|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Politics? |
Rivals |
The Future |
Support |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Subject: CLINTON!!!!! Our fore fathers pledged thier lives,fortunes and sacred honor so we might be free,Clinton and the Democrats have none of the above.
Subject: Re: CLINTON!!!!! On the contrary, Clinton by following the polls and the whims of the public is in the American libertarian spirit that stretches from the radical reformation through the antinomian controversy of 1636 through the Emersonian romanticism of the 19th century through the sixties to today.
Subject: Re: CLINTON!!!!! Why did you place your right-wing propaganda in a newsgroup that deals with investments? Get your topics straight, please! ... Our fore fathers pledged thier lives,fortunes and sacred honor so we might be free,Clinton and the Democrats have none of the above. |
Comment:
In this particular exchange, a comment negatively commenting on President
Clinton and Democrats in general. In response several people decided to write
replies to his post. Here I have included two of the many posts that were put
up.
First off, it is important to note that post is out of line and constitutes
unappropriate verbal garbage. I say this not because I necessarily support
Clinton and the Democrats, but rather because this Newsgroup is a stock and
investing newsgroup and his message has nothing to do with that topic. Why
engage in this kind of spamming behavior one can only speculate. Perhaps he
just wanted to stimulate a heated intellectual discussion on a somewhat
controversial topic, or maybe he has some deep seated hatred towards democrats
and the President. It may also be the case that his sole intent was to create
trouble and mischief. On a side note, it is interesting to analyze the type of
spam message this particular posts represents. It is not spam in the sense
that he is saying something unintelligible like name calling or swearing, nor
is he merely trying to sell something. His comment is very legitimate and on a
political discussion newsgroup it would not be considered spam.
Looking at the replies there were basically two categories of responses. There
were those individuals who accepted the comment at face value and responded to
it appropriately, engaging in friendly debate or support. And there were other
individuals who were somewhat upset because the topic did not fit under the
topic of the Newsgroup. D. Williams replied with some history of politics in
an attempt to challenge. J. Cresseveur, on the other hand, rather
straightfowardly addresses the fact that this message does not belong here,
while at the same time throwing in her own little attack calling his views
right-wing propaganda.
I think that the original poster's intent was to stir up trouble and get some
action and response out of people either in terms of heated debate or anger
towards his inappropriate post. Perhaps he is a mischievous person in nature
or there may be some deep seeded need to call attention to himself. He may be
insecure in the real world and by posting such messages blatantly in the wrong
area gains instant attention. We also learn a little about the responders'
personalities through their posts. It seems that Mr. Williams was trying to
appear intellectual and superior -- to show off. I get the feeling that he
merely through in a lot of big words that are not really necessary to make his
point. As for Mrs. Cresseveur it is interesting that that her own political
agenda is exposed as she mentions right-wing propaganda. Perhaps there are
some deep seeded unaddressed issues going on with her.
|
Subject: BLASH IS GONE !!! IT's SO NICE BLASH is gone, is'nt it nice ? The NG has not had a nasty flame war since 11/8/98. That's a month of peace !!! BLASH got shut off by AOL because he got caught putting up a fake post. This is the secound time this has happened to him. " Hitler " shot himself and the NAZI movement in this NG vanished. I played the role of Stalin here. [Robert G Smith ] |
Comment:
In this post M80s is commenting on the disappearance of another Newsgroup
participant, Blash, who used to frequent this stock and investing newsgroup.
M80s is both celebrating this situation as well as bragging about having
played a role in this event. It is important to note the relationship between
these two posters. Apparently from what I can tell, M80s and Blash don't
really get along very well. They have been attacking each other on this
newsgroup for quite a while. And as we will see later, when Blash comes back,
the bickering starts up all over again.
Reading M80s' posts it appears that he number one, is very pleased that his
rival will no longer be present. Number two it seems that he is trying to gain
the support of the rest of the Newsgroup so that they will all be on his side.
Number three, he obviously is bragging about his role and cunningness in the
demise of Blash. And last of all he thinks that he is the superior victor. His
victory, however, was not so much about saving and proteting the Newsgroup
from rogue posters, but more of carrying out a personal feud with Blash.
Remember M80s too contributed to the disruption of the Newsgroup. This is a
common tendency, where people tend to only see events and situations from one
perspective, their own. Everything that they do they see as right and good and
everything else that someone else does who does not agree with them is bad.
