Gender Differences In Driving:

Closing the Gender Gap



Table of Contents




Cara Lucey's Report on Gender Differences in Driving

In the first part of Cara's Lucey's report, she discusses how people's perception of men and women drivers are colored by societal norms, stereotypes, and expectations. All three help to shape what we think of ourselves and how we act as drivers, and how we perceive other drivers. She emphasizes that by our condoning of these views we are in fact helping to perpetuate them, and are contributing to the devastating effects it can incur.
Next, she reviews a study she had conducted which focuses on driving norms. The study assessed each individual's anger, philosophy, feelings of compulsive rushing and competition, and over sensitivity to social pressures. Sixteen participants, eight males and eight females filled out the questionnaires. The results of the study showed that the females scored slightly higher in the areas of anger and philosophy; whereas the males scored slightly higher in the competitive and compulsivity, and over sensitivity areas. However, she felt that the study alone did not adequately show that any differences in driving norms exists between genders. This due to the fact that the study population was too small, and that the test may not have been as valid and reliable as idealized.
Lastly, she encourages future students to explore further the thought processes involved while driving. She suggests finding or developing a test that would examine affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor areas. Also, she recommends having alternative ways to clarify answers such as scenarios, and examples of personal experiences.




G7 E-mail Postings on Gender and Driving

Here we look at G7's responses to beliefs about gender differences among drivers. Several issues were raised who's focus was on gender difference, aggression, perception, and validity.One issue raised was whether gender differences in driving exist, when referring to aggression. Two students shared similar opinions on this issue saying that there was no real difference and that both men and women can be aggressive. Brandi Ashby (G7) wrote:
As we have discussed in class, the people you don't expect to be aggressive behind the wheel are the ones you most need to be concerned about. I suppose that men are more aggressive; however, women are not the sweet non-aggressive creatures some perceive. I read in the Sunday paper that women are increasingly becoming more aggressive behind the wheel.
and Wilfred Lee (G7) wrote:
Is there much of a difference between genders when referring to aggressive driving? I thought women drove as bad as men did. :) Or did I get my facts crossed?
Another student hadn't really thought of gender as being part of the issue concerning aggression. MaryElizabeth Pacheco (G7) replies:
As I have mentioned in an earlier reply, I have not come across much research specifying the gender behind the wheel. I only assumed that because of social norms and characteristic of the male gender, that most aggressive driving is committed by the male gender. I too am interested in the cases where women are responsible. I will start to search the web and its newsgroups. I recommend these student do the same if they haven't already.
At the same time we can see how stereotypes make a big impact on how we perceive things. In MaryElizabeth's situation, the male stereotype influenced her idea of how aggressive men are. In a similar line, discrimination can also affect how we think and feel about others. A Web visitor, Brisaacs, shares his view of bad drivers altogether. He wrote (November 1997):
I hate to say this but it is usually the people of ethnic backgrounds, women, and older people that cannot drive.
Obviously, he has something against others. In response to this statement, Ryan Shintani states:
I think that this person has a few deep rooted problems that he has to deal with before he can tackle the topic of road rage. Let me see what is this man's problems. Well, I gather from his e-mail that he is a racist, a sexist and he discriminates against the elderly. Did I leave anything out? I don't think that this man can see past his own blind vision to see anything else, so it would be the case that he is a very aggressive driver that is trying to defend his way of driving. I wouldn't doubt that he cuts people off or shows that finger on a regular basis. He should really go to some anger management classes or some form of therapy.
Stepping aside from the factor of perceptions, and back to gender differences, some feel that at this time it's difficult to discern whether any differences exist. This is partly due to expectations. In psychology we've learned that sometimes subjects responses are affected by what they feel the experimenter expects from them. Other influences could be that the subjects have a more biased view of themselves, which can be either more positive or more negative. As Ryan Shintani mentions:
As we have discussed in class the study that someone did says that women are more aggressive drivers. I don't think that this study is right. It could have been biased by the way that people answered the questions. I think that term is self-actualization. The males might have wanted to make themselves look better. I think that a study will just have to be genderless, unless a set of questions can be developed that will account for the differences that are afforded to each gender because in certain areas women are more truthful then men, but in others men are more truthful. Well that is just my views on the matter.
