By Daniel Goleman
Chapter 10: The Billion Dollar Mistake
In a study done at a life insurance company, it was found that two out of three clients refused the plan although it would clearly benefit them. One of the executives was curious as to the nature of the frequency of the rejections and initiated a study to find out why the clients were refusing. He theorized that the root of their problem would be an imperfection in the policy or some other minor problem with the product. Surprisingly, it was found that the policy was fine. It was the process and presentation that upset the clients.
The study found that the advisors made the clients feel "powerless, uninformed, inadequete, and suspicious." Additionally the advisors felt "unqualified, incompetent, untruthful, and selfish" about giving the presentation. All of this negativity built a giant obstacle between the sales process and the bottom line.
Working in customer service, I understand the importance of customer service skills such as emotional intelligence. It is essential to always be aware of the client's mood and always try to maintain a sense of pleasantness. When the client strays away from this mindstate, it becomes difficult to conduct business as usual. As a customer I sometimes refuse to buy a product if the sales representative is rude even if the product is flawless. Although this may be a retalitory reaction, nevertheless, it is a common one that can occur if emotional intelligence is not applied to customer service. I agree with Goleman that failure to be emotionally competent can be disasterous for a business.
All of these "yuck factors" can be treated with specific remedies that all can be found within the learning of emotional competency. In the case of the life insurance company mentioned in "The Billion Dollar Mistake," after finding the results of the study, the company agreed to create an emotional compentency course for their employees assuming that following the completion of the course, the advisors will now be driven by their own principles and desires instead of pressure. In turn they will project this outward toward the client and be more convincing by eliciting a sense of trust.
I agree with Goleman's strategy to focus on the root of the problem, the advisor's emotional competency. It isn't until the advisors are changed by remedying the "yuck factors" that the customers will begin to feel comfortable with purchasing the policy. If the emotional competency training is implemented correctly, the company turn around could be significant.
I also agree here. Numbers don't lie. If Sharmayne's sales figures are indicative of what will happen following the emotinal competency course, then it definitely is a good thing. It should be no surprise that many people are not emotionally intelligent. Emotinal competency must be learned as with any other skill. It is definitely in the company's best interest to train the employees.
The point Goleman is trying to make here is that all emotional competencies can be cultivated with practice. Unlike IQ, EIQ has the ablility to constantly improve throughout life. Although maturity is a factor (it is harder to raise EIQ in people 25 and younger as compared to those 29 and older.) and there is a slight difference in EIQ between genders (males are better at self-regulation and females are better at empathizing and social skills), anyone is equally capable of improving their EIQ. The bottom line is that there is good news and one can always improve with effort.
I don't know quite what to make of what Goleman considers "biological support." This support is based on correlational data and in no way concludes causality. However, I have taken Professor Shapiro's Transpersonal Psychology course and I admit that the mindfulness exercises that we did in that class helped me not only to feel better, but to help me with my school work. I felt more attentive in class and did not procrastinate as much. The results were so positive that even now I try to take the time to practice mindfulness through meditation at least 2-3 times a week.
In another study it was found that supermarket managers often knew what needed to be done in certain situations, yet for some reason or another, they fail to do it. This is the difference between what Goleman calls declarative knowledge (talking the talk) and procedural knowledge (walking the walk). For cognitive and technical training, declaritive knowledge may be enough. Emotional intelligence training involves behavior modification, and needs procedural knowledge as well.
I also agree here that both types of knowledge are necessary in effective job performance. I see too many people who know what they should do but don't because it takes more time and effort, or they may simply prefer to do things "their way."
The written test for getting one's drivers permit unfortunately only teaches declarative knowledge. One of the questions asks what to do if a pedestrian crosses against the red in front of your car. While the obvious correct answer is to allow them to finish crossing before continuing, you'd be surprised at how many people speed up to scare them or swerve dangerously around them or pound on their horn.
Again Goleman uses his knowledge of the biology of the brain in an effort to support his argument. He claims that an action of habit has dominant pathways for nerve impulses in the brain. If this path becomes too strong, soon it will seem like it is the only available choice. Therefore, the brain needs to be "rewired" to stop the bad habit. A new, better habit must be programmed in to replace the older one. The ultimate test comes when the new habit is performed spontaneously.
Although I agree with the nature of habits and habit forming, I am somewhat apprehensive about accepting what Goleman credits as "biological evidence." He assumes causation from correlational data which make this biological "evidence" weak at best.
However, he does bring up an important point about training yourself to lose older bad habits and acquire new ones. When I first began to work I possessed an immature arrogance that made it difficult for me to follow the old saying, "the customer is always right." However, after years of training, I can now follow this belief spontaneously, thereby satisfying the ultimate test.
