driver is tailgating me or wants me to go faster or is not happy about how I drive, etc. These negative thoughts are unpleasant and increase your driving stress.”

“So now you can train yourself to say other things that are more pleasant or are less annoying: The driver is distracted and is not aware how closely they are following me. Or if someone comes into your lane suddenly, instead of thinking The Idiot has Cut Me Off, (which is annoying and upsetting), you can say, That driver is distracted or That driver must be in a great hurry or That Driver might need More Training , etc (which is less annoying).”

“So now your MISSION IMPOSSIBLE in this discussion is to think back on your pet peeves (the things that annoy you other drivers do) and give us an analysis (pick your two major pet peeves)”:

    a)what "false" assumptions are you making when you feel annoyed

    b)what alternative assumptions can you think of for that kind of behavior

ShaunnaM 01/26/00 12:07 PM
RE: RC G13 Hawaii QDC

It's true that most people only focus on the bad and never the good, I noticed it in myself after I read the posting , I didn't really even pay attention to any other drivers AT ALL unless they did something wrong or were driving wrecklessly. But even though we notice other bad drivers, what can we do about it? - Nothing. The only thing that we can do is be aware to stay away from them, let them drive wrecklessly and ruin their own car, but when people try to but in and intervene, that's when accidents are caused, or even acts of road rage. I have seen it before, on the highway, other drivers try to stop speeding cars weaving in and out by blocking or slowing down, only to become the victims of a crash. It's better to stay out of the way.”

The first forum discussed how the student wanted to comment on her rage that she experienced.  The student has already beginning to be aware of their emotions.  The student was also aware that frustration was a form of rage from taking this course.  Being he/she was frustrated he/she acted upon that feeling. The second forum is written by Dr. James.  One part of the forum defines, “Emotional Intelligence as a Driver, as the ability to think of alternative reasons when another driver does something”(G9).  Thinking of alternative good reasons rather then the bad when a driver does something, strikes your emotional button.  This is when you become aware and can also control your feelings.  By becoming aware Dr. James says, “So now you can train yourself to say other things that are more pleasant and are less annoying”(G9).  The questions that he states at the bottom of his forum are good questions I think to ask yourself and answer it is to become more aware of how you feel; not particuraly when you are driving, but in any given situation: a.  What “false” assumption are you making when you feel annoyed and b.  What alternative assumptions can you think of for that kind of behavior.  The last forum goes into how people usually write about the bad and not the good.  She goes on to write that she noticed how others would express their rage while driving.  Which lead me to question where are all the forums on the good, instead of the bad and here are a few I found in past forum discussions.

Citation: Forum Generations 14                                                         http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/updates/aihara/forumfiles

ddestrad   04/06/01 3:24 PM                      No Rage!

             

 “I have nothing better to talk about than the fact that i have absolutely no rage at this moment! So sorry if this isn't exciting enough for yous!! I could be stressing over all of my homework that is due or papers to be written or my endless search for a job but i don't really give a shit, I'm not letting anything bother me, life is good!! Well i hope that all of you have a really nice weekend and maybe we'll see each other on Monday, or maybe we won't, unless TA Daniel plans on holding class...(just kidding), maybe i'll go finish up my rough draft due monday for project 2....maybe.... see ya later!!”

 

BC3   04/13/01 10:39 PM    Cell Phones

             

 “I am a bad person. I tend to answer phones while driving my car even though I hate it when others do the exact same thing. I guess it kind of stems from the fact that I don't want to miss a call, because it might be important. (my cell phone doubles as a buisness phone.) Is buisness that important? I think it all goes back to this whole rush thing. I think I feel that I can be more efficient if I settle matters before getting to work or whereever I am going. In any case this must stop because people are already recognizing that this behavior is dangerous. I think from now on I'll through the phone in the trunk.”

