|
I enjoyed Eric's report because it was easy to read in terms of fonts and color selection. I did feel, however, that his report was a little boring to look at. The font was black with a white background and the paragraphs and titles were very sterile looking. He did a thorough search through Journal database searches, web searches, generational searches, and through the Rothe textbook. I had an even easier time reading through his report because every subject was categorized and titled so simply. I felt that his report was very short and still lacking of material, though. |
|
Tamar's report was a little more pleasing to the
eye than Eric's was, but actually the grey text was difficult to read against
the colored background. Also, the font she chose was not very easy
to read. There is just no pleasing me. She also included searches
through the Journal database, the web, and the Rothe textbook but I did
not feel that her report was thorough enough, either.
|
|
|
|
Test
Questionnaire by Cara Lucey
This test questionnaire was made by a student
in Dr. James 459, G6 as a part of her report. The questionnaire consisted
of miscellaneous statements that you answer yes or no to. This questionnaire
was very short and concise. I didn't like or agree with all of her
choices for criteria of aggressive driving, but I did enjoy that it was
simple to read and simple to answer. It was very straight to the
point and didn't confuse readers.
Dr
Driving's Test Yourself Toolkit Module 2 Your Driving Personality
This test serves as a demo illustrating how self
tests can operate to assess your driving personality. The items for
this version are based on the full classified inventory of the nine zones
of driving skills. I liked that Dr. Driving's test yourself toolkit
was very thorough. It helped me understand all of the criteria because
it was broken down into the different areas. Affective Safety Issues,
Cognitive Safety Issues, Sensorimotor Safety Issues, Affective Self-control
and responsibility issues, Cognitive self control and responsibility issues,
and Sensorimotor self control and responsibility issues. The
survey was pretty lengthy, howver, and I thought some participants might
get bored or tired of filling it out.
This August 19-28 poll by EPIC/M-R-A of Lansing, Michigan, was based on a driver stress test developed by Dr. John Larson who leads the Institute for Stress Medicine in Norwalk, Connecticut. It asks 40 questions and you reply with a Always, Often, Sometimes, or Never. I enjoyed this particular survey because the questions were very short. However, there were a lot of them. It was interesting how the questions were grouped in similar sections in terms of anger, impatientness, competition, and violence. The questions also seemed to go in order of aggressive degrees. From the lesser aggressive actions to the violent ones. I also felt that the always and never selections were too extreme and therefore unnecessary. Very rarely are you going to be able to say that you have always or never done something. Questions were a little repetitive which I felt may bore the participants, but all in all I enjoyed this survey. |
|
Writing this report was fun and challenging.
When I first started the report I was so excited about the results that
I would be able to uncover and have a better understanding of why Men were
more aggressive than women. After I got my results, however, I was
a little frustrated with my findings as I realized that it was difficult
to make such general assumptions on such a little sample especially since
my range was so wide for the females. I learned that when you set
out to do an experiment, your findings will not always paint the picture
you initially wanted. You have to have an open mind and be ready
to defend and analyze any findings that you might get. Most
of all, my advice to future generations is to have fun with it. I
know it's a school project, but it really is an opportunity for us to act
like real researchers for a semester and uncover interesting findings!
|
|
|