M80s also seems to be living in a sort of fantasy world talking about Nazis,
Hitler, and Stalin.
|
Subject: Telephone vs. Cable vs.
Wireless/Satellite? For the futurists in the group--some questions. What will the Internet look like in 5 years? 10 years? Will telecommunications as we know it be any different than it is today? Will the Operating System and Hard Drive become passe? Will everyone consolidate---phone companies buying utility companies buying cable companies buying ISP's etc? Some food for thought.
Subject: Re: Telephone vs. Cable vs.
Wireless/Satellite? For the futurists in the group--some questions. Will telecommunications as we know it be any different than it is today? Heard on the street: I have no proof of this, but maybe something to spur those interested into researching it further. Someone I was talking to about a year ago had the opinion that in the future there would be no need for telepnone lines because each home, for example, would have a satellite dish that would telecommunicate with microwave signals. Now this is where I need to do my research because this raises questions, such as: I never studied networking, so I don't know how a computer cannot start without it's own operating system or hard drive. I know that anyone can get a direct connection to the Internet backbone, but it is cheaper for me to go through an Internet Service Provider; which goes through a gateway to the backbone.
|
Comment:
The purpose of Smiledoc's posting seems primarily to stimulate a in depth
discussion. As oppossed to other discussions, his post does not attack anyone,
nor does it seem to seek negative attention or trouble. He seems to be
genuinely interested in a sort of intellectual exchange on this topic,
although his motivations are left to interpret. I would venture to guess that
his reason for posing such a question is not purely out of a quest for
knowledge. It is probably safe to say that he is hoping to gain from any
answer some information or tips that will help him to gain bigger rewards in
his investments. This is after all a stock and investment newsgroup. I suspect
he is hoping for some valuable information hopefully from someone who appears
to know what they are talking about -- perhaps someone in the field. I wonder,
however, just how serious Smiledoc is in believing that he will get relevant
information. Is he doing this more out of fun just to see what's out there, or
does he really believe he will get the next inside scoop. One would have to
question the credibility of anyone who replies first of all because any
insight into the future is purely speculation, and second because if someone
really knew why would they let everyone else in on the secret.
Nldgr's response to Smiledoc's question is pretty interesting. His approach is
different from what would normally be expected. Instead of outright boasting
that he knows the answer or pretending to be an expert he presents
possibilities and situations that present even more questions than answers. He
seems to be very cautious in his approach, maybe because he doesn't want to
offend anyone. His not wanting to offend anyone seems to be supported by the
fact that midway through his message he realizes that he isn't really talking
stocks and kind of apologizes and tries to relate what he has said to the
topic of the Newsgroup. Nldgr's response is carefully constructed and draws
the reader in and makes the reader more likely to follow up.
Whether Nldgr is really soft spoken and doesn't like to offend people, or if
he really just knows how to manipulate and control other people is anyone's
guess. His message is effective, however, because of the fact that he doesn't
offend anyone and gently eases his point of view into the post as a
suggestion. He is knowledgeable but at the same time makes himself not
knowledgeable maybe in an attempt to make other people feel like they have to
rescue him. This is common in real life where people might pretend to need
help as a form of manipulation. Sometimes people also pretend to know less
than they really know.
|
Subject: Re: Help - I am new in this game
I'm not sure what your goals are, so it's tough to give you an answer. I tried daytrading and, while I was moderately successful to begin with, I eventually took a bath. I now stick to what I am good at - finding value stocks. My current faves are ORCL and HDIE. I am sure there are others that are good, but these are my 2 most heavily researched. I like MFNX, but I'm holding out on that one. I avoided DELL for the very reason you bought it - it seemed TOO good. No company can show 50% growth all the time. They were due. That said, I think there are lots of values out there, and you need to look at alot of factors: How long do you intend to hold? What trends do you think will manifest themselves in that time? Are the companies you looking at GOOD (look at cash flow - is it positive, is the PE reasonable (10-40), etc.)? Don't assume that a low priced stock can go
up more than a high priced one. If you can buy 10,000 shares of a stock at
1, or 1,000 of another at 10...make sure the $1 stock is showing signs of
life. There are reasons stocks are valued at a low level. I don't think
you screwed up, I think you saw alot of people making money, and you
wanted in on it. Don't worry...the worm will turn. This is a temporary
lull. If I were you, I'd sideline it for a while, study the market a
little, and wait for a clear bullish signal (or a bearish one...you can
make money that way, too). |
Comment:
The purpose of Mr. Monihan's post was to reply to the question. Apparently is
a newbie stock investor and is experiencing some difficulties with the wide
fluctuation in the market. It seems as if he has just invested some money in
two companies and both of them have lost money. He is trying to make sense out
of the mass of confusion to see if there is something that he is just not
getting. In other words, the question is reaching out for some sort of help
and support. Mr. Monihan was one of the people who responded to its questionâs
plea for assistance.