Here is one ultimate test for drivers: If someone cuts you off, what is your initial reaction? Although I can now calm myself fairly quickly, my initial reaction is still anger. But I'm still working on this area so someday I may pass this ultimate test for driving.
I disagree with Goleman on this point. Emotional intelligence is, in fact, a cognitive skill. He oversimplifies emotional competency as a habitual process when good habits are merely the by-product of emotional competency. Emotional competency is a cognitive skill because it involves being aware of your emotional mind state and actively controlling it. We are not slaves to our habits, much less to a specific neurological path in the brain. Good habits simply help with the process of emotional competency; they don't run it. Emotional competency must be taught in the classroom. Although this teaching process is far from perfected, teaching in any other manner is not only impractical, but ludicrous in spite of Goleman's biological "evidence." (again correlational, not causal)
Goleman considers this company to have used the "spray and pray" method of teaching emotional intelligence. Here the company "sprays," exposing everyone to a mediocre training program and then the executives "pray" that some will retain the lessons that were taught or merely hope that something was taught at all.
I was amazed that so many companies would spend so much money so blindly. If I were spending millions and millions of dollars on training emotional competency, I would make sure that everyone comes out of that program emotionally intelligent.
Although it would be a good idea to analyze the teaching technique that is used in Hawaii's driver education program, I doubt that it will ever be done. The process of analyzing would be difficult due to the nature of the incidence of accidents that reflect upon poor driving competency (they are infrequent and random events).
The amount of money discussed in this section boggles my mind. Although I agree that $500,000 to repair a potentially $240 million mistake is a bargain. I personally would never invest that much into emotional competency. Of course, I speak from a perspective of someone who makes about $10,000 anually...
"Hard-nosed" evaluations are rare. Most often evaluations are nothing more than happy sheets inquiring whether or not you enjoyed the presentation. I get a lot of these at work. Often there is a inservice that we are required to attend, yet when we evaluate the presenter, we are often asked whether we found the topic interesting or enjoyable. People may, at most, talk about it for a day or so before reverting back to old habits. More companies should be "hard-nosed" in this evaluation process unless they enjoy wasting time and money.
2. Assess the Individual: Tailor the training to the individual's needs.
3. Deliver Assessments with Care: Remember to give "artful critiques."(see My Oral Presentation File)
4. Guage Readiness: Train only when the employee is ready to learn.
5. Motivate: Inform them how it will help them to do their job.
6. Make Change Self Directed: Have them choose their own goals. Other people's goals will have no meaning. This is not a case of "one size fits all."
7. Focus on Clear, Managable Goals: Create a workable plan without unrealistic goals.
8. Prevent Relapse: Turn lapses and slip-ups into opportunities to enforce the lessons that were taught.
9. Give Performance Feedback: Provide specific and immediate feedback, not fuzzy accounts.
10. Encourage Practice: Look for opportunities to implement what was taught.
11. Arrange Support: Build a network of support for the person who is attempting to change.
12. Provide Models: Lead by example.
13. Encourage: Support the change, no matter how small.
14. Reinforce Change: Reward with praises, a raise, or increased responsibility.
15. Evaluate: Don't forget to evaluate the training.
While I agree that this can be essential for the general curriculum for many colleges, I believe that the undergraduate course requirements are quite extensive as they are now. If we were to implement these courses into the core requirements some courses should be dropped to ensure that it is possible to graduate in four years. If the study found that this program was so effective, such a program should ultimately be required of all drivers before they get their license. Additinally, if people need to invest this much time into acquiring a license, they may not be so quick to take advantages and abuse the privelege of driving.
Emotional competencies help us to find and keep jobs. Depression accompanied with the loss of a job is like being in double jeopardy. Each feeds off the other until the person is stuck in an endless downward spiral. The class helps by teaching skills to escape from this mess. One skill that is taught is optimism. This helps the person cope with rejections that are inevitable anytime anyone is looking for work. They emphasize that dispair isn't a marketable goal.
It was also found that these jobs grads earned more than $6420 more than those who did not go to the training course after their second year back at work. In fact, the estimated lifetime earnings for the emotionally competent individuals were $48,000 more than the earnings of the rest. Emotional competency not only helps people to get and keep jobs, it also helps them to excel at what they do.
I think that if this jobs program is so effective, it should be implemented into the unemployment process. In my opinion, there are too many people on unemployment. I was once on unemployment and the program only provided money, but didn't actually help me find a job. As long as I kept trying to get a job, I was recieving an unemployment check, regardless of my ability to get a job. I think that we should be helping get these people off of unemployment, not just handing them free money (though I must admit, it was a good deal at the time).
My Report1: How Music Affects Drivers: Should We Rock While We Roll?
My Report 2: Being a Driving Buddy: Backseat Driving as a Favor