 

AnimalLover 04/22/01 8:54 PM                  Less Rage

             

“ My mother likes to make me drive home from my grandmothers house because she likes to sleep in the backseat and my stepfather shouldn't drive because he spends the night drinking with my cousins so I'm the only one left. I used to get really irritated at my mother because she is supposed to be in the backseat sleeping but I still hear her yelling things at me like "Watch the road!" when I'm talking story to my stepfather and "Red light!" when I see it way in advance. Now I just laugh when she does that because it will just be a lose-lose battle and I acknowledge her comment with an "I know" or "Please" and my stepfather just laughs and says "Don't worry, she still says the same thing to me and I've been driving since I was twelve", which helps me not to take it so personally.”

 

leis 04/22/01 10:16 PM        Rage Stteled Down

             

“Finally strike was over. Now I feel much better than past a couple weeks.  As strike seemed to continue for a long time, I was not able to plan any schedule even after this semester. So my irritating-feeling was almost extreme. Once strike was settled down, although I have a tight schedule to finish up this semester like most of you and, I feel much better, even refreshed. I want to enjoy the short rest of school life.”

 

 

 

 

All forums cited above show how we experience not just the bad feelings, but the good as well.  In the first forum instead of feeling frustrated and being stressed over homework this student decided that feeling that way was just not worth it.  The second forum a bad to good transition where taking a bad situation where bad feelings and aggressive actions could have come into play and turned it into a good thing.  Where he became aware of how dangerous it is to talk on a cell phone while driving.  The next forum again transitions bad feelings into good feelings.  Where she no longer worried about how her mother tells her how to drive, but just shakes it off by laughing.  And the final forum explains how even though her schedule is tight and hectick she is going to stop and smell the roses.  Taking one day at a time and loving every second of it. 

Taking a look at the Daily Emotional Spin Cycle, feelings consist of anger or rage (zone 1 others), depression and dissatisfaction (zone 2 self) on the red  zones;  zeal and compassion (zone 4 others), and mastery and satisfaction (zone 3 self) in the blue zones.  

 circle2.gif (13820 bytes)

THREEFOLD SELF

 

            The threefold self is made up of three components, the affective (feelings and emotions), the cognitive (interpretations and decisions), and sensorimotor (sensations, perceptions and verbalizations).   Dr. Leon James, author of Data on the Private World of the Driver in Traffic: Affective, Cognitive and Sensorimotor, writes “All skills at any level of expertise contain affective, cognitive and sensorimotor features.”  He is describing that all three branches are intertwined.  In his study of drivers, he looks at these three domains and shows how all three levels interact.

Citation: “Data on the Private World of the Driver in Traffic: Affective, Cognitive and Sensorimotor.”  Internet.  October 9, 2001.    http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/driving1.html

THE DRIVER'S THREEFOLD SELF

“In its modern version, behaviorism is committed to a unified theory that tries to deal with external and internal aspects of the self (Staats, 1981; Mischel, 1973). For instance, the concept of personality is defined in terms of built-up repertoires of basic habits. These are actually skills and errors that can be modified through further learning. This acquisition process is going on in three distinct domains of the person: affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor (or perceptual-motor). Figure 1 depicts the inter-relationship between these three aspects of driver behavior as a nested structure. All skills at any level of expertise contain affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor features. An illustration is presented in Table 1 based on self-witnessing reports by drivers. Though the recording of the report is necessarily sequential in that the driver focuses separately on each domain, in actuality the model assumes that all three are going on simultaneously.”
See Isa's comments on this.

The Driver's Affective Self


”In the following data segment tape recorded by a student, several dimensions of affect are discernible in this person's experience during a routine driving episode:
"Oh, no, there's a police car coming up from behind. I hope he didn't see me driving fast. Besides, I'm not the only one who is driving fast. If he pulls me over to the side, he has to pull everyone else over too. I'll be so embarrassed if he pulls me over. Everyone will know that I was breaking the law."
Content analysis focuses on the "speech act" value of the components of verbalizations (Searle, 1969; Jakobovits and Gordon, 1974). For instance, "Oh, no" marks an affective stricture or a perception of doom; it indexes an emotional flooding-out. "I hope" marks a religious affection or an idealized picture of reality. "Besides, I'm not the only one" bespeaks guilt and self-justification; it raises the specter of personal catastrophe expressed in "I'll be so embarrassed... Everyone will know..." A little later this subject displays affections of condemnation or disapproval when another car cut in front: "Careless and pushy drivers always do things like that." In another episode, this person expresses anxiety and fear: "I almost sideswiped a car which had been traveling in my blind spot. As I was turning back into the middle lane I was in a state of mild anxiety. Thinking about what could've happened made me scared." Thus, expressing fear in a driving incident or showing disapproval of another driver are instances of affective driving behavior.”

