Through my work in psycholinguistics and language teaching, I realized that authenticity is a crucial element in the ability to communicate. When I came to teach at the Manoa campus of the University of Hawaii in 1971, many of my colleagues held lower expectations for students who had gone through the Hawaii public school system, in comparison to 'mainland students.' This impression came from the students' style and level of oral and written communication. But I had another theory.

In the 1960s I conducted a number of workshops for bilingual teachers and their district supervisors for Dade County, Florida. At that time it was the largest school system in the nation and experiencing intense cultural stress from Cuban immigration. My task was to help teachers devise a classroom atmosphere that would (A) reduce cultural conflict between English speaking and Spanish speaking students, and (B), motivate English speaking students to learn Spanish.

Social Forces in the Classroom

In earlier grades teachers put up students' work on the bulletin board. Look at the social forces this practice creates. The act of "posting" the children's work makes it public and official. The child receives the feeling of "My work is real. The teacher put it up. Everyone can see it." This is a feeling of self-validation, an important affective skill that helps prevent low self-esteem and underachievement. This approach is effective only if the act in question is authentic. In other words, it has to be a "real" bulletin board, not a pretend one. Bulletin boards are a real part of classrooms, and posting student work is a real part of American public schools. In the classroom, the teacher's act of posting makes it real. Parents and teachers know with pleasure, the intense seriousness and pride with which children deliver their work to the parent. "Here, look at what I did." In these six words I saw the solution to teaching oral and written communication skills in the classroom. It is not enough to have practiced and finished a work. In order for the experience to be assimilated and applied, it must be validated or authenticated. When the parent looks at the student's work and accepts it for what it is, the student is validated, the learning experience assimilated, and growth has taken place. More learning is now possible so that there is cumulation from basic to advanced.

In the Florida school situation, my solution was to modify teachers' focus from bilingualism to biculturalism. In the workshops, I had us practice making up all sorts of class activities and written assignments on the basis of two criteria: collaboration and authenticity. The first meant that students accomplished the work as a team. The second required a real purpose, that is, one within the students' daily experience and life. In my college classrooms, I implemented over 100 instructional management techniques to create the community classroom generational approach.

Generational Curriculum Principles for Assignments

1. term paper topics are chosen by the students from a cumulative generational list to which they also contribute suggestions for future students.
2. all assigned reports are written for future students as the target audience, not the instructor.
3. all reports are voluntarily donated to the generational curriculum archives which are kept in a designated area by the instructor.
4. each succeeding generation of students reads, uses, and maintains the archives through assigned and supervised activities.
5. two kinds of reports are required: those submitted as a team with multiple authors, and those written and produced by the student independently.
6. when reports are submitted as a joint effort, all authors receive equal credit for it (e.g., grade).
7. when a project was carried out as a team, each member is required to write it up separately, on their own.
8. all student reports are shared in the classroom with exercises specifically designed to elicit peer comment and evaluation.
9. student reports are never defined as complete, and can be improved or added to at any time throughout the semester (and even beyond, when they are no longer students).
10. students are given three choices at the end of the semester:
    
    • to leave their reports behind, as is (90% choose this)
    • to leave their reports but removing their name or editing them in some way
    • to take their reports with them.
11. students are coached to write only what they understand and believe in, so they can take full responsibility for intellectual content (any sentence they write that does not conform to this rule is labeled "plagiarism" unless placed in quotation marks with a citation).
12. weekly homework assignments insure the systematic processing of the generational curriculum archives by each generation; it is thus a major component of the course content.
13. assignments are made generationally cumulative to the extent possible, using the metaphor of "standing on the shoulders of the prior generation."
14. each new class of students is officially designated by its generational ID (G1, G2, ..., G5, etc.). Ceremonies, logos, group songs, nominations, awards, and group photos are some of the methods I use to create group dynamic forces of solidarity, identification, emulation, and competitive achievement orientation.
15. when possible, student reports are published or made available to larger audiences for use in science, education, or socializing (PLATO, the World Wide Web, and e-mail have all been very successful publication media in my experience)
16. oral communication exercises in class use the generational curriculum as content. Examples:
    
    • students pick a report in advance and give a brief (5 min.) presentation on its content, with their reaction or evaluation. Other students listen and are required to ask each speaker at least three questions.
    • students are arranged in teams and sub-group for a few minutes, preparing a team response on a topic from the generational archives. Each team member must speak. Listeners must ask questions.
    • whenever students present something formally, it is required that they introduce themselves out loud and clearly, using both first and last names.
17. members of every generation are expected to volunteer for maintenance activities that the generational curriculum requires, such as scanning in the work of pre-Internet generations, up dating links in hypertext, and creating orientation and "tour guides" for cybernaut visitors.
18. students are given the opportunity to do post-semester volunteer work such as being monitors in the computer lab, coaching other students, or maintenance work on the ever expanding generational virtual superdocument.
19. student work is expected to be scholarly, scientific, or service oriented in intent, rather then merely personal. For example, they create and manage Web generational databases which collect data or "contributions" from visitors. Students thus learn how to "market" or advertise their Home Pages using e-mail announcements, registering with search engines, participating in listserv newsgroups, and so on.

