Have the pages of the Generational Curriculum
improved in relation to the quality, depth, richness,
technique, scholarship, connectivity, site integration,and
navigation
capabilities ? In order to answer these questions
the criterions of quality, depth, richness, and
scholarship were group together to form category 1.
In addition, the criterions of technique, connectivity,
integration, and navigation capabilities were grouped
together to form category 2. Within categories 1 & 2,
a generalized description of the criterions was then devised :
A rating scale ranging from a possible score of 1 thru 5 was then formed for the two respective categories (1=poor and 5=excellent). The scales are illustrated below:
Gen. 1 |
Gen. 2 |
Gen. 3 |
Gen. 3a |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. length of Papers |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
2. Sub headings |
3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
3. References with comments |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
4. Detail of topics |
4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| 5. Development of topics | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
6. Integration into psychology and science |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Totals : |
23 | 24 | 26 | 24 |
Overall Mean Scores : |
3.83 | 4 | 4.33 | 4 |
Gen. 1 |
Gen. 2 |
Gen. 3 |
Gen. 3a |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Links |
3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
2. Navigation Buttons |
3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
3. Overall Appearance |
2 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
4. Special Effects |
2 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 5. Presence of Index or table of contents | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Totals : |
15 | 18 | 22 | 21 |
Overall Mean Scores : |
3 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Gen. 1 |
Gen. 2 |
Gen. 3 |
Gen. 3a |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Mean Scores : |
3.415 |
3.8 |
4.36 |
4.1 |
There was a noticeable improvement from generation 1 thru generation 3a. Generation 1 recorded an overall mean score of 3.415, Generation 2 received a score of 3.8, Generation 3 received a score of 4.36, and finally Generation 3a received a score of 4.1. Other than a drop of score in Generation 3a, a significant amount of improvement was evident.
Generation 1 received the lowest overall mean score (3.415). This low score does not fully indicate the overall value that this generation represents. Since Generation 1 set forth the foundation for other generations, it would be erroneous on my part to only report its low score without giving credit to its scholarly contributions to the Generational Curriculum. Generation 1's reports were informative as well as descriptive (they received a score of 4). To illustrate this point, read a few reports written by Jill Kaneshiro. Generation 1 also scored high in the area of links. Kevin Bogan's page contained many outside links that were relevant to his page. In category 2, Generation 1 received rather low scores in the areas of special effects and overall appearance. Possibly, these low scores reflect the lack of Internet technologies available at that time.
Generation 2 made considerable improvements
over generation 1. In category 1, there was a
noticeable improvement in the area of development
of topic.
Lori Morita's reports were a prime example of this.
In category 2, Generation 2 made significant
improvements from Generation 1 in the areas of
overall appearance, special effects, and navigation
buttons. The use of home page backgrounds as well
as images were great tools utilized by students of
this generation. Once again Lori Morita's
page demonstrates this point. Furthermore, the
topical indexes of this generation impressed me.
Generation 3 proved to be the generation that had
made the most improvement. In every area of Category
1, this generation either equaled or exceeded generation 2.
In the area of development of topic generation 3 did
extremely well (they scored a 5 !). A report by our own
Sherman Lee is a prime example of this marked
improvement. Once again, in every area of Category
2, Generation 3, equaled or exceeded Generation 2.
In addition, there was a significant improvement
in the area of overall appearance. Generation 3
utilized images as well as color backgrounds to
make their home pages aesthetically pleasing.
An example of this can be found at
Heather Roylo's page. Finally, I was impressed
by the topical indexes generated by this generation
(see Garrett
Chun's topical index).
Generation 3a's scores fell in both categories.
In the areas of detail of topics and development of
topics generation 3a (score of 4) came one point
short of Generation 3. Furthermore, the overall
appearance of their pages seemed rather generic;
there was even one page that didn't contain a single
report. However, the topical indexes of Generation
3a were well constructed (see Rhanele Ring's
index). It is the opinion of this writer that
since Generation 3 was a summer course, the
students didn't have the luxury of time on
their side. Through my own personal experience
in this course, I have come realize that time
is an important
asset. It takes time to learn the intricacies of
HTML language as well as proper Web page design.