Still, another issue confronted by student Wilfred Lee is the idea that maybe our concentration shouldn't really focus on gender, but on the aggression itself. He adds in his response to gender and driving aggression:
Demographics, I think are not as important as treating this problem as a whole. Instead of why men drive more aggressively than women, we should think about why people drive aggressively. By questioning the difference between men and women we are not trying to find a solution in my opinion, but instead just looking for more why's.
Looking at the issue of whether gender plays a role in driving aggression, I feel that this is no real significant difference. Society has changed in many ways on its view of women. Though many stereotypes remain, the differences are now becoming smaller as women take on new roles as independent, self-assured, educated, career oriented individuals. They are no longer succumbing to role of being the fragile, non-aggressive, dependent, homemaker. Not to say that fitting the latter description would be a bad thing, but that having the perspective all women are like that would be ludicrous. Also, in the course Psychology of Women, we've learned that not many differences exist between men and women. Any difference in number is too small to be significant enough, and that majority of the population really falls into the middle. However, the idea that gender is important does manifest itself everyday, despite the realization that gender differences are getting smaller and that women are being wrongly accused of being poor drivers. The idea remains because it is embedded in our society, and changing societal and cultural views are a long and difficult process.
As for the issue on stereotypes and discrimination, I feel that it definitely influences how we look at others. It is all too revealed in the statement made by the web visitor Brisaacs. I feel that this person has a really low self-esteem. It is so low that in order to make himself feel better, he needs to criticize others to make himself look better, and to make him feel about himself. Or, maybe he could have been influenced by societal views. In either way, he sounds as if he is speaking out of ignorance. He provides no data to support him, which is probably because there isn't any.
On the issue concerning whether studies should be directed more at controlling aggression, instead of gender differences I would have to say that neither issue should be neglected. Until we know for sure whether a significant difference exists, we shouldn't brush off exploring the idea that it might. Say for example we shift our focus completely away and concentrate on solely on controlling aggression. If a difference does exist and the origin of the aggression plays a role, than the solution may not work for both genders.
Lastly, my belief about gender differences is that both genders display aggression. Sometime they can be quite similar, and other time they are quite different. For instance, as a child my mom never drove aggressively. In fact, to this day she never really speeds (which if she does is like five miles over the limit, and she's never tailgated or retaliated back at anyone. My sister on the other hand can go off at person who cuts in front of her. I've mentioned my dad's driving before in my report1, which I would have to be less aggressive, though more stressing. As for my brother, he's always been pretty in control, but when irritation or anger sets in... he will speed, tailgate, cuss, stick middle, and do everything in the book to tick the other person off. All the while, he seems pretty calm outside, and in control of the car. However, I did have the idea that although women drivers can be just as aggressive they aren't as risky when retaliating. I guess I got that from my own personal experiences with my family. Being the youngest of four children, I was always being driven around by everyone... my parents, sisters, and brother. So, I got to be in all kinds of driving situations. As for my own aggression, I feel that I fit the stereotype of being non-aggressive. But, I have to mention that I'm a relatively new driver (3 years), and that I don't drive everyday. Maybe with more experience I'll be more confident and... more aggressive.




Newsgroups on Gender and Driving

Newsgroup discussions are really important in that they reflect what people believe and know about various issues. In these discussions, people can hears others' thoughts on the subject and can even find answers to their questions. In my search with Deja News, I found some newsgroups I felt reflected society's thoughts on women drivers.

Subject: Re: Women drivers
From: anna@warman.de.MY_BRA.mon.co.uk (ANNA Warman)
Date: 1998/04/2
Message-ID: <3547970e.1723166@news.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: uk.local.london
[More Headers]

zonker@teletubbies.net (Zonker) put digits to keyboard and typed:
>Do women drivers, who spend the same amount of hours driving as men, with
>similar driving experience have similar accident rates? Me thinks so.

