flame.gif (12347 bytes)Click here to see List of Swedenborg's Writings

Related Articles:

The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband  || Theistic Psychology || Spiritual Geography--Part 2: Jacob's Ladder and Other Psycho-Dynamic Applications|| Spiritual Geography--Part 1-- Graphic Maps of Consciousness for Regeneration || Dual Citizenship || Spiritual Psychology  || Spiritual Time and Space || De Hemelsche Leer Article || Theistic Science ||
Religious Psychology || Discrete Degrees: A Top Down Presentation (Ian Thompson)

I would be delighted to know your reactions. Please email Leon James

Doctrine of the Wife for Husbands:
A Spiritual Practice for Achieving Unity

by Leon James
Date: 1985-2004

Part 1 of 4

Go to the other parts:
Part 1 || Part 2 || Part 3 ||
Part 4

Note:  You may want to consult a more recent version of this essay:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/wife.html

CONTENTS

Part 1
1. Prologue

2. Preface
3. Feminizing the Marriage is Santifying It
4. Heresies Regarding the Husband's Wisdom
5. The Role of the Wife in the Husband's Wisdom
6. The Basic Map for Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1)
7. Comments
(by Leon James (2001) on Rev. Erik Sandstr?m, Sr's   Article (1997) on Feminine Wisdom  in New Church Life and a Reprinted Reaction by Linda Simonetti Odhner (1997)
8. E
mail Exchange on the Doctrine of the Wife
For comments please email Leon James

1. Prologue

One of the truly remarkable revelations given in the Writings of Swedenborg is that the chief power and dynamic spiritual force that animates the universe is conjugial love, the love that internally binds and unites the minds of a husband and wife. Conjugial love is the chief love that rules all other loves in the universe. Its extending power and influence can be seen in all living species whose survival depends on male-female bonding for propagation. The supremacy of conjugial love expresses God's chief purpose in creating and maintaining the universe. This purpose is to create an ever growing heaven populated by angel couples who were born on some earth, developed a spiritual mind by living rightly, then went on living to eternity in one of the many heavenly societies Swedenborg has witnessed. The afterlife consists of a heavenly life for soul-mates bonded in marriage love between a husband and a wife. This life constitutes the highest human spiritual state and is called heaven. The inhabitants of heaven are all human beings born on one of the many earths in the universe and are called angels in the Writings. We can truly say that this revelation is indeed very good news.

The bad news is that conjugial life does not come to us automatically and that most people on this earth reject it and act against it, especially men. The reason is that we inherit our parents' traits, both physical and spiritual or mental. Scientists today are still unaware of these revelations in the Writings. It is believed that psychological traits are not inherited, and is is not known that psychological traits are spiritual organs constructed out of spiritual substances from the spiritual world. These spiritual substances are carriers of the mental or spiritual traits of the parents. We thus inherit tendencies that oppose conjugial love. One example is people's desire to know more than one partner sexually. Individuals who exhibit this interest out of religious or loyalty reasons, continue to experience the desire for or interest in other partners. But conjugial love does not allow this interest to remain in one's organic constitution, even when it is expressed merely hypothetically or in fantasy.

"This tendency and proneness to evils just mentioned, which is transmitted from parents to their children and descendants, can only be broken down by a person being born anew by the Lord's help, a process called regeneration. Without this not only does the tendency remain unbroken, but it is reinforced by a succession of parents, becoming more prone to evils, and eventually to every kind of evil." True Christian Religion Number 521

Another example of how conjugial love is opposed by inherited traits is our desire for independence based on the false idea that the individual is the unit of life and self-fulfillment. When people marry there is often a feeling of loss of freedom due to the marriage bond. But this idea is false because the bonds of marriage and union create a state of heavenly freedom while what is opposed to this bond is rooted in infernal freedom, which is actually slavery to inherited evil traits. Conjugial love establishes the married couple as the unit of human life giving the partners a wholeness and completeness they do not have outside the union. Independence is incompatible with wholeness, and this reality is resisted by many inherited and acquired traits.

