Attitudes Driving
Newsgroups:
The Different Perspectives of the Many Drivers of this World
Re: Observing Traffic Laws (was Experiencing
Road Rage)
Date Mon, 22 Dec 1997 00:14:09 -0800
So here was someone who was waiting at a stop
light waiting to turn right. I was coming from her right and could see the car
but could not see inside. Apparently, she had her attention to her left to see
whether there were any oncoming cars. Without waiting to see whether there
were any pedestrians on the right, she made a right turn. I screamed and that
probably made her stop.
On a run a few weeks ago, I was nearly hit in this same way, not once, but
twice within a few minutes. It finally clicked how stupid it was to zip out in
front of a car coming in from the left. It's not a question of right of way,
but of natural driving habits. PLEASE be aware of this!! I'll never do it
again, with one exception: sometimes there's a line of traffic opposing you,
so you know they won't pull out. Often, one can run behind such a car, but
then make sure no other car is coming from the right beyond it!
I can surely understand what these people experience. There are numerous times when this happens to me. However, if I am ever caught in a situation such as this when I want to cross the street but there is a driver wanting to make a right turn and doesn't see me, I just stay there and wait until I make eye contact with the driver before I cross. Many times though, I am unsuccessful at making eye contact and therefore miss my light. However, when the tables are turned and I am the driver, I often forget about pedestrians as well, and feel that I have the right of way no matter the situation. Only when I come really close to banging someone in this exact situation, I become a cautious driver. However, this cautiousness doesn't last very long. I feel that drivers are like that, and unaware of the dangers they pose when they are in a rush or even just because they are in a covered moving vehicle.
Re: Road Rage From "Cybernaut"
Date 7 Jan 1998 17:20:15 GMT
Sadly, I saw my very first dangerous encounter between a cyclist and motorist. I don't know who was at fault but it started when the car and cyclist both turned left through a four-way stop; the cyclist I assume was on the right. I'm not even certain he stopped for the stop sign, he may have just whipped through. Anyway, my attention turned to it when I heard the car's horn honk. In my rear view I saw both finishing the turn and straightening out.
The driver was honking and gesturing at the
cyclist who was gesturing back. Then the car began swerving into the bike, not
hitting him but coming close, causing the cyclist to almost hit the curb. This
continued down the road a bit. I stopped after my turn to see if I could get
the car's plate number but they went by too quickly. I didn't see the cyclist
go by but did check to be sure he wasn't lying in the road. He probably turned
off earlier.
Anyway, it was scary to watch. [ TB]
p.s. as an aside I will say this:
as a cyclist I frequently encounter cyclists while I'm driving that are
totally arrogant and putting themselves into dangerous situations. These are
usually the lycroids with $3000 bikes and immature attitudes. Once I even saw
one approach a red light, look both ways and go through only to have missed
seeing an approaching car and
was right in it's path. The car saw him and slammed on the brakes, pulling to
the right to avoid hitting the cyclist. The cyclist, much to my shock, began
yelling and fingering the driver who was equally shocked. Pissed me off to say
the least.
On my trans-am for '98, I plan to have a camera with me, convienient for
instant shots. Anyone who I feel deliberately tries to run me off the road or
hassles me while I'm riding, discretely gets his picture taken, with licience
plate!!!
I hope some of the links below may be useful to fellow newsgroup readers.
After a couple of recent horn blowing engine revving incidents involving
firstly an 8 tonne truck and a few days latter a medium sized 4WD both aimed
more or less at me and my bike, clearly (to me and a witness) trying to force
me off the road, I have tried to find a handbook of road/bike rules for my
locality without much success. (see below if you want to read
some of the details)
How often do things like this happen and we take the lives of others for granted. So many times when I am driving, I encounter stupid bicyclists who think that they own the road. They also think that they are quick on their two-wheeler as well, however, how fast can one on a bicycle actually go?? Not very, well not as fast as a car. There have been incidents when I almost hit bicyclist, only because they like to ride your tail, and then when you decide to turn, they are right there and you almost hit them. I've also seen incidences such as the one described above, and really I think that it's kind of stupid on both parts. The bicyclist for being an unsafe idiotic rider, and for the driver of the car because he's the one in the car and if he bangs the bicyclist on purpose, who would get hurt? The bicyclist of course. I think if bicyclists want to ride recklessly and risk their lives, well that's their problem, but drivers shouldn't in any way provoke an accident.
Re: Road Rage? Uh, well, maybe.
Date 8 Jan 1998 00:52:59 GMT
A very similar assault occured in the state of Texas last year after that
state passed its concealed carry of weapons permit, allowing its citizens the
means to defend themselves.