The trouble with all this, as no doubt Andrew would agree, is that we need
to be far more precise with our data to draw any conclusions. The first
problem is that men have very varying hours of driving themselves.
Let's take those who are in jobs which keep them on the road all the time - sales and marketing staff. I would suggest there would be very little difference in the statistics. But that isn't because the hours of driving are similar, but because the women in these fields are not typical of women in general. These women don't mind being on the road, travelling around, being away from home. These are career women with strong ambitions. They are working in what is generally a male-dominated field. Without any reflection on their femininity, they have what is traditionally a more male role, and therefore are going to be strong-willed, assertive and determined. In
all likelihood, they will also drive like men - i.e. more assertively than many women drivers.
>I just happen to suspect that women and men of similar age groups, with similar
>driving experience, men drive more than those women. Hence, since women spend
>less time driving, they have less accidents?

But that doesn't follow. You've got two points here and I'd like to tackle both. The second one first. If you spend less time driving, you are going to be less experienced and if you are less experienced, you are more likely to have an accident, because you lack the practice and ability to foresee potential dangers.
A classic example is the fact that I do far more driving than my husband because he commutes to work by train, and I, by car. Therefore, we have only one car and it's in my name. When he recently drove it (for the first time in a while) to visit a friend in north London, he was involved in an accident. He was actually trying to avoid an accident ahead of him and the car in front, also taking evasive action, collided with him. I wasn't there, so I don't know exactly how it all happened, but I couldn't help wondering whether because he was out of practice, he possibly failed to foresee it before it was too late.
Now, onto the first part of your comment above. Some time ago, I conducted a survey about this at work following a discussion about the relative merits of male vs. female drivers. It transpired that while all the females were very happy and confident drivers, if their partner's were with them, almost invariably their partner's drove. Most had never even questioned this until it was brought to their attention. Why is this? Lots of sociological answers that I'm not going to go into here, but I'm sure most reading this can work it out for themselves.
ANNA, who, to bring this back on topic, will note that driving in
London is very different to driving elsewhere in the country...
http://www.plsys.co.uk/~anna
To reply by email, first remove .MY_BRA.

My Comments:

I can't really say if I agree with Anna's answer to Andrew's question about women and men drivers with same driving experience having similar accident rates. It's hard to say because I haven't heard about any studies on that. However, Anna's response does sound plausible, but I don't think that we could exclude other women drivers who aren't in predominantly male fields. For example, a friend of mine worked at a design house in San Francisco. She designed patterns, cuts, etc so she wasn't in a position where she had to be aggressive. She's a good driver with a great track record (so far), and yet I know that she's an aggressive driver because I've rode with her hundreds of times. She does spend a lot of time on the rode, but it doesn't have to do anything with her occupation. She just likes to drive.
About the second question about whether women have less accidents because they drive less, I would have to agree with Anna in that I do feel it's the opposite. Practice does help to make you a better driver, and if a person who drives less has less accidents, I bet it's because they hardly drive at all. If you don't drive... you can't get into an accident unless you're a pedestrian or passenger, but that would be getting of the main idea. As for Anna's comment about women having their male partners drive when they're together... I would have to say that majority of the time it probably does happen that way. But even though it may be the norm right now, it could change. For years it's been my sister who drives when she's with her boyfriend (she has less experience than he does), but it because she drives better than he does! Ironic isn't it?! Girl power!


Subject: Re: Driving women-a public danger
From: "Debbie Marr"
Date: 1998/04/03
Message-ID: <01bd5eef$870fdb80$728d11cb@debbiem.mpx.com.au>
Newsgroups: aus.cars
[More Headers]

Men or women drivers? Check out the statistics for fatalities from road accidents. See what age and sex the majority of them are. Then ask yourself who are the better drivers.
Peter Marr.

My Comments:

I'm a little confused with this statement, but my guess is that he believes that women are the better drivers. I deduced that from the fact that he used the female name "Debbie" to send his message, and he's sending a reply to the message that women drivers are a public danger. Also, I'm not sure what the statistics are but the feeling I get is that the worse accidents occur with male drivers. On the other hand... it could be that Mr. Marr is really just being sarcastic??


Subject: DOOL: Women Drivers
From: GC
Date: 1998/04/08
Message-ID: <352C3A07.2C4B@cam.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps.misc
[More Headers]

First a disclaimer: This is by no means a criticism of REAL women drivers, who we all know are impeccable drivers.
Now the comment:
Why does the Salem DMV allow women to drive? Every time (almost) a woman takes the wheel, she ends up in the ditch or hugging a tree. Laura just had an accident, Sammie had a couple, Jen had a few (not counting the fake one last month), etc. Furthermore these accidents always happen on a deserted road, never in the city.
Gary C.