For conjugial love to develop with a couple it is necessary for both husband and wife to overcome the inborn resistance they have for it. Marriage starts in the external mind of the partners through commitment and natural love for one another. This love is not yet conjugial love, which is a spiritual love, and the relationship is not yet a spiritual one, not yet an inner union of minds. In order for conjugial love to develop and grow the husband and wife must change their inner character by defeating all the inherited forces that are opposed to their conjugial union. The Writings teach that only couples who go beyond the external bond of marriage into an internal union of minds, can be together as an angel couple in heaven. It is therefore of the utmost importance to gain the knowledge of how to accomplish this since it doesn't happen automatically even with married individuals who sincerely love each other from a natural love and are devoted to each other from loyalty and friendship.

The Writings show how the natural love between partners joinjed together through an external bond is not spiritually deep enough and as soon as external conditions change and become a challenge, the love seems to evaporate and instead there is anger, rage, resentment, and disdain. Due to the spiritual constitution of men and women, there is more resistance to conjugial love on the part of husbands. Wives are born with the inclination towards marriage and a desire to move on to an internal or spiritual union, as long as the husband also desires it. Husbands on the other hand are born with an inclination for having multiple sexual partners and feel restricted and constricted by the marriage bond to one wife. As a result, husbands need special help in order to be able to overcome their inborn resistance to conjugial love, which is "the love for one of the sex," as the Writings put it, in contrast to the "love of the sex," which is natural, not spiritual, and roving. The Doctrine of the Wife is an expression we use to designate a philosophy of action for husbands based on the Writings of Swedenborg and intended to help them overcome their resistance to conjugial love.

In summary, this doctrine says that the husband's regeneration or self-change efforts, to be successful, must be focused on his wife and through his wife. She is to be accepted as the seeing eye in the marriage relationship and he needs to agree to voluntarily subjugate all of his resistances to her wisdom and inner perception in everything pertaining to their relationship. Swedenborg explains the mechanism whereby the Lord gives a special perception to each wife about her husband's affections and inclinations, knowledge which is not given to the husband so that he is only dimly aware of his own inner tendencies. The spiritual purpose for this difference in perceptual powers is to make the husband's regeneration dependent on his wife. This is called "cleaving to the wife" in the Old Testament and is a Divine commandment enjoined on every husband. Without following this commandment the husband cannot be regenerated, hence cannot have an eternal marriage in heaven with this or any other wife.

"People who are in a state of truly conjugial love look to eternity in their marriage because eternity is inherent in this love. Its eternity is owing to the fact that this love in the wife and wisdom in the husband grow to eternity, and as these grow or progress, the partners enter more and more deeply into the blessings of heaven - blessings which their wisdom and love of wisdom at the same time carry concealed within them. If one were to snatch away an idea of eternity, therefore, or if by some chance it should slip from their minds, it would be as though they were cast down from heaven. (Conjugial Love No. 216)

In people who did not have conjugial love there is no spiritual or inner bond, but only a natural or outer one; and if an inner bond does not hold the outer one in its order and course, it does not last." (Conjugial Love No. 320)

Conjugial union depends therefore on the willigness of the two partners to modify their inner character into a form that makes them fit together spiritually. Since husbands put up more resistance to this union than wives, it is necessary to give them spiritual tools that can overcome their own internal resistance.

  See also The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband

The Doctrine of the Wife is an expression I use to designate a philosophy of doing for husbands based on the Writings of Swedenborg. In essence, this doctrine says that the husband's regeneration efforts, to be successful, must be focused on his wife and through his wife. She is the seeing eye in the marriage relationship and he needs to voluntarily and willingly subjugate all his resistances to her wisdom and inner perception. Swedenborg explains the mechanism whereby God gives perception to each wife about her husband's affections which is not given to the husband. The purpose being, obviously, to make the husband's regeneration dependent on his reliance on the wife. This is called "cleaving to the wife" and is a commandment of God enjoined on every husband. Without this commandment the husband cannot be regenerated, hence cannot have an eternal marriage with this or any other wife.