The biggest difference was that the agressor was hitting the victim in the
face, repeatedly, and very violently.
The victim shot the agressor dead.
The grand jury said, "Fine with us."
Not long after that a Texas man shot several kids stealing the hubcaps from
his parked car. The grand jury said "fine with us" in that case too. They have
different attitudes about deadly force down there.
Wow! Talk about taking lives and thinking lightly of it. I disagree with this incident and feel that no one is allowed to take a life if their lives aren't at risk. In other words, if the kids were armed and dangerous and were threatening this man's life, then by all means, take the law into your own hands. However, this was an incident over hubcaps of a car. Not really worth the lives of several children. Giving citizens the means to defend themselves is a good thing, but some discretion needs to be taken because people will get trigger happy and soon everyone will be killing each other for any reason.
Subject: solution to road rage
Date Thu, 29 Jan 1998 11:29:43 -0500
SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT! ...enough said.
I couldn't agree with him more!! How many times while driving in the left lane do you end up behind someone going 10 mph under the limit? This happens much too often for me, and it causes me to get upset. Often times if you observe, it is these cars that cause the traffic and aggression on the roads. People get mad at the slow driver in the fast lane and then tries to over take them, and sometimes even showing them the birdie. This sometimes causes accidents because the angry drivers tend to do things and not think about their actions until it's too late.
Re: solution to road rage? No.
Date Thu, 29 Jan 1998 11:45:23 -0800
SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT! ...enough said.
[Jimmy Joseph]
We suspect your driving habits and attitude are part of the problem, not the
solution. We propose a much better solution: legislation designed to permantly
revoke driver licences for anyone twice convicted of speeding, tailgating,
improper lane change, or reckless driving within a 10-yr period. First time
DUI offenders should be permanantly denied a licence to drive as well. We're
pushing for such legislative intervention here in California, as well as bills
designed to divert money into better driver's education at the high school
level. Progressive licencing is also in the works here, which should better
encourage safe driving practices among young people. We urge everyone reading
this to support such legislation in order to stem the rising tide of very poor
driving behavior in our country. ö
Is something like this really effective?? My opinion is that the drivers who get their licenses taken away will still continue to drive, and recklessly too. I don't think some people really care about a license. They will still get behind the wheel. I know this for a fact because some of my friends are like this. They have had their licenses revoked, but they still continue to drive and they continue to be a hazard on the roads.
Re: Road Rage (Was: OAPs and Driving)
Date Thu, 05 Feb 1998 05:41:50 +0000
Distribution: UK Whether or not it is inflammable, and hence capable of
*chemical* combustion. depends on its concentration within the mixture. Yeah,
and if I put alcohol in a sealed jar with ONLY alcohol inside the jar, it
can't burn.
There would be no source of ignition too. Not necessarily true. Get a lens to
focus the sun's rays to a point and
you have ignition temperature inside the sealed jar. What would the point be
focussed on? More to the point, how could it ignite in the absence of an
oxidising agent such as oxygen? This has already been highlighted by Simon.
What do you hope to gain by merely being imitative. Yet more evidence of Duhgs
cluelessness about matters chemical. Oxidation in the absence of an oxidising
agent! What next?? What is next is me pointing out your complete stupidity in
not addressing the point about an ignition source. Seriously, don't you think
it is about time you got your act together in this thread? How you manage to
hold down the position you claim to have is a complete mystery to me.
[ Doug, London, England, UK, EU? UK Radical Campaigns Jump Page -
This is just about two people who are flaring up at one another about who knows what. I just thought that it was kind of funny and weird that people who really don't know each other can be so rude to one another. I think this is an example of how people on the roads who don't know each other, but yet they can be so mean to one another by giving each other the finger and swearing at each other. What is our society coming to?? Why is it so hard to get along with people, especially if we don't know them that well or at all for that matter. What has happened to the courtesty???
Re: Road Rage (Was: OAPs and Driving)
Date 4 Feb 98 14:31:23 GMT
You don't need to work to live in a welfare
state. Whaaaaat? Cough! Choke! What?
ha ha ha ha ha hahahah ha ha hahahaah ha ha ha hehehe he he heh
hooohoooohohaaaaaaaaaahaaaaa aaaaa hooooo hooooo oh oh oh oh hsahahaha
hahahahaahah hahaha hahah hahaha ha ha hahahaha ha ha ahahaha ha ha ha ha ha
hah ahahaha ha ha hahaha ha hahaha hahah ha hahaha haha
Ok, get this, Doug: The only laws which make sense are those which apply
equally to everyone. So, if everyone in a welfare state stopped working, we
would all carry on living happy and contented lives??????