Most of you won't want to hear this, but I've found that the most dangerous drivers are middle-aged men. They are probably competent, but road rage turns them into idiots.
I've never really had any problems with women drivers. e.g. yesterday I had a close encounter with a 60-year-old bloke who thought a "watch for traffic" sign means to give way to them. There's no arguing with these dead heads, you just have to play passive and get rid of them.
Mike.

P.S. Like anything else, there are exceptions.


Cuong Tran [ENS] wrote:

Alexander Hinz wrote:

>>Driving women-a public danger! Many people have the opinion, that women are
>>the better driver, because they are very careful. But I and a lot of friends
>>think different. The caution only depends on fear and ignorance
>>towards cars function. General I have nothing against women, but I often
>>made this experience in the daily traffic. What's your opinion?

>Yes and No. I'm not saying I'm the best and safest driver on the roads, but
>what I find most disturbing are these young girls driving small-medium sized
>cars and zooming in and out of traffic. That's what scares the crap out of me.
>As for being more careful ... NO. They put too much faith in the cars, and
>should anything occur, the car will get them out of danger. WRONG. And the only
>other times, women drivers really get to me are the pre- and post-school hours.
>What an utter chaos. Imagine, two/three/a damn bunch of screaming kids, with mum
>in the 4wd tailgating you, so you drive quicker, and so they can get rid of
>their kids faster. aaarrrggghhh!!!! I'm glad I'm not on the roads then...
>Anyway, my 2c worth to the pot.

>Cheers, C.,
>Cuong Tran BSc(Hons)

My Comments:

In this discussion several thoughts are shared about women drivers. The first I'll address is the comment made by Mr. Hinz whose belief is that women's so called caution is really fear and ignorance. I think that he's the real fearful and ignorant one. It sounds like he didn't even have any women in his discussion with his friends, so how can he really know what women feel or know on the road. He'd be surprised at the fact that many women are taking on jobs that were earlier held only by men, and that women are much more knowledgeable about cars now than they did before. I have female friends who've learned how to change their tires, oil, etc. so that they can do it themselves and won't have to rely on any "man."
The second comment made by Cuong Tran reflects how young females perceive themselves as being completely safe in their cars. I hardly doubt that you can attribute these thoughts to only young girls because I know a lot of guys who've gotten into numerous accidents, some to where they've even demolished their cars, because they think their car can do anything and they'll be okay. And as for the comment made about mothers speeding to drop off their kids, well I would have to say that anyone in a similar situation would want to do the same... man or woman. Also, it just so happens that most times the duty of dropping the children off to school, practice, the sitters, etc. fall on to the mothers.
As for Gary and Mike's comments... Mike's got some age discrimination going on, but for the sake of keeping in tune with our topic I won't go into that. Gary's comment about women drivers gave me mixed ideas. It told me that women drivers aren't as dangerous as men, in the sense that they don't get into accidents where other cars are concerned. At the same time he's saying that women drivers are poorly skilled in that they bang everything else up. Unfortunately, I don't know what the facts are on that so I wouldn't really know what to say.
Searching the web for sites on women drivers I found one that showed some differences between young male and female drivers. The site is by the NRMA Insurance company, who probably put it up to explain the differences in insurance for male and female drivers under the age of twenty-five. Okay, their main objective is to sell insurance... nonetheless, it has some interesting facts on this subject s and I think it's worth looking up.
Another site I saw that I thought was pretty interesting is She's No Lady: The Experience and Expression of Gender Among Women Taxi Drivers. This site shares the experience of being a woman taxi driver in a predominately male occupation. Her list of topics are: This site is interesting because of the many obstacles she needed to face such as fitting in with the other male drivers, and overcoming stereotypes.