"In people who did not have conjugial love there is no spiritual or inner bond, but only a natural or outer one; and if an inner bond does not hold the outer one in its order and course, it does not last" (CL 320).

 

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love

159. (3) A wife's will unites itself with her husband's understanding, and the husband's understanding in consequence unites itself with his wife's will. The reason is that a male is born to become a form of understanding, and a female to become a form of will that loves the understanding of the male. It follows from this that the conjugial union is a union of the wife's will with the husband's understanding, and a reciprocal union of the husband's understanding with the wife's will. Everyone sees that there is a very close union between understanding and will, and that the union is such that the one faculty can enter into the other and find delight from and in that union.

From Swedenborg's Heaven and Hell

HH 369. Everyone, man or woman, enjoys understanding and will; but with the man the understanding predominates, and with the woman the will predominates, and the character is determined by that which predominates. Yet in marriages in the heavens there is no predominance; for the will of the wife is also the husband's will, and the understanding of the husband is also the wife's understanding, since each loves to will and think as the other, that is, mutually and reciprocally. Thus are they conjoined into one. This is actual conjunction, for the will of the wife enters into the understanding of the husband, and the understanding of the husband into the will of the wife, and this especially when they look into one another's faces . . . . From all this it can be established what the conjunction of minds is that makes marriage and produces conjugial love in the heavens, namely, that one wishes what is his own to be the other's, and this reciprocally.

The above passages clearly shows that the conjugial couple makes up a single angel in that the husband's understanding is no longer united to his own will but to his wife's will. This is the essential idea in the Doctrine of the Wife.

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love (CL 294)

"Every man who is not spiritually rational and moral but only naturally so possesses a coldness towards his wife, such a coldness being inherent in him in his inmost elements.  (...) It comes from a lack of rationality on their part in matters of the spirit. Every man who is irrational in matters of the spirit is inmostly cold to his wife and inmostly warm toward harlots."

I have discovered that husbands resist the process of conjugial unification with such intensity and ferocity that it appears they are hell-bent and insisting on destroying their union, their marriage, their heavenly place with their wife. This is true whether the husband is a New Church person or not. Even those husbands who love the Writings and consider it the Word, experience this resistance and hatred for conjugial union. They are not aware of it and they deny it, yet it is true. For the wife this is a major problem since by denying their resistance and hatred, husbands neutralize the power of the wife to work towards the conjugial unity. This makes the wife suffer and feel desperate. The Doctrine of the Wife will help husbands become aware of their resistance and hatred of their wife, which at first they deny, but later can acknowledge or confess, then change. Husbands misread and sub-consciously distort the above passage, and many passages like it which are mentioned in this article.

This distortion effect is natural and inherited as well as fully supported and reinforced by a masculinized society and culture.  New Church husbands have a distinct opportunity to liberate themselves from this inheritance, but it takes a method to achieve liberation from it. This method is the Doctrine of the Wife, a collection of commandments given by the Lord to help New Church husbands to achieve conjugial union. Like all genuine Doctrine of the Church, the Doctrine of the Wife is spiritual out of a celestial origin, that is, from the Lord. All Doctrine is given by the Lord to anyone who is willing to receive it. Without genuine Doctrine the Writings cannot be understood.

1. Without doctrine no one can understand the Word. 2. Without doctrine from the Word no one can fight against evils and falsities, and disperse them. 3. Without doctrine from the Word no one within the church, where the Word is, can become spiritual. 4. Doctrine can be acquired from no other source than from the Word, and by none except those who are in illustration from the Lord. 5. All things of doctrine must be confirmed by the sense of the letter of the Word.  AE 356

Note: substitute "the Writings" where it says "the Word" and your eyes will be opened!