hahahaha ha ha ha hahahahah ah hahaha ha ha hahaha ha ha ha ha
hahahahhahhahhahhahhahhahah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah
hahaahahahhahahahahahaah haha hhaha aaahaha ha a ha hahah aahah
Again some disgrunteled newsgroup writers. I think the respondent has a valid point though. People on welfare tend to think that they have to be one welfare and that it is something that the state owes them. I don't mean to offend anyone, however, I find that people with this state of mind really irritates me. No one owes anyone anything unless you borrowed something. There are jobs readily available all over the place. Sure a person on welfare would not live comfortably getting a minimum wage job, but what can they expect. . .to make $50,000 a year starting pay right off the bat? I don't think so. Everyone has to start off somewhere, and if they don't start and decide to ride it on the easy road all their lives, well they are just cheating the system and themselves from ever becoming anything important in life.
Living on welfare is okay for those that lost their jobs or homes and have to try to rebuild their lives and who actually make an honest attempt at rebuilding it. But those that don't do anything but sit at home and make more babies to get more money and who think that working at home as a baby factory worker need to get a wake up call. It isn't right and it should be stopped. The laws should give welfare recipients money for only several years and if they don't get jobs by the end of the year then it should just be their problem to find one and the government should stop giving them money. I feel really strongly about this issue and found this topic to be good.
Re: Road Rage (Was: OAPs and Driving)
Date 4 Feb 98 14:44:56 +0000
Motorways are the safest kind of roads (although
accidents in them are more severe because of the high speeds). Erm, no;
accidents on rural roads are more severe than those on Motorways, and as well
as being much more common. Hang on, what are we talking about here? Does
"severe" mean a 20-car pile-up or does it mean serious injury?
Are we comparing lots of little accidents with few large ones? I was meaning a
greater porportion of accidents resulting in serious injuries or deaths. We
are comparing a few small ones (6,400 with any injuries on motorways) with a
lot of large accidents (12,000 with serious injuries on rural roads). The
average 'cost' of an accident does not vary much amongst various road types -
[ Average costs (Thousand pounds): Urban Rural Mway All Fatal 935 1,025 991
984. Serious 111 131 139 118. Slight 11 13 15 11. All 33 69 50 42 ]
Accidents big or small nonetheless are important and serious. The numbers of accidents on the road are tremendous. This says something about the way people drive and about their attitudes towards driving. Are we safe drivers or are we just always in a rush to get from point A to point B any way we can? I know that when I am in a rush to get places I drive like a freak and I am a safety hazard on the roads. I can't be the only one like this and I'm sure I'm not either. I don't know what can be done to make people become safer drivers. Does someone close to us need to be killed or injured on the road for us to take a step back and think about our recklessness and how we are a detriment to others. This shouldn't be the way of the world, but sadly it is.
Okay, I thought this one was kind of dumb. Why are they talking about bullets and whether or not a bullet is harmful. Are these people crazy? Guns are never safe. A shooting bullet from a gun whether it hits you in your arms or legs or if it hits you in your vital areas are still deadly. To even have a conversation about the safety of guns has to be the craziest thing ever. But then again, we all don't think this way. In some places, people raise their children around guns and even teach them at very young ages to shoot one. How can people be so naive and unsafe about guns, especially around children.
Re: Observing Traffic Laws (was Experiencing
Road Rage)
Date Mon, 22 Dec 1997 09:16:56 -0500
So here was someone who was waiting at a stop
light waiting to turn right. [...] Without waiting to see whether
there were any pedestrians on the right, she made a right turn.
I _always_ just run behind the right-turning car, assuming that the driver
doesn't see me (even if I see the whites of their eyes). They are naturally
looking to the left to see if there's traffic coming, so they are not going to
see you. Yes, the law is probably in your favor, but I'd rather spend time
running than phoning a lawyer from a hospital bed! The one time I forgot and
ran in front of the car a few months back, I nearly got hit.
Don't blame it on "crazy drivers": the guy was
clearly sorry. To be realistic, drivers just aren't looking for you. They
_should_ but they don't so you have to run defensively. One problem I've
thought about with the strategy of running behind a right-turning car is that
it decreases your visibility for other cars, which might be turning/going
straight into your path from other directions. This is especially true when
you are running behind an SUV or large truck. In that case, I try to look at
all the traffic which could even think about running me over. Any thoughts on
this? Maybe wear a ten-foot high hat?