Looking at Earlier Generations' Reports on Gender and Driving

Searching through the generations, I had no luck finding a report on gender differences in driving. I guess no one decided to research it. Well actually I there was one student... Cara Lucey, whose paper I had discussed earlier in this report. However, I did another search on the Generational Curriculum's CSS search engine and I found one report I felt relates enough to our topic.
In Christine Tomooka's report, The Stereotypes of Women Drivers: From male conducted research and analysis from my perspective, she attempts to uncover the origins of women stereotypes, and in particular the stereotype that "women are poor drivers." Next, she describes the impact made on society when women began to drive. She then goes on to discuss findings of her research on gender differences in driving.
One theory examined by Christine is that because society thought of women as being delicate, clean, and feminine they needed to be protected from the corruption of society. It meant that women were incapable of taking care of themselves and that they needed to stay in their place, which in my mind meant at home taking care of the family.) Christine then goes on to explain how early women drivers affected the social fabric. As women gained more responsibilities during World War I, they began learning how to drive and travel far distances. This in turn changed the social status of women, and showed that they were not the weak and fragile persons thought of previously. As the number of women drivers increased, it also reflected how much women were becoming less dependent on men. Threatened by this, stereotypes became a means for men to keep women in their place. In support of this idea, Christine researches several studies by male researchers dealing with perception of driving skill, seat belt use, correlations between personalities and convicted drivers, and correlations between personalities and moving violations of women. One study showed interesting findings, as stated by Statistisches Bundesamt:
young male drivers are often involved in accidents caused by speeding and veering off the lane, whereas young female drivers are over represented in accidents at intersections or during lane changes.
Despite those results, her overall researched implied that women drivers were equal, if not better, to men.




Rothe's View on the Psychology of Gender and Driving

In review of the book Challenging the Old Order by J.P. Rothe, we see that gender differences in driving can be applied to several chapters in the book, all focusing on society's influence. In chapter one, we look at the section called "The Social and Cultural Environment." Here it shows how the social and cultural realm can affect safety even though it may be unrelated to traffic safety. It relates to our topic because of the changing social view of women. Women are being seen as more aggressive and less timid, and that can have an affect on how other drivers see them on the road. In the same lines chapter two discusses the idea of driving as an individual experience, in which the driver needs to recognize the importance of the social context with which the driver functions in. The social context involves everyone's influence on the driver such as family, the community, and organizations. Taking an experiential or phenomenological approach to the driving experience, Rothe states:
we become more aware of the dialectic relationship between a driver's behavior and attitudes and the constant, all-pervasive social influence on the driver.
In chapter seven, we define social issues which Rothe describes as:
public artifacts. That is, certain situations, events, or behaviors have been defines and categorized according to criteria that penetrate a public consciousness.
I firmly believe that gender differences are a social issue, and what we think of each gender can influence our behavior and reflect how we feel. A couple of other chapters that we can relate gender differences into are chapters eight and eleven. In chapter eight, the section on media effects discuss how programming content can influence antisocial behaviors, create underrepresentation issues, as well as misrepresent things such as sex-role stereotyping. In chapter eleven Multiperspectivism: The European experience, it talks about how motivation studies support target group programs, to help in safety problems. One safety campaign is directed toward young drivers in which life-style, recreational behavior, culture, and sex-specific differences will be taken into account. At this time I'm not sure of any real differences between the sexes, but the according to this campaign differences exist.
In class, we've discussed the issue of gender stereotypes contributing to the "perceived" differences between male and female drivers, and how these stereotypes are reinforced through media portrayals and cultural norms. We also did a survey about our own driving experiences and here were the results:

MALE/FEMALE DIFFERENCES:

1) Women rate themselves as less aggressive than men rate themselves
2) Women experience more stress than men
3) Women see themselves as driving less aggressively than men see themselves
4) Men feel more competitive than women
5) Men feel more peaceful than women
6) Women support stronger law enforcement and more electronic surveillance than men

EXPERIENCE IN DRIVING:
LESS EXPERIENCED (1 TO 8 YEARS)
MORE EXPERIENCED (9 YEARS AND MORE)
1) Those with more experience see themselves as more aggressive but they feel less stress than those with less experience
2) Those with more experience also feel more competitive and want to drive more dangerously than those with less experience
3) Those with more experience see other drivers as less aggressive while those with less experience see other drivers as more aggressive

CORRELATED PATTERNS
1) Those who rate themselves as good drivers have less fantasies of violence
2) Those who experience more stress are less competitive
3) Those who experience more stress support more surveillance


One thing I wanted to know about this study was whether the experience of the driver had an effect on gender differences because the actual experience of the driver was not mentioned in the gender differences results. Overall, I have to say that as much as I agree with these results, I have to mention that this survey cannot be supportive of gender differences due to the small number of subjects taking the survey. Also, being that we are all college students, it is not representative of the real population.