It is obvious that Mr. Monihan's purpose in writing the reply was to sincerely
help this person to feel better about the whole situation. Mr. Monihan did not
have to respond so kindly to a newbie (as some people go out of their way to
destroy newbies). Instead he offered encouragement, and support through the
use of his own personal experiences. This is a method that allows him to
better connect to it. The person who raised the question will see that they
have a shared interest and past. He will see that Mr. Monihan has gone through
the same pains so that he knows what he is talking about. Instead of lecturing
Mr. Monihan replies in a calm, explanatory voice. He attempts to teach him how
he can better judge what stocks to buy and how to buy them in the future so
that he doesn't make the same mistakes again. Another effective psychological
tactic that Mr. Monihan uses is that he tries to understand the motive and
goals behind his so that he can better help him. If he understands the goal
then he can gear his reply more towards an effective answer.
Mr. Monihan is like a good friend telling the person don't worry your not
alone this happens to everyone, you'll do better next time. His message keeps
him from becoming discouraged and dropping out. Perhaps Mr. Monihan was raised
in a family where helping others was a virtue that was emphasized. A better
explanation, however, might be that Mr. Monihan saw a little of himself in
that post and wanted that person to succeed just like him. He probably had
thought to himself, if only when I was just beginning someone had been there
to help me. We tend to help and favor other people who are more like
ourselves.
|
Subject: Re: CPU-YHOO-AMZN-DELL-AOL Dude, why have you been pushing CPU so hard for the past three days? Let me guess, you were in at 14, right? [Dan ] COMP USA (CPU) for around 11 a share. Will go up to 13 within 2 weeks. Chart it for yourself. Continued growth and profits they are their only walk in competition in the business arena. In the Computer to first user they are second to BEST BUY. since consumers find CompUSA to be intimidating. Theywill post excellent profits this year through web sales and through store sales. They will also be increasing staff to help remedy the extremly slow cashier lines when exiting the store. Which was the biggest complaint about the store and it was also for Caldor's. And look at Caldor now. CompUSA will reach 25 to 30 a share by years. Rumors about them are that they will recieve a contract from Sprint to promote them as their selected internet provider of choice in the near future. Unsure if Sprint is to purchase their current IPO in order to do this and make it legal. It would be nicer if AOL or MSN decided to do it instead. |
Comment:
The situation surrounding this exchange is as follows. Volvo744TI was
responding to a post that was posted by someone else. The person who posted
the message proclaimed how the stock of CompUSA was going to go higher and
higher because of all of these specific factors which he listed. Volvo744TI
responded in his posts rather skeptical and with a hint of hostility or
annoyance. This was not the first post by this person who was claiming all of
this good fortune for CompUSA. Apparently Volvo744TI started to question the
validity of the information and the neutrality of this person in regard to
this stock since this person seemed to repeatedly hype this stock. Volvo744TI
respondes rather sarcastically saying "dude...you were in at 14 right?" in an
effort to expose the poster's real intentions.
Volvo744TI's reaction was not uncommon. In real life many people act similarly
when someone overly brags or hypes something up, bigger than it really is, or
if they make big claims about something that is obviously not the truth. When
people get annoyed enough they react in a way that will hopefully shut the
loud mouth annoying person up. The person who posted the message, on the other
hand, was probably hoping to influence the actions and thoughts of other
people by shamelessly promoting CompUSA on ungrounded speculation. If other
people saw that someone else supported CompUSA stock then they might be more
likely to also purchase the stock which would in turn raise the price and make
the original person who posted the message better off. If that was to occur it
would simply be the case that people are more likely to perform an action if
they see other people also doing it. Another explanation might simply be that
the person was trying to repress his negative feelings because he had lost
money on a poor investment.