Being a driver, I admit that looking for pedestrians is a mindless act. I am not fully aware of pedestrians when I am driving. It is only when I almost hit one do I realize that they are very much there. I know that this isn't safe for myself or pedestrians, but I don't know what to do about it. It's something that I must work on because if I ever hit a pedestrian, well, I could go to jail if the person dies. That wouldn't be good. I could also get sued and be working for the rest of my life to give my money to someone else for my carelessness. It's something to think about for all of us who drive carelessly and don't think much about pedestrians. This person has a good head on his shoulders and thinks a lot about his safety and the safety of others.
Re: Road Rage (Was: OAPs and Driving)
Date Wed, 04 Feb 1998 06:39:22 +0000
As to them being inherantly dangerous, life is
inherantly dangerous Doug, if you wish to spend yours wrapped in cotton-wool
then that is up to you.
I am not talking about danger to oneself but to others. We nominally have a
right to life and liberty etc., but here we have the selfish owners of motor
vehicles depriving us of that right without proper justification. The
justification is we need to travel to work and we need to work to live.
You don't need to work to live in a welfare state.
Public Transport will never supply all the transport needs of our country Not
all perhaps, but most.
so the car will be with us for some time yet. Unfortunately but is this any
reason to defend it? Its motive power may change but there are no viable
alternatives for all the jobs a car can do. And there are no viable
alternatives to those who have been killed, injured and poisoned so that
others may prosper and enjoy their 'personal freedoms'.
[ D., London, England, UK, EU? UK Radical Campaigns Jump Page -
Public Transportation isn't always the best. I don't think that it poses any solutions to the way we drive or the amount of cars on the road. It is just a thing that everyone feels the need to have a car of their own whether or not it is a necessity. Even people who aren't living comfortable own cars. They work to pay for their cars, and having public transportation is just there for emergencies. I myself live close to the University and right along the Bus Route. However, I refuse to ride the Bus if I don't have to. If I can drive I do. If I am late for school and don't have time to look for parking, well that's when the Bus comes in handy. People think that having Mass Transit and more public means of transportation will help our society, but I have to disagree with them.
Re: Road Rage (Was: OAPs and Driving)
Date Wed, 04 Feb 1998 06:39:24 +0000
As I said elsewhere, the careless opening of
heavy car doors is a far greater hazard than the odd shopping bag. It is not
without significance here that we have a cyclist at odds with a pedestrian
instead of with the much greater menace of car drivers. We have been
conditioned to think that car drivers have a god given right to be on the
roads but that pedestrians are second class citizens who are just a bloody
nuisance to everyone else
I have never considered car drivers to have a god given right and I don't
consider my self second class when I am a pedestrian. There are dangers
everywhere, you stand a good chance of getting mugged on a train, run over by
a bus or taxi or tripping over a broken pavement every time you travel.
It is one thing to die from a natural accident and quite another to die from
the deliberate, knowing actions of others.
Being a biker and a car driver I consider myself to be better trained, I had
to pass three tests after all.
So do some road ragers and drunk drivers. Does that make them any better?
[ D., London, England, UK, EU? UK Radical Campaigns Jump Page -
How true, how true. Anyone can get injured at anytime. Accidents don't discriminate. It doesn't matter if you are the smartest person in this world or the most talented driver, you are not exempt from being hit by a car or any other type of accident. You have the same chance as any other person at being involved in an accident. Innocent people get killed everyday by other people on the roads. It is usually those that are at fault who don't die. This boggles my mind. I can't for the life of me understand this. There are so many incidences where innocent people who are driving safely become victims of drunk drivers or reckless drivers. It isn't fair, but then again, life is never fair. It also makes me think that if I am a reckless driver, would that make it harder for me to get killed. I doubt it, but it does cross my mind.
By the looks of the Newsgroup reports of my classmates, I have to say that we all did an excellent job. Everyone really had good comments about the Newsgroups that they decided to write about. Again, it was neat to see how the same project can turn out so differently with the imaginations of everyone. Everyone seemed to have their own style and everyone had their own opinions and stances on certain issues. I feel that for myself, I did my best on this report and I know this because I learned a lot from doing this report. It made me think about the issues of everyday life, and it was good to read about the different thoughts of my fellow classmates.
Again, remember the concept of procrastination and how it is really bad. Putting a web page report together is somewhat different than just writing a 4-5 page report. So put some thought and time into doing your reports and make it the best that you can. This newsgroups report was good because you learn how to search the web using USENET which is something different than a regular seach of web pages. Also this report will help you to see different perspectives of others in this world, and it will make you think a lot about yourself and your ways of life. Utilize all resources and learn as much as you can about the world wide web while you can. It is something that could only benefit you in your life, and by taking this course, you already took the first step into learning about the wave of the future.
Back to the Table of Contents
Go back to my homepage