The progress of Generations 1 thru 3a is moving
along nicely. There were notable marks of improvement
in the overall appearance and special effects utilized
from one generation to another. In addition, there
was a steady improvement in the areas of
development and detail of topic(s). Once more it
must be emphasized that the low scores of
generations 1 & 2 are not indicative of their
scholarly worth. Generations 1 & 2 endured the
trials and tribulations of being the first two
Cyber-Psychology classes ever to explore and
become a part of the Generational Curriculum;
this is where their true worth lies. In the case of
Generation 3a, they simply didn't have enough
time (6 weeks). It was remarkable that they
were able to nearly sustain the same
level of excellence that Generation 3 had accomplished
in a semester.
Searching for
Oral and Written Communicative Competence
was an article authored by Dr. Leon James. Upon
completion of this article, I was able to appreciate
and understand the rationale behind the creation
of the Generational
Curriculum area. Dr. James believed that college students needed
"oral and written communicative competence".
In order to foster this type of "communicative
competence", Dr. James determined that
"authenticity" had to be present first. In
1960 Dr. James got to put his theory in action,
he developed a teaching program for the Dade
County, Florida school district. This program
would allowed teachers to provide an "authentic
learning environment" for classes that contained
Spanish and English speaking students. With an
"authentic learning environment" established, the
process of acquiring communicative competence
could take place. Dr. James gave credit to
psychologist Kurt Lewin, who's theory on "group
dynamic forces" allowed him to discover that
social forces can be manipulated (creating an
authentic learning atmosphere), thus promoting
the acquisition of "communicative competence".
With that theory in mind, in 1975 with
the help of Dr. Diane Nahl, Dr. James set up
the Generational Curriculum at the University
of Hawaii . The Generational Curriculum is a
site that consists of an array of writings
authored by students in Dr. James's psychology
classes dating back from 1975. The teaching
approach used in the Generational Curriculum
was to foster the acquisition of "oral and written
communicative competence".
Currently the Generational
Curriculum possess works of Dr. James'
Traffic
and Cyber-Psychology classes. In addition,
The Daily
Round Archives consists of students' reports
dating from as far back as 1975.
Linda Wong of
generation 1 expressed nothing but positive
comments for the Generational Curriculum.
She also made a very good point, "In conclusion,
what I would say is that the whole experience
is beneficial and yes,
it is fun, but you have to pay your dues for it."
The Generational Curriculum experience
proved to be a positive
experience. Students were able to gain
confidence and learn valuable
computer skills. One good point brought
up was the fact that students have to pay
their dues in order to survive. But in the end
they are rewarded with a sense of accomplishment.
As for myself, I have enjoyed
being part of the Generational Curriculum. I must
admit that the work was long and tedious, but
the end results were well worth the effort. I
leave this class with the ability to construct
a home page (HTML language and Web page
design skills) as well as a better
understanding of the Internet.
Linda Wong
of generation 1 had problems from the onset.
Linda says, "When I first began to create my
three files using emacs, I ran into several
problems. The biggest
and most frustrating one was when I would
try to save the file. From the information in my
notes, I would type C-x then C-c. After typing
C-x, the bottom of the screen would show
"C-x". Then when I would type C-c, it didn't
say anything about saving and would just kick me
out of the emacs." What did Linda do ? She
e-mailed Dr. James and Kevin. Fortunately,
Kevin was in the lab and was able to assist her.
This example clearly illustrates the value of
the Generational Curriculum. The
Generational Curriculum fosters an environment
that allows students to seek out each other or
their professor if they need help.
Yoon Whan Cho of Generation 2 experienced
being lost in Cyber-Space when she first began
using Netscape.
Yoon Whan says, "I felt lost in the Net. I felt
like I was loosing the interest for a
short time and got scared because I was
worried what if I develop a phobia." Yoon Whan
was able to realize that patience was the key
to any new learning experience. What a great
revelation (and I'm not being sarcastic) ! If
only I was able to realize this when I first began
navigating around the Net two years ago.