|
Subject: Re: BLASHLAND ? I'm a patient person, but ... Don't you think it is time you two stopped clogging up this newsgroup with your petty dispute, whatever it is? Really, it is just as bad as spam. If you need to duke it out (or whatever you call this relationship) why not do it in private by email? That way you won't embarrass yourselves. [Gib ]
Subject: BLASHLAND ? Welcome to BLASHLAND where lak of knowledge is filled in with making fun of people. Where being a coward about taking risk because of a severe lak of knowledge about securities passes for sophisitation promoted by the BIG LIE method of brainwashing. It's no concidence that Hitler BLASH uses the real Hitlers BIG LIE method of self promotion because what the real Hitler and BLASH have in common the most is that they both have hate as their prime motivation. In BLASH'S case though the HATE part of him comes from Hate of oneself. This is why BLASH abuses people. BLASH has fun at others expense and gets pissed off when people have fun at his expense. Put another way BLASH can dish it out but can't take it. About the only thing that BLASH has enough knowledge about to make recomendations for is Gay sex toys performance. BLASHLAND ? = BLASH HELL. [Robert G Smith ] |
Comment:
In this post Gib Bogle is commenting on a series of exchanges between M80s and
Bash (remember them from the other posts?). She has apparently become fed up
with their behavior especially because their posts have nothing to do with the
Newsgroup topic of stocks and investing. This is precisely what gives her the
power and justification to try to control her fellow newsgroup participants.
If they had been having a heated debate over some stock or investment strategy
then she would probably no longer have the ability to tell them to stop and
leave. But because M80s and Bash have in essence violated the rules of the
community Gib Bogle has a right to criticize and is also more likely to have
the support and backing by other members of the newsgroup.
It is interesting to note that all along for some reason I had pictured Gib
Bogle as a female. But only later did I realize that I actually had nothing to
base that assumption on. No where in the post does it make reference to male
or female and the alias name means that the poster could be male or female. I
think the reason I thought it was a she was because of the way they responded.
Although this person was obiously upset and angered by the multiple spamming
by these two people he/she replied in a way that was more friendly and less
likely to offend the other people. Instead of coming straight out and telling
them to shut up and leave, the person politely (which I might have also
interpreted as timidness) commented "I'm a patient person, but... don't you
two think its time to...". I think another reason was that it kind of sounded
like a mother trying to break up a fight between two brothers.
I agree with what Gib Bogle did and I think that many other people would agree
too. In any community when people are being disruptive and ignoring rules then
someone has to step in and regulate otherwise chaos will result.
|
Subject: Double Your Money In ONE MONTH!!!
Think it's impossible? and request the info! I'd love to hear
people's opinions on the subject. -Tony |
Comment:
I chose this particular newsgroup post to illustrate a specific point. This
post is an another example of spamming. It's not spam in the sense that the
person is attacking other people or making trouble, and it's also not spamming
in the sense that the information doesn't match the topic of the newsgroup
because it does. In this case it is spam because in a sense that is
advertising or trying to sell something, kind of like an infomercial, and like
an infomercial this post is annoying. The interesting thing is that unlike
other situations where people respond to the annoying poster by telling them
to shut up or to leave the newsgroup, in this newsgroup people pretty much
ignore these types of posts. In this stocks and investment newsgroup about 1/4
to 1/2 of the posts are this type of spam and one has to be able to
differentiate between legitimate, useful information and useless ones like
these. As you can see no one has responded to his post.
Why did bufort@injersey.com post such a message? I assume perhaps he was
trying to trick gullible or desperate people probably to make money -- just
like the informercials. I think maybe he gets paid according to how many
people visit the site. It is interesting to me to read a message like this and
to think of who would respond to such a claim. I don't doubt, however, that a
lot of people might have checked the site out. There are many people in our
society today who are suckered into get rich quick schemes either because
they're lazy, broke, desperate, etc. People want to be rich, but don't want to
work hard for to achieve their goal. I think they justify to themselves that
these scams are not a hoax and that somehow they will become rich because
they're too afraid to face reality. Remember if something is too good to be
true then it probably is.