Many passages discussing men's understanding and women's affections are interpreted as meaning that men should rule over women (or "have predominance") in relation to understanding or intellectual things, since men are born a form of understanding. Women on the other hand, should rule (or "have predominance") in relation to affectional things relating to feelings and love. We must draw a distinction between (a) What the Word says in the literal, and (b) The conclusion we draw from it (=doctrine). In this case the Word says that men are a form of understanding and women a form of love. But the erroneous conclusion based on it says: (c) Therefore in matters of Church governance or some other forensic or intellectual issue, men should predominate; but in matters of domestic order and works of charity or community, women should predominate.

Part (a) is far from Part (c), as is obvious. Part (c) is a political matter and whatever applications one makes to it from Doctrine or the Word is neither the Word nor Doctrine. No part of the genuine Doctrine of the Church or the Word says that men should predominate in Church administration or that women should be excluded from it. The same is true of any human or social area: the workplace, business, commerce, the military, education, science, engineering, parenthood, politics, etc. In short, it is not correct to say that the Word or the genuine doctrine of the Church gives men the Divine right to be have predominance over women in any area whatsoever.

The claim that men should predominate over women in decision making in any area of life is clearly a self-serving distortion of a masculinized society. The distortion guarantees that men will rule over women in everyday life--at home, Church, profession, or in managing things, making the final decisions, prevailing in one's opinion, in short, creating a man's world. Instead, the passage above means that the husband's understanding should unite with the wife's will. The will always rules the understanding, therefore this means that it is the wife's affections that are to unite to the husband's understanding on a voluntary basis by the husband. The affections in the will shape the cognitions in the understanding. Thus it is the feminization of marriage that makes its sanctification--see section below.

Whether you say "ruling over" or "having predominance over" is the same thing in terms of the factual consequences, which is that one rules over the other. But there is an essential difference between ruling over someone by dominance or dominion, and ruling over someone by voluntary submission. For instance, the police force in a democracy rules over the population in daily activities in public places. This is not an oppression as long as the population willingly and rationally submits to the authority of the law and its authorized or licensed agents acting in a lawful manner. But in an autocratic country the law rules by dominion and is hostile to the population. With the Doctrine of the Wife we are dealing with the husband's voluntary and rational submission of his will and judgment to that of his wife. If he refuses, there is nothing she can do since he has the greater power. In other words, the husband must listen and follow the wife's directives in all things in which they have interactions. This voluntary submission means that he has to re-adjust his cognitions to harmonize with her affections. Obviously this must be a voluntary submission on the part of the husband and not a dominion over him by his wife. The latter of course is destructive of the conjugial union.

Note again the passage quoted above: "Every man who is not spiritually rational and moral but only naturally so possesses a coldness towards his wife, such a coldness being inherent in him in his inmost elements.  (...) It comes from a lack of rationality on their part in matters of the spirit. Every man who is irrational in matters of the spirit is inmostly cold to his wife and inmostly warm toward harlots" (CL 294).

New Church people who acknowledge the Writings as the Word may have this temptation: that because they possess the Third Testament or the Latin Word, therefore they are spiritual. However the Writings clearly teach that it is not the Word that makes the Church but the understanding of the Word, and not even this, but the degree to which people live in accordance with their understanding of the Word (AE 356). And so study and expertise in the Writings of Swedenborg does not in itself make us spiritual. Therefore husbands who study the Writings and worship the Divine Human remain natural, hate the conjugial, love the scortatory, and remain unregenerate to the extent that they fail to live their daily life in accordance with their doctrine. The Doctrine of the Wife helps husbands live their life according to their understanding of Divine Truth. We must create adequate and effective doctrine for ourselves so that we may strive to live according to it. It is in this striving alone that the Lord is present by influx. Without this striving the Lord cannot be present in actuality.