The Driver's Cognitive Self


”Data regarding this individual's cognitive driving behavior are obtained from the following entry that was recorded for the same episode:
"I should cut down on how fast I'm driving and maintain the required speed limit. I am in the middle lane and yet I am driving like an aggressive person in the left lane. I could be increasing my chance of becoming a victim on the road. If the police pulls me over and gives me a ticket it's nobody else's fault but my own. I should follow the rules. I don't want others to get a bad impression of me and think that I'm a speed demon."
Reasoning about propriety is evident in "I should maintain the proper speed limit" and "I'm driving like an aggressive person" which also indicates self-evaluation ("aggressive"). Propriety as well as morality is involved in the driver's reasonings regarding the self-attribution of error. ("It's nobody else's fault but my own"), and the entry "I don't want others to get a bad impression of me" reveals this person's image management techniques. In the following entry the driver seems to be overwhelmed with the reasoned consequences of his action:
"I am thinking to myself I could have killed the guy back there. I am so careless. He must be swearing at me and saying what an idiot I am. I could have smashed up my brother's car."
Note that this self-analysis includes imagining what the others are thinking, feeling, or saying ("He must be swearing..."). Thus, reasoning about a driving situation or attributing an error to oneself are instances of cognitive driving behavior.”

The Driver's Sensorimotor Self


”For this segment of the record, the driver spoke of the following in connection with the same episode:
"I'll driver at the required speed limit and get to my destination safely. I am leaning slightly forward in my seat rather than my normal slightly reclined position. I have both hands on the steering wheel rather than my normal one [hand]. And I can feel my temperature rising."
”Here the person is giving some details on motor behavior and the sensation of getting warmer. Some of this information might be available to an observer of camera ("I am leaning slightly forward in my seat"), but the meaning of this act would remain obscure without the self-witnessing report ("rather than my normal slightly reclined position") or would require complex instrumentation ("I can feel my temperature rising"). Thus, describing sensations or motor actions are instances of sensorimotor driving behavior.”

 

 

The affective refers to how you are aware of what your physical actions or verbal actions are.  Cognitive is being aware of other people’s physical and verbal actions.  And sensorimotor is being aware of your sensations.  All three aspects in the threefold self that are cited above are related to driving episodes.  They can happen so quickly that you don’t even realize it even happened.  By becoming aware of these aspects we can better ourselves as drivers as written by Dr. James in, “Affective, Cognitive, and Sensorimotor Aspects of Traffic Psychology”.

 

Citation:  “Affective, Cognitive, and Sensorimotor Aspects of Traffic Psychology.” Internet. 8 Oct. 2001. Available:

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/459f96/rmitsui/reports/report3.html

 

 

 

“One principle in Traffic Psychology is that driving behavior includes the affective domain (feelings and motives), the cognitive domain (thoughts and judgments), and the sensorimotor domain (sensory input and motor output). These three aspects, occur so quickly that it often seems like a reaction. But since they all affect each other, if we can recognize them, we can control our actions behind the wheel. Which makes us all better drivers. All three are present in any single traffic behavior.”

 

 

 

 

 The threefold self can be imbedded into any given situation.  Here is an example from the Internet that includes the threefold self (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor). We can become aware of any situation and become better people in general.

This particular article is focused on how students really don’t know how to use the library affectively and how the three aspects (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor) are intertwined within it.

