Report Number

 

BOTTOM OF PAGE


G5 Manages a Quality Driving Circle Traffic Attitude Adjustment


INTRODUCTION: SMILE DRIVERS SMILE!
TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY THROUGH THE GENERATIONS: PAST PERSPECTIVES

SETTING UP AND RUNNING MY QUALITY DRIVING CIRCLE: JUST A BUNCH OF MONKEYS

DRIVING IMPROVEMENT RESOURCES ON THE WEB: LINKS TO BETTER DRIVING

Introduction: Smile Drivers SMILE!

This is a report on Quality Driving Circles (QDC). The purpose of this paper is to determine the effectiveness of QDC's. We will also review the opinions of past generations and compare them to those of today's drivers. It Is our goal to create happy drivers driving in a happy environment.

Traffic Psychology Through the Generations:
Past Perspectives

Generation One

Todd Takitani

Laura Izutsu

 

Generation Two

Alan Furukawa

Nancee Aki

 

Generation Three

Christy Forsythe

Angie Inoue

 

Setting Up and Running My Quality Driving Circle: Just a Bunch of Monkeys

For this section, I had to collect a group of people and have three sessions in an attempt to make them happy drivers. One was a 20 year old female who's lived in Hawaii all of her life, the second was a 20 year old male who moved to Hawaii just a year and a half ago, and finally a 21 year old male who had moved to Hawaii about 4 years ago. I chose to address the problem of a problematic driving environment and how this effects one's driving. This is the result of the three sessions.

Session One

For the first meeting, I got testimonials from each of the drivers and how they each describe their driving style. These are some of the questions which were asked in the test.

All of them reported that they enjoy a variety of music while driving. Two out of the three reported that music often influences them to lean into the gas a bit more depending on the "aggressiveness" or speed of the music. Two stated that they give themselves 5-10 minutes and said that it is not enough time. When asked why they don't leave earlier, they explained that either they are lazy or procrastinating. Only two of them smoked but only one smoke while driving. Only one explained that talking while driving is distracting. Other questions addressed emotional states while driving such as driving while angry, sad, nervous, etc. and all of the participants explained that these emotions had some sort of influence on their driving. My purpose in this session was to attain information about the drivers and to tell them to observe their driving and report their results in the next session.

Session Two

This session was held 5 days after the last session. In this session, I inquired about their observations while driving. On this second session, I was informed that though the environment inside the vehicle was important (music, smoking, etc.), but the environment outside the vehicle was more of a concern to them. This posed a problem because it was beginning to stray from my focus of these sessions, so I did what any sensible college student would do. I shifted my focus to include outside influences. They stated the obvious things such as the pace of traffic, irritating or disrespectful drivers, weather, etc. Some things which they mentioned which I really hadn't thought of was the weather, not so much the bad weather but the good weather. They explained that they are in better moods when the weather is better and it's nice and clear outside. From this I began to think that possibly the solar rays have some therapeutic value or perhaps the amount of light has something to do with elevation of mood. This would be out of the scope of my assignment so I really did not go too deep into the topic but I did come up with a simple theory. There are things such as light therapy to treat severely depressed people and it is true that places with very cloudy weather, such as Washington state, has high suicide rates, I concluded that there are some truth to the sun rays elevating their moods. For the next session, I modified my original plan and asked the participants to observe their thought process while driving and their effect on mood and in turn their driving. I asked them to try to notice their mood turning negative and do something (maybe animal sounds just as Dr. Driving does) to diminish their negative mood and turn it into a positive.

Session Three

This session was held 3 days after the last one. In this third and final session, I asked all of the participants of their results to my advice. They sited some instances, getting cut off was named by two, which their mood was challenged. Neither of them followed my advice and made animal sounds but instead they just decided not to think about it and thought about something else. This seemed to have worked because they said that they did not feel as frustrated and was not as grouchy about the whole situation, all in hindsight of coarse. Overall, other than the fact that I had to alter my focus of the sessions, I feel that these sessions went pretty well. I just wish that I could have had more sessions with more time in between to really see some changes because at least two out of the three seemed to show some improvement. I think that if I had to do it again, I would make the personality test serve as an assessment of problem areas so I can come up with a focus, instead of beginning with a focus and then preparing a test to find out more about that one topic. I feel that something like this would only work if the participants are open-minded and are willing to change. Those who stubbornly deny that they have a problem or protest that they are not doing anything wrong would not benefit from such a program. One begins with acknowledgement of their problems and the willingness to change.

 

Driving Improvement Resources on the Web:
Links to Better Driving

 

 

 

Dr. Leon James' Homepage

My Traffic Psychology Class Homepage

My Traffic Psychology Homepage

Tigger's Homepage

Dr. James' Homepage . My Traffic Psychology Class Homepage . My Traffic Psychology Homepage . Tigger's Homepage

MAIL ME!

BACK TO THE TOP