|
|
| Instructions for this report |
| Introduction to TSRA |
| Discussion of TSRA topics |
| Other Web Pages that relate to DWI |
| Comparison to other G8 students |
| Conclusion |
TSRA stands for Traffic Safety Research Abstracts/Applications. The NCAAD (National Commission Against Drunk Driving) provides this Web Site to those who are interested in the research done on areas related to drunk driving. It focuses on these six topics: Youth and Adolescents, Young Adults, Chronic Drunk Drivers, Using Technology to Prevent DWI, Treatment of DUI offenders, and Legal Sanctions, but also allows readers to search for related topics they might have available (TSRA search). The site presents the facts and figures in a summarized form which is easy to read over quickly. It also suggests ways to apply this information to prevent drunk driving. After each section, there is a list of sources which viewers can also click on to find more details.
What is nice about this site is that you
do not need to actually read all of the topics to get most of the information
because they overlap in the facts. Then, if you do read all of the
sections, the repetitiveness is helpful in remembering what you have read.
What I did not like about this site was the lack of definitions. For example,
they do not really explain what interlock devices do or how home arrest
works. I also was not sure if there was an actual difference between DWI
(driving while intoxicated) and DUI (driving under the influence).
back to top
go to end of report
1. Youth
and Adolescents
The main point here is that the typical
methods of presenting facts and using scare tactics are not that effective
at keeping teens from drinking and driving. The article suggests
to change the attitudes of the students by actually involving them in promoting
measures of prevention. Another solution to keeping youths and adolescents
from drinking and driving is to come up with stronger legal penalties,
for example the zero tolerance laws and prosecuting DUI offenders as adults
with permanent records.
2. Young
Adults
The abstract on Young Adults (ages 21-34)
states that they cause the most alcohol-related "accidents," probably because
of feelings of being invincible. It seems that social rewards (like
acceptance and fun) take priority over the the consequences of taking risks.
This idea of doing something even if one knows it is wrong is thought to
be a "normal" behavior of this age group. The experts again found
that scare tactics do not work. The approach they suggest is to focus
on how alcohol causes impairment and what the consequences of drinking
and driving have on one's self and loved ones. The goal is honest
communication which promotes empowerment and self-control. The messages
can be focused to specific groups (male and female), and can be placed
at popular meeting places or the workplace.
3. Chronic
Drunk Drivers
They are defined as people who abuse alcohol
or other substances and continue to drive under the influence. It is noted
here that the majority of chronic drunk drivers are white males ages 21-34.
Because of the high death-injury figures and the increasing economic costs
caused by chronic drunk drivers, they suggest a different strategy. The
standard license suspension works on the general population, but because
chronic drunk drivers are alcoholics, their judgment is impaired. Also,
time between the arrest and the revokation of the license is too long to
be effective, it needs to be taken away at the moment of the arrest. They
find that 80% of those whose licenses were suspended continue to drive
because the chances of being caught are slim (the arrest rate probability
is 1 in 2000). For this group, jail time and community service is also
ineffective so they suggest taking away the vehicle. Other ways to deal
with the problem are interlock programs (a device to put on the car), counseling,
and home arrest.
4. Using
Technology to Prevent DWI
In this abstract, they elaborate on some
solutions that were given in other sections. For example, they mention
that the ignition interlock devices reduced recidivism when the car is
equipped but then go back up when they are taken off. They also say that
the home arrest (electric monitoring) can be more effective than jail time,
and it is more cost effective because the DWI offenders have to pay for
it. Another technological idea is to screen DWI offenders for alcohol dependency
before sentencing in order to provide the right help to reduce the chances
of recidivism.
5. Treatment
of DUI Offenders
This abstract attends to the fact that
most DUI offenders have problems with alcohol and/or drug abuse (70% in
Maryland). In order to reduce the rates of multiple offences of DUI, many
states have come up with remedial interventions. The traditional legal
sanctions of license suspension and jail only work on the general population
and the educational rehabilitation is not effective alone. For multiple
offenders and first time offenders with drinking or drug problems, experts
say that this information can be combined with licensing sanctions, psychotherapy,
counseling, and follow-up supervision (probation officer or aftercare)
to reduce recidivism and alcohol related crashes by 7-9%. They suggest
a 1-2 year program.
6. Legal
Sanctions
The experts come to the conclusion that
there should be harsher penalties for driving drunk and that the laws should
be better enforced. For example, since one can drive drunk 200-2000 times
before getting caught, there should be sobriety check points and definite
punishment. Some other solutions that are provided include: 1) limiting
the availability of alcohol by restricting alcohol outlet density on a
geographical and per capita basis 2) lowering the legal blood alcohol level
to .08% from .1% 3) increasing the price of alcohol through sales tax 4)
enacting zero tolerance laws for drivers under 21...youth caught drinking
and driving should be prosecuted as adults 5) creating server intervention
and server liability laws.
back to top
go to end of report
2. DWI
This page on Driving While Intoxicated
has informative charts related to DWI. One shows the fatalities over
the years and another is a BAL chart that has data for both men and women.