 

Citation:  “Microdescriptions of Library Research: A Longitudinal Study of the Affective, Cognitive
and Psychomotor Behavior of Users” Diane Nahl and Dr. Leon James,

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/nsf.html

 

“These three domains of library user behavior are comprehensive,
encompassing the entire range of human behavior as described in
contemporary psychology. Overt acts (psychomotor) are seen as
effects or consequences of prior inner acts, specifically, mental
acts (cognitive), and motivational acts of the will (affective). For
example, the perceptual and motor action of pressing a function key
on an online catalog (psychomotor domain), is the result of knowing
and understanding online function keys (cognitive domain), which is
placed under the control of the motive to find a needed reference
(affective domain). The interaction between feelings (affective
domain), thoughts (cognitive domain), and actions (psychomotor -
domain) is the subject of modern theories in psychology.” 3

”In general, the current content of orientation courses and
library proficiency tests covers the cognitive domain for the most
part, and to some extent, involves the psychomotor domain. 4 The
affective domain in library use has received less attention, though
some writers are clearly aware that the library user has feelings and
that these affect the search process. 5 The concept of affective
library search errors recognizes that users' freedom of access to
information is restricted by irrational fears or unreasonable frust-
rations. This becomes evident when inspecting user self-reports, as
in the following samples”:
"I was totally lost when I first walked into Hamilton."
"I can tell you that I had great apprehensions at the thought of
having to do a library research paper."
"It shocked me to visit a library with five floors compared with
one floor, and I felt that I was in another world."
"Two weeks ago I walked into the library lost and confused."
"Here is another description of the hectic time I spent looking
for information on diet."
"I was frustrated when many of the articles that I looked up in
the indexes were in magazines not carried at the library."
"The most frustrating thing was trying to look for articles in
the indexes."
"Walking around the library with a dazed and confused look on my
face wasn't unusual."

 

The article above suggests that students do not know all what needs to be known of libraries.  The motivational acts are the affective where students are to get motivated in order for them to use what the library offers.  Either by having students talk to other students about using the library or saying to oneself that by using the library I will get the knowledgeable information that I need for my report and I might even get a good grade on it.  The cognitive is the consequences of prior inner acts, your mental acts.  For example one may be thinking that, “why should I go to the library I don’t know what to do there anyway” this can cause the person or student to not go to the library or even start perceiving that they are stupid.  Sensorimotor, is the actual knowing and understanding or functions within the library.  Knowing how to use the card catalog or searching through the newspaper articles on slides is the ability to use your motor skills.  To actively use your motor skills one needs to be motivated to get there and think positive thoughts while doing a particular task. 

This table explains how you change your affective, cognitive and sensorimotor from bad to good, pertaining to driving.  The good is labeled as skills and the bad is labeled as errors.

 

Citation: “Microdescriptions of Library Research: A Longitudinal Study of the Affective, Cognitive
and Psychomotor Behavior of Users” Diane Nahl and Dr. Leon James,

http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/nsf.html

 

Table 1
Driver Behavior as Skills and Errors in Three Behavioral Domains

SKILLS

AFFECTIVE

COGNITIVE

SENSORIMOTOR

I've got to be careful here. Don't want to cut anybody off.

This person looks like he's in a hurry to get in. I better let him in.

(Gesticulating and smiling:)Go ahead. You go first.

ERRORS

AFFECTIVE

COGNITIVE

SENSORIMOTOR

I wish I coul give that guy a piece of my mind.

I don't think people like that should be allowed on the road.

(Yelling:) "You stupid idiot, why don't you watch where you're going!"

 

HIERACHY OF MOTIVES

As the threefold-self functions through affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor behavior, the hierarchy of motives circles around emotions, feelings, and values and without motives, the three-fold self would not be operational.   How do we achieve these motives?   What is the reason for our emotions, feelings and values?   This table below shows why people do what they do…

 

Citation: “Motivations Why do People”?  By:   Søren Askegaard, 02-03-99

 http://www.busieco.ou.dk/undervis/sba/show4/sld001.htm

 

 

First lets examine emotions in feelings.  Emotions defined earlier are sensations that one feels when they are angry, sad, happy, excited, etc.  But what motivates are emotions to occur?  According to Patricia S. Greenspan a professor at the University of Maryland in the Philosophy Department quotes below:      

 

Ciatation:  Emotions and Reasons: An Inquiry into Emotional Justification, By: Patricia S. Greenspan, 1988

http://www.inform.umd.edu/EdRes/Colleges/ARHU/Depts/Philosophy/Faculty/PGreenspan/Res/erabs.html

 

Patricia S. Greenspan, Emotions and Reasons: An Inquiry into Emotional Justification (New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1988)

Abstract

“Philosophers have traditionally tried to understand the emotions and their bearing on rationality and moral motivation by assimilating emotion to other categories such as sensation, judgment, and desire. In recent years, moving away from the Cartesian identification of emotions with particular sensations, many philosophers have embraced "judgmentalism," the view that emotions are essentially evaluative judgments or beliefs, with only an accidental connection to the feelings and impulses we intuitively take as "emotional." Anger, for instance, either is or entails the belief that one has been wronged and that the source of injury or offense deserves punishment.”

 

 

 

This different view looks not at what motivates emotions, but emotions motivate behavior.  This is written by Geoffrey Potts a Cognitive Psychologist with a Ph.D from the Department of Psychology and the Institute of Coginitive and Decision Sciences at the University of Oregon, in Eugene, Oregon.

 

Citation: Rice Information Technology, By: Geoffrey Potts, Spring 2001

http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~gpotts/emotion/content.html

 

Course content for Emotion and Motivation

“This course could simply be called simply "Emotion"; we won't be covering what would traditionally be called "motivation". We'll spend little time, if any, looking at the primitive precursors of emotion, primitive motivations like the "four Fs" (Feeding, Fighting, Fleeing, and Mating). On the other hand, it's not unreasonable to think that emotion is what motivates behavior or is, at least in part, the subjective experience of motivational systems at work. Why do we select certain things to perceive and not others? Why do we attend to some things and not others? Perhaps motivational systems, experienced as emotions, direct our "cold" cognitive systems. If you'd like an example, in the middle of the next lecture or professional talk you attend try standing up and singing some Gilbert & Sullivan. Bet you can't do it. Now sure you can come up with lots of logical, emotionless reasons not to disrupt a talk but the bottom line is that it would feel embarrassing -- emotion is regulating your behavior.”

 

 

This next citation is an example of a community manner that lead to motivate emotions in the state of Colorado.

 

 Citation: Rocky Mountain News, October 27, 2000  By: Karen Abbott

http://www.denver-rmn.com/election/1027adwa3.shtml

 

Growth-control ads tap                                                                 into emotions

Amendment 24 motivates supporters, detractors to evoke state's beauty

By Karen Abbott
Denver Rocky Mountain News Staff Writer


“Purple mountains. Leafy trees”.

“Both sides of the growth debate agree that Colorado's beauty is what unites us. But the state's loveliness is depicted in two different ways — each aimed at evoking voters' emotions — in television commercials urging citizens to enact or reject growth-control Amendment 24.”

“Backers of the proposed amendment to the state constitution, which is designed to control growth, are running a TV spot that shows smog-shrouded mountains, barely visible behind a sprawl of ticky-tacky houses. In the foreground, an earth-moving machine spews black smoke and tears at the ground. Angry horns sound in traffic jams.”

 

 

Feelings as I defined earlier in my own words are actions that are acted upon our emotions.  It is cycles that we experience everyday whether it is good or bad.  What motivates are feelings?  Mary Alice Gunter the author of  “Exploration of Feelings Models from Instruction: A Models Approach” displayed by Bill Kimball from the University of Vermont lists seven steps to the exploration of feelings.