|
Subject: Re: Thought people would benefit
Not looking to spam, but I think that some people in here may benefit. not looking to spam, huh? well, shay, i thought your name sounded familiar, so i got sifted through the old agent outbox and found this: I am unceasingly amazed by the general lack of intelligence shown in this newsgroup, I am amazed, although only ceasingly, that spammers are so unintelligent that they think they are fooling someone by posting one of these fake testimonials. yet I think I have found something that can help. Labotomy? For the past seven months I have subscribed to a newsletter from ZXXX InveXXXXXXX that has given me exceptional returns for a very low price. Phew!! $79 x 7 months . . . $553 . . . no thanks. . .hope you subtracted that for your basis . . . He does not advertise, but I thought that you all would like to see what real performance is. Hmmm . . .when did "they" (Zxxx-Invexxxxxxx) become "he"? Sounds like you know "him" personally . . . He offers a free two week trial, and will never spam you. Like you have just done? His website is www.XXXX-XXXXXXXX.com. I hope that you achieve the success in the markets, with the ease that I have, as well.
|
Comment:
Here is still yet another post in response to unsolicited spam. As was the
case with the responses to other spam messages, Ryan is obviously extremely
annoyed and has chosen to make a big statement about it. Here is the
situation. Someone named Zeus posted a message that was in essence advertising
some sort of money making news letter (not the same as the previous post).
Ryan has taken personal offense to this blatent promotion mainly because it
seems he has had a bad experience with this person in the past -- or at least
he thinks so. Ryan believes that Zeus is really someone named Shay Horowitz. I
really liked Ryan's attempt to expose Zeus. I think his techniqe showed
creativity. I especially enjoyed the way he took little snipets of what Zeus
had said and then made little comments specific to each individual part in an
attempt to dismantle his post. It was hilarious when in response to Zeus'
statement "He offers a free two week trial, and will never spam you", Ryan
replies, "Like you have just done?".
Two things seem to be going on in this situation. The first is that Ryan is
trying to act as the regulator, regulating the Newsgroup to make sure that
spammers don't disrupt the social fabric of this particular newsgroup. He
appears to be a regular contributor to the Newsgroup and his comments are
intelligent and insightful. He knows what he's talking about. In this sense
this newsgroup mirros real life where in a community it is the elders (people
who have been a part of the group for a long time) who keep order and are
respected. If someone is out of line then they attempt to put them back into
place. The other issue that is a factor in Ryan's response is that his reason
for responding in such a manner is not purely for the good of the community.
Ryan also has a personal vendeta against Zeus. He is driven not just by
altruism or a sense of collectiveness, but also by anger and revenge. And not
only that, but it seems that Ryan has a general dislike of all spammers and
doesn't just sit quietly and put up with it. It says a lot about the kind of
person he is that he speaks his mind with authority, and dismantles Zeus'
statement in a logical, systematic way instead of just attacking him back.
|
Subject: Crystal ball for sale.... Place your orders for GBFE tomorrow morning. At aroung 12:00 there will be an announce emnt of a Disney buyout and then the stock will hit 4-5 dollars. To buy it at 2 dollars is a bargain, soon it will reach the 52 week high. Uncle Arnie" Computers will never replace human stupidity"
Subject: Re: Crystal ball for sale.... To buy it at 2 is bullshit. The stock is only worth 50 cents a share at most. You must want to sell your stock. |
Comment:
Here once again is the infamous Blash404. In this situation it seems that
Blash is actually making a useful and relevant comment. After all the topic
relates to the topic of the Newsgroup, and he's not bashing or attacking
anyone. However, upon closer inspection, his comment still falls under the
category of posts that in a way can be considered spam, or at the very least
it is the type of message that most people don't appreciate. All Blash404 is
doing is shamelessly promoting and hyping up a stock probably not bashed on
any kind of real information. Most times other Newsgroup members ignore such a
post but I guess Blash404's reputation as a troublemaker has preceded him and
now anything that he says is not taken at face value. It is the truth that
often times once someone has had a particular personality trait associated
with them or their behavior, other people continue to only view them through
that one light. Nemesis apparently has some kind of issue with Blash404. He
says rather bluntly, "To buy it at 2 is bullshit". I guess Nemesis did feel
the need for whatever reason to come up with a long witty comment.
Now why did Blash404 depart from his usual nonsense and make such a comment? I
think one possiblity based upon the type of person I have come to view him as,
is that he is only out to further is own good. If at the moment he needs to
quarrel with M80 then so be it. If he wants to get people to buy the same
stock has him so that he can make money and feel like an authority then he
will do that to -- anything that pleases him. Blash404's behavior can be
classified as deviant or antisocial behavior and as such needs to be dealt
with and properly treated or he will contiune to bug this community.
|
Subject: NASDAQ What does NASDAQ stand for?