Robin Miller (Generation 3)
like Yoon Whan Choo was also able to develop
coping skills. Robin says, "...if you keep a positive mental
attitude and don't let it beat you, you will realize it is
not that difficult after all." Wise words to live by.
The most common problem I found was the
initial difficulty in learning Unix commands and
the use of Netscape by first time users. Like
with any new experience there has to be a
period of initial adjustment. (I guess that's
why UH provides a withdrawal period for students
who can't adjust). What makes these Cyber-Psychology
classes special, is the fact that we are a learning
community. Students are able to contact each other by
e-mail as well as having many opportunities to
work with fellow students in the computer labs.
Furthermore, students also have the convenience of
e-mail to keep in contact with Dr. James if they
have any questions and/or problems. Most of the
professors here (UH) provide students with only
office numbers. On the other hand, Dr. James
provides his students with his e-mail address,
office number, and home number. With these
types of resources, it is virtually impossible to fail
this class.
In order to accommodate the growth of
the Generational Curriculum a staff of
competent personnel must be assigned.
I propose a management team be assigned as
caretakers of this site. The management team
(this can be a 499 class) would consist of students
that have taken part in Dr. James's Traffic and/or
Cyber-Psychology classes before. Once the management team is formed
they would be assigned to committees. The
committees would be responsible for carrying
out specific task(s) that would ultimately result
in fulfilling the "mission statement". Committees would arrange weekly meetings on
their own. A weekly general meeting would be
conducted by the manager. At this meeting
progress reports as well as discussions
would be held.
Another weekly meeting would be conducted by
Dr. James, at this meeting progress reports would
be given by each committee. In addition, the
manager would have to meet with Dr. James
once a week to discuss the overall direction
that the team is headed in. I believe that this program will result
in the Generational Curriculum maintaining
its functionality. The only problem with
this program lies in the lack of continuity
due to the inflow of new management teams
every semester. Perhaps, the psychology
department could actually hire a student
management team to alleviate this potential problem.
Results from Generation 3 :
Results from Generation 3a :
Wrapping it up :
What is the Generational
Curriculum ?
What is it like being part
of the Generational Curriculum ?
Tina Smith
of generation 1 believed that being part of the
Generational Curriculum has equipped her with
valuable computer skills. Personally, I strongly
agree with her on this point.
Robin Miller
of Generation 3 stated, " As far as conflicts
go, I think the best thing to
do to overcome them is to try to keep a
positive mental
attitude. It is hard sometimes when your
computer
freezes or something is going wrong and
you can't
figure out what. But, if you keep a positive
mental
attitude and don't let it beat you, you will
realize it is
not that difficult after all." If I had a
penny for every time my
Mac froze up I would be.... well not rich, but
let's just say I would have a lot of pennies.
But seriously, these are wise words that everyone
should learn to
apply to in their own lives.
Problems ? Does anyone
have a problem ?
Developing a long
term program :
The duties of the team would be:
1) To work with Dr. James and produce a
"mission statement".
2) To work with Dr. James and develop a well
structured plan that would ensure the fulfillment
of the "missions statement".
Note: Every semester there will be a new
management team. The new team along with
Dr. James will determine if a new missions
statement is needed.
The management team would be structured as follows :
1) Dr. James would appoint a Manager.
The manager would have to possess excellent
leadership and communication skills. The manager
would also have to possess competent skills in
all areas of the Internet (HTML, Java, concepts, Unix,
page design, etc.).
2) Dr. James and the Manager would hand
pick a crop of assistant managers based
on their demonstrated abilities in previous
Traffic and/or Cyber-Psychology course(s).
In the future the organizational integrity
of this site may suffer due to the enormous
amount of pages and reports that will be added.
If this site becomes difficult to
traverse, it may lead to the degradation of
its "authenticity". In my opinion, the Generation
Curriculum is one of the most valuable sites on
the internet. I feel confident that the management
program I have proposed would be the best
possible solution to insure the Generational
Curriculum's survival and success.
Note: if you wish to see the potential
problems that the Generation Curriculum
may face in the future you can read my
report 4
.
Go
back to my homepage
Email me