 

Citation: “Exploration of Feelings Models from Instruction: A Models Approach”, By:  Mary Alice Gunter pg. 287

http://www.uvm.edu/~wkimball/edsc216/gunter1.html

 

Exploration of Feelings
Models from Instruction: A Models Approach
by Mary Alice Gunter et. al.: Page 287

http://www.uvm.edu/~wkimball/edsc216/

Steps for teaching the exploration of feelings model:

·         1) List all facts perinent to conflict:

·         2) Make and support inferences about how the persons involved were feeling and why:

·         3) Describe similiar experiences:

·         4) Describe fellings at the time and reasons for those feelings:

·         5) Compare feelings with the feelings of the people studied (if appropriate):

·         6) Draw conclusions, form generalizations, and support:

·         7) Evaluate:

 

 

Values are things that are of importance to use.  It is what we believe in and values are usually something we learn from growing within in our family household.  Below is a table of Maslow’s Hierarachy of Needs.

 

Citation:  “Motivations Why do People”?  By:   Søren Askegaard, 02-03-99

http://www.busieco.ou.dk/undervis/sba/show4/sld004.htm

 

 

At Fortsview High School, in North Carolina I found an article written by Harris Shovelin that is based on how teenagers are lacking in the values area.  A recent survey has found that teens that are not exposed to these values usually are those that are mixed up with drugs, have no respect for others, etc.  Below is  citation of the article and included within are a few high school students views.

 

Citation:  Fortsview High School, North Carolina, By:  Harris Shovelin, December 11, 2000

http://www.gojagwire.com/News/JagRag/vol3no2/teenslackingvalues.htm

 

Teens lacking in values?
Recent survey leaves many questioning their morality

By Harris Shovelin

“From drugs and violence to outright displays of total disrespect, the current generation of teenagers is building a rather distasteful reputation for themselves in comparison to their predecessors. Their often criticized lack of morals leaves many adults and even teens themselves wondering what exactly has gone wrong.”

"People just don’t care anymore. They just do what they want to do, no matter what it does to them or who they care about," said junior Heidi Morgan.

“Others choose to lay the blame elsewhere”.

"Lack of support for schools and their programs definitely plays a role in teens’ lack of morals," said senior Eric Neely.

“Regardless of who or what is responsible, current teens—dubbed "Generation Y" because of their resemblance to Generation X—are involved in various crimes at alarming rates. In a national survey of 8,600 teens, nearly three fourths of those polled said they have at least experimented with alcohol or drugs, with a significant portion admitting to drinking regularly.”

 

 

This last article is from the National Review Online.  The article is aimed at  this point, “Whatever the motives  of the individual terrorist is not a random act.”  Which means they did not just do what they did on September 11, 2001 for no reason there is a motive behind it all.  I choose this particular article because it touches on motives and it is something recent that we all can relate to.

 

Citation: National Review Online

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-mannes081501.shtml

 

Acts of War
Whatever the motives of the individual terrorist, terrorism is not a random act.

By Aaron Mannes, Washington-based writer & Middle East analyst
August 15, 2001 12:30 p.m.

 

ith the June 1 suicide bombing in Tel-Aviv, and the recent bombings in Jerusalem and Haifa, all of Israel's major populations centers have been subject to terrorist attacks. These acts are portrayed as springing from the rage of the Palestinian people. But, whatever the motives of the individual terrorist, terrorism is not a random act. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the PLO are sophisticated organizations with well-defined ideologies and goals.”

“Terrorism is a cynical, calculated strategy that aims at undermining a society's will to defend itself by creating chaos and engendering a feeling of helplessness. It is the ultimate expression of the ends justifying the means. One of terrorism's immediate goals is to goad the recipient into retaliating. Israeli retaliations further radicalize the Palestinian population, eliminating moderate voices and allowing the Intifada to continue. At the same time, the failure of Israeli measures to stop terrorism pushes Israelis towards despair.”

“Terrorism is not confined to Islamic Jihad and Hamas. While presenting itself as the alternative to Muslim fundamentalism, the PLO failed to shut down Islamic Jihad and Hamas. With tens of thousands of men in the Palestinian security services, this failure was not due to lack of means, it