• Personality and Pets
• Dog Assisted Therapy
• Personality and Occupation
• Paranormal and Personality
• Analyzing My Daily Round
• Cognitive Maps of My Knowledge
• My Parents' Influence on My Personality
• My Money Thoughts and Concerns
• Social Psychology of Songs and Dreams
• Techniques for Modifying My Food Behavior
• My Resistance to Flossing
• Transcripts and Analysis of My Family Dinner Table Talk
• Traffic Psychology Reports on My Personality as a Driver
• Overcoming My Technophobia and Computerphobia
• Spiritual Psychology of Swedenborg
• Tracing Intriguing Ideas in the History of Psychology
• Nutrition, Exercise and Health
• How I Came to Understand Statistics
• Electronic Course-Integrated Socializing with PLATO
• My Learning and Adapting to the Internet
• Online Pathfinders to Favorite Topics on the Web
• Personality of Pets
• Cyberpsychology of Electronic Learning Community
• Annotated Bibliographies on Various Subjects:
  • driving and alcohol
  • gender differences and marriage
  • death and dying
  • abortion
  • aggression and TV
  • gender roles on TV
  • zen therapies
  • health psychology
  • religion and spirituality

1. World Wide Access:
   Student reports are accessible world wide through browsing and powerful search engines that locate their work. In effect, students have become published authors and scientists, and have acquired a public persona and reputation
2. Multimedia Presentations:
   Student reports are in multimedia form. This creates the social condition for individual expressiveness, creativity, and identity, far surpassing the print medium, which restricted all reports to shelves in a building somewhere. Icons, logos, photographs, artsy backgrounds, and interactive communication through e-mail are used by students with enthusiasm and great frequency
3. Virtual Reality:
   Student reports and multimedia productions (known as "Home Pages") are gradually built up into a virtual reality cybercommunity, thanks to the power of hypertext. Each generation adds inter-connectivity features, tunneling deeper into the virtual generational cybercommunity. This hypertext feature insures that the generational curriculum not only grows in physical size, but in the complexity of its virtual reality. Its educational and scientific value will thus automatically grow with time. If institutionalized through a department or school, the generational curriculum can continue forever, spanning the careers of individual teachers. Children and grandchildren of the students who participated, can later look up the work of their parents and grandparents, and feel a sense of continuity and validation. Truly, the curriculum in this format, becomes a national treasure!

• Jakobovits, L. A. (1969). Second Language Learning and Transfer Theory: A Theoretical Assessment. Language Learning, 19, 55-86.
• Jakobovits, L. A. (1970). Foreign Language Learning: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Issues. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
• Jakobovits, L. A. (1972). Authenticity in Foreign Language Teaching. In S. Savignon (Ed.), Toward Communicative Competence: An Experiment in Foreign Language Teaching. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.
• Jakobovits, L. A. (1982). Authentic Language Teaching Through Culture-Simulation in the Classroom. Bulletin of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 9-30.
• Jakobovits, L. A. (1991). Course-Integrated Electronic Socializing on PLATO. UHCC Newsletter, 28(2), 12-14.Available online here.
• Jakobovits, L. A. (1993). A Review of "Bilingual Education: Issues and Strategies" by Padilla, Fairchild, and Valdadez (Eds.). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(4), 261-262.
• Jakobovits, L. A., & Nahl, D. (1979). Social Psychology: Studying Community-Building Forces. Honolulu, HI: Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii (available at Hamilton Library).
• Jakobovits, L. A., & Nahl, D. (1981). Applied Psycholinguistics for the1980's: Student-done Discourse Analysis and the Videotape Language Lab. The Linguistic Reporter(April), 11-13.
• Jakobovits, L. A., & Nahl-Jakobovits, D. (1978). Society's Witnesses: Experiencing Formative Issues in Social Psychology. Honolulu, HI: Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii (available at Hamilton Library).
• James, L. (1995). Course Integrated Use of the World Wide Web. InfoBITS -- University of Hawaii Information Technology Services, 2(2), 8-9. Pre-publication version available online.
• James, L., & Bogan, K. (1995). Analyzing Linkage Structure in a Course-Integrated Virtual Learning Community on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the INET '95 Conference, Honolulu, HI. Pre-publication version available online.
• Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Nahl, D. (1996). Taxonomic Inventory of Affective and Cognitive Behaviors While Learning and Adapting to the Internet, ASIS Proceedings. American Society for Information Science. Pre-publication copy available online.
• Nahl, D. (1996b). The User-Centered Revolution, 1970-1995. In J. Cacciottoli (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Microcomputers, (Vol. 19, ). New York: Marcel Dekker. Pre-publication draft available online.
• Nahl-Jakobovits, D., & Jakobovits, L. A. (1987). Teaching the Analysis of Titles: Dependent and Independent Variables in Research Articles. Research Strategies, 5(4), 164-171.