References

Here are a list of journal articles I found in the Uncover and ERIC Combined databases. The words I used to search with were "gender differences in driving." I came up with at least three references, and when I added "driving attitudes" I found 1 more. I think they more or less address the topic, although most of the studies were done on adolescents.

Harre, N., Field, J., & Kirkwood, B. Gender differences and areas of common concern in the driving behaviors and attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Safety Research. 1996, 27(3),163.

Bear, G. & Rys, G. Relational aggression and peer relations: gender and developmental issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1997, 43(1),87-106.

Hype, J. How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology. 1984, 20(4),722-736.

Smith, K.C. & Others. Gender-related effects in the perception of anger expression. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 1989, 20(9-10), 487-499.

Treimann, K. Adolescent gender differences in alcohol problem behaviors and the social contexts of drinking. Journal of School Health. 1996, 66(8), 299-304.
-The study focused on gender differences in the social context of drinking among 1300 high school students. Four alcohol related problem behaviors were assessed: high intensity drinking, binge drinking, driving while intoxicated, and riding with an intoxicated driver.

Farrow, J. Risk for DWI: a new look at gender differences in drinking and driving influences, experiences and attitudes among new adolescent drivers. Health Education Quarterly. 1990, 17(2), 213
-The study was based on 343 high school sophomores, in which their demographics, family characteristics and influences, drug and alcohol use, perception of driving skill, and personality factors were evaluated. The results showed that females used drugs and alcohol more, and males used the car to enhance their self-efficacy. One finding showed that female attitudes toward DWI were more socially acceptable.

Gilligan, C. & Attanucci, J. Two moral orientations: gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1988, 34(3), 223-237.
-The study evaluated the discussions of 46 males and 34 females dealing with actual moral conflicts. The purpose was the see whether they showed signs of using the justice and care perspective, and if they did, whether there was any relationship between gender and moral orientation. Findings showed that although some gender differences exist, both know and use the justice and care perspective in their morals.




Comparing My Report to Others

One report I looked at which I thought was pretty interesting is Czarina Naranjo's report The "He Said, She Said" in Driving. The report was done on several pages, each section having their own separate page. All the pages were identical in format, which made it easy to remember which report I was reading, as well making it aesthetically pleasing. However, the report does have one down side. In order to view a previous section of the report, you need to link back to the table of contents. It's a little inconvenient when you have to keep switching back and forth. Looking at the content of her report, she relates psychology concepts to our understanding of the issues involved in gender differences, and how it can affect perception. Her main approach to the topic is through women stereotypes.
In Robert Nakagawa's report I noticed that he incorporated discussions from our generation as well as from the previous generation. It was pretty interesting to see how the generations had either differed or expanded on this topic, especially since little research has been done in this area and not much is known. The presentation of his report is simple, not much color... but his use of font variation is nice and helps in distinguishing between speakers.



Conclusion

So far, the students researching this topic have only grazed the surface. Most reports reflect no real existing gender differences in aggression and attitudes. However in light of Christine Tomooka's report, which mentions a study whose findings implicated some gender difference in relation to where accidents occur, it would be interesting to see whether correlations do in fact exist and if they do, how significant enough are they? Future students can create their own study using questionnaires to gather data. The questions could ask what areas have their accidents occurred, what are their past experiences with accidents as children and passengers (where it occurred, what gender was the driver.) Other questions could ask what other variables may have contributed to the accidents such as communication styles, driving skills, math and spatial abilities. These questions could also be further investigated to see whether gender differences occur in those areas as well. Other areas of exploration for gender differences could be people's relationship to their cars, or perception of cars and traffic (who is fearful, knowledgeable, etc.)




Mining the Generational Curriculum My Home Page My Report 1 on:How Music Affects Driving
My Report 2 on:Gender Differences In Driving My Report on the Psychology of Newsgroups My Bookmarks File
My Icons File Our G8 Class Home Page Our G8 Index of All Reports
My Extra Credit Report Dr. Leon James Home Page

mail

Send me a message