See also The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband

2. Preface

"A woman's beauty resides in her gentle tenderness, and so in her exquisite powers of feeling. This is the source of a woman's love for a man, and a man's love for a woman." (CL 330).

In the Heavenly Doctrines known as Swedenborg's Writings, the Lord has given a number of new commandments to husbands who aspire to become one angel with a conjugial wife. The Doctrine of the Wife is a collection of these commandments and its purpose is to assist regenerating husbands in their difficult task. The Doctrine of the Wife is doctrine based on Scripture because it is a list of items collected and extracted from the Word. The Doctrine of the Wife is not an opinion statement or philosophy but Divine Wisdom as received in revelation through illustration from the Lord. The Doctrine of the Wife is an ever expanding body of knowledge, even to infinity and eternity. Countless generations of regenerating husbands will contribute to it through the expansion and deepening of our relationship to the Lord. Through it conjugial love will return to this earth and the societies of earth will return to a state of civilized paradise. This new state of culture and consciousness will be higher than all the preceding states of humanity. This is the Lord's deep desire--as He has revealed it to us in the Writings.

The future of humanity thus depends on the success of husbands each learning to conjoin to his wife on the internal plane of the mind. This internal conjunction is called conjugial love and is the basis of all other loves in the universe. All other loves are derivative of this one great love. But the husband cannot from his own self conjoin to his wife in an internal way. He appears to be able to do this in the external mind, but he cannot do anything at all in the internal mind for he cannot see the internal mind. It is closed to his conscious awareness while he is still in the early stages of regeneration. Only the angels inflow into this internal mind but not the husband's own consciousness or effort. By acknowledging the Doctrine of the Wife, and then striving to follow it, each husband is spiritually empowered by the Lord to overcome himself and, to enthrone the wife. To enthrone the wife means to conjoin his affections with his wife's affections. This can be done only by loving her affections, and that means following her will, for the will does what the affection loves. Hence the Lord gave husbands a long list of commandments to follow in order to allow them to achieve this internal union, each with their wife. The Doctrine of the Wife is not only a collection of these commandments but an exposition of them to the best of our current understanding.

Here are some examples of conjugial commandments for husbands:

(1) All human development is in relation to marriage (see CL 191), therefore unmarried men are to be considered "pre-husbands" in the sense we think of "preschool" as a state that prepares for the real school. The curriculum in biology and psychology, for instance, needs to introduce all concepts and goals as a hierarchy with the top of it always being the conjugial couple.

(2) Husbands are wiser and more spiritual than unmarried men (see CL 199). The Lord's commandment in the Old and New Testaments that a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife, means that the man should dethrone his own affections ("father and mother") and enthrone his wife's affections in his own mind, thus to "cleave" unto her (see CL 194).

(3) Women's intelligence is like the Lord's intelligence, but men's intelligence is not (CL 218). Women's intelligence, like the Lord's, is "modest, gracious, peaceable, compliant, soft and gentle," while men's is "critical, rough, resistant, argumentative, and given to intemperance."

(4) Conjugial love is the state of internal union between husband and wife and it is achieved when they will that their two lives shall become one life (see CL 215). Conjugial love is a biological growth process that is achieved when the wife's affections are joined to the husband's cognitions, that is, the husband's cognitions are joined to the wife's affections. This is not  an automatic growth process that comes with living together. It must be willed by both partners. The husband must will to conjoin his own cognitions to his wife's affections. This is not easy to achieve and requires persistent effort into which the Lord's power can inflow and achieve the union. The husband can overcome his resistance entirely if he is willing to follow this one rule on a daily and regular basis: When his wife expresses her affections in the form of a direct request or an implied one, the husband has only these replies to give and follow:

And never anything more than that, for it is always defensive and disagreeable to the wife's affections.

(5) If marriage remains external or fails altogether, it is always due to the husband's resistance and hatred of conjugial love (see CL 216-217). Women never cease their striving to conