Krupat Readings


Affective Cognitive Sensorimotor
Spiritual Self I felt embarrassed about preliminary assumptions. I value my ability to be fair and open-minded.
I love reading psychology books and respect the author's opinions, theories, etc.
My perception of the idea that the author presented was distorted.
Theories presented in the book more often than not are good explanations of behavior.
I assumed that the author did not understand the point that she brushed off as "simple-minded."
I assumed the validity of this generalized theory.
Reflective Self I like being ontop of things and being in control of myself.
I am partial to the architectural circle, and haphazardly defend what pertains to it.
I am trying to find ways that the text theories fit into my behavior.
I was relieved when I came upon a main or familiar street because I didn't feel so disoriented.
One can shut the rest of the world out when retreating to his house if he regards it as a sanctuary (physical privacy----->psychological privacy).
I am overloading my mind with activities, obligations that my adaptation to this is to forget little things quickly.
Trying to associate this passage with my experience (trying to find a short street in "one-way" Waikiki).
The author is too one-sided and does not give full credit to what she calls "simple-minded."
This passage is important because it relates to a problem I have.
Automatic Self Drive to associate my experience with other's.
Trying to be more analytical and critical about what I read.
Satisfaction in knowing that I could have found an explanation to my problem of forgetfulness.
The author's suggestion of "disorientation", "terror", and "anxiety"
The author talks about windows and site lines being simple-minded privacy mechanisms.
Reading on the concept of overload leading to adaptation.
"I know what this feels like"
"I do not completely agree with the viewpoint of the author in this section".
"I cannot remember things as easily"

back to my homepage Dr. James' Homepage My other page Comments