It also gives facts under categories such as "what is considered drunk"
and "what happens when you drink." For example alcohol consumption
causes poor judgment, slower reflexes, loss of concentration, and
vision impairment. The main goal of this site is to educate people
on DWI and help them to make more responsible decisions.
3. ADD
Against Drunk Driving is an organization
in Canada that was started because of a death caused by an alcohol-related
crash and someone felt the need to do something about it. Their goal
is to "reduce death and injury caused by impaired drivers through educational
means." The members of this group include victims of these crashes,
teens, volunteers, and concerned citizens. They have links to children's
activity pages, interesting facts, and other related sites. It is
a good idea to incorporate all ages, especially children because their
lives can be affected by drunk drivers and eventually they will be faced
with making important decision about alcohol and driving. The facts
given show that drunk driving mortality rates are similar to the United
States. Other facts are in a way common sense that we would not normally
notice. For example, more crashes occur in summer over winter, one-fourth
of them on Saturdays, probably because people go out and party more in
the summer time (especially high school and college students). I
think it could be somewhat effective with the general public but it still
does not directly reach the ones already causing the accidents.
4. BADD
Businesses Against Drunk Drivers, Inc.,
a non-profit corporation, uses the business industry to "combat" drunk
driving. It began in 1987 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin with the idea that
"the workplace is an ideal location to deliver prevention education."
Not only do they provide printed materials and speakers for businesses
and the community, they also have public awareness campaigns and team-up
with restaurants and festival events to create a means of safe alternative
transportation for those who are drinking. They look to create an
ideal place like Norway where the people care about the law, being responsible
by always having a designated driver or cab service when going out drinking
or to parties. It seems to make sense to reach a larger number of
people through the workplace. With both the use of education and
providing prevention means, maybe people will realize the importance of
such efforts.
5. CADD
Campaign Against Drinking and Driving
began in 1985 by two fathers in Great Britain who each lost a child in
separate drunk driving incidents. They were upset at the way
the justice system disregards the feelings of the victims and their families.
They believe that deaths caused by drunk drivers should not be considered
mere accidents. They aim: 1) to gain more support and compensation
for the victims and their families, 2) to reduce the number of drunk
driving deaths and injuries, and 3) to get more realistic sentencing
for DWI offfenders. In order to make things happen, they write to
government committees in attempt to make changes in the justice system
like harsher penalties and ways to make the crimes easier to prove in court.
This group seems to be good advocators of what they believe in. Their
approach of trying to persuade their government to make specific changes
a little at a time makes sense because if the laws are more strict and
carried out as they should be, then people may take them more seriously.
6. MADD
Mothers Against Drunk Driving is a well-known
organization that was started after a 13 year old was killed in a hit-and-run
by a man that was out of jail on bail for two days on another hit-and-run
crash. He had three previous arrests with two prior convictions yet
was able to plea-bargain to vehicular manslaughter. This group of
mothers is both a support group for the victims of drunk driving and an
active voice for prevention of drunk driving. They emphasize that
drunk driving is a violent crime, not just an accident by pointing out
that choice is involved. They push for things like: 1) frequent
and regular use of highly publicized sobriety checkpoints and/or
other high visibility enforcement programs to find and arrest drivers impaired
by alcohol or drugs, 2) mandatory BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) testing
for crashes involving death or serious injury, 3) an anti charge
reduction law so that drunk drivers who have caused death or serious injury
cannot negotiate to a lesser offense, and 4) minimum
security facilities that include assessment and treatment for those convicted.
MADD is convincing because it has a strong following and they make their
voices heard.
7. SADD
Students Against Drunk Driving was created
by a hockey coach who had two players die in separated alcohol-related
crashes. It consists of over 4 million members in about 20,000 chapters
in all grade levels including college, therefore SADD is easy to find on
the Web. The main message is that there is "no responsible illegal
drinking." There are many programs to fight teen drinking and driving
like: 1) Project Graduation - activities for after proms and graduations
that show that you do not need to drink to have fun, 2) Safe Homes
- where the neighborhood and community work together to have parents become
familiar with each other's homes in order to cut down on illegal drinking
and driving, and 3) having students sign contracts that says they
will call for a ride if intoxicated - this means using correct judgment
and helping others in similar situations. The methods of SADD use
the idea mentioned in the TSRA abstracts where getting people involved
in prevention activism can cause a change in attitude. I think that
if they are successful in first getting the students to listen, participate,
and join the organization, then they can have an effect in curbing the
number of crashes caused by drunk driving. Also having sites on the
Web makes it easier to catch the attention of the teen and college age
group.
There was also another interesting site
that I encountered that gave hints on how to defend against DWI and DUI,
but was more of an advertisement for lawyers.
back to top
go to end of report
back to top
go to end of report
When I first started this report, I realized how little I actually knew about DWI. The instructions helped to guide me into what I needed to search for. The abstracts were easy to get through and understand. The next step was surfing the internet for pages that related to the topic. It always takes me a while to remember how to use the search engines the most efficiently, but I managed to find more than I needed. I had to pace myself because if I tried to do too much in one day I would get extremely tired and not look at things carefully. As I worked, I checked on the progress of my classmates to make sure I was on the right track. When I do finish up, I need to check on the way I word things to avoid plagarism.
back to top
go to end of report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|