Subject: NASDAQ Could someone tell us what NASDAQ stands
for?????PLease????? Thanks!! --
Subject: Re: NASDAQ national association of securities dealers automated quotation
Subject: Re: NASDAQ National Association of Securities Dealers and Automated Quotations I've looked everywhere, and I'm doing this from memory, because I can't find it online anywhere. But, it should be something like this...one word MIGHT be wrong.
Subject: Re: NASDAQ Never Assume Stocks Dilligently Apprectiate Quadrupally
Subject: Re: NASDAQ Never Assume Stocks Dilligently Apprectiate Quadrupally Newbies Ask Silly Dumb Ass Questions (-; -- E-Mail: SkyWalker1689 at Hotmail period Company
Subject: Re: NASDAQ Newbies Ask Silly Dumb Ass Questions (-; Never Actually Search During A Quest.
Subject: Re: NASDAQ NASDAQ: National Association of Sex Dealers And Quacks |
Comment:
This exchange between participants of the stocks and investing newsgroup is
the most amusing one that I have come across yet. Check it out. Here is a
brief summary of what unfolded. Basically it started off with a fifth grade
class posting a message asking what NASDAQ stands for. Now the NASDAQ is just
another stock exchange just like the New York Stock Exchange or the American
Stock Exchange. Assuming that this a real fifth grade class that is writing
the message (there may be some doubt since the e-mail address is --
questionable), the responses to the question are hilarious albeit a bit mean.
The first two responders Tbloom27 and Mr. Monihan (a previous poster) replied similarly giving the answer as National Association of Securities Dealers and Automated Quotations. This answer is of course the real answer. The next person to respond, Lovenox, gave the answer Never Assume Stocks Dilligently Apprectiate Quadrupally. Now this too is not the right answer, but nevertheless one can see how it is at least related to investing and could be a lesson in itself on realizing the risk involved in investing in the stock market. Lovenox, however, with his cute reply seems to have set off a whole chain of silly responses. In other words it is as if his response magically made it okay to respond with dumb acronyms for NASDAQ. Some were very out of line especially since children may have actually written this question. Imagine logging on to check this newsgroup for their answer and then they see Newbies Ask Silly Dumb Ass Questions, a response given by Sky Walker.
It seems that Tbloom27 and Mr. Monihan just wanted to help what they thought
of as a class of fifth graders engaging in research. Lovenox too I think had
good intentions. Seeing that two people had already given the correct answer
he probably just wanted to help them learn something else in a silly manner.
Sky Walker's post is just simply unappropriate behavior towards children, much
less any newbie with a real question. Maybe he too was attempting to be funny
trying to imitate Lovenox, but it didn't work. Or maybe he is just a mean
person who doesn't remember that he too was once a newbie.
Class Info:
After browsing my fellow classmates' newsgroup reports I have several comments
to make. First off it seemed like hardly anyone made the effort to take a risk
and make their web page different from the first one. I think it would have
been more interesting to have seen different things. Instead many it looked as
if people used the exact same format as the first report just with new text.
Other than the visual asthetics of the pages I must congratulate my classmates
on a job well done as far as the content. I think we all did a good job of
researching a wide variety of newsgroups and making interesting and
intellectual comments. I think that as people become more comfortable with
HTML they will feel more comfortable extending their skills.
Conclusion:
How can future generations use my document for studying newsgroups? I think
first of all students can see a sampling of what a newsgroup actually is and
what happens at a newsgroup. They will be able to experience the interaction
that occurs between the participants. Secondly, students will have a running
explanation along with the samples so they can better understand various terms
as well as the motivation of the posters. I think one way future generations
can improve upon my generation's report is to go back and look at all the
previous generations' newsgroups reports and observe whether or not the norms
of the newsgroup communities seem to have changed or remained relatively the
same. By norms I mean the type posts, topics, behaviors, etc. that are deemed
as acceptable and unacceptable.
My Home Page |
My Generations File |
My Newsgroups File |My
Oral Presentation File |My
Report 1: (title)
My Report 2: (title) |Icons
Folder |My
Class Home Page |Dr.
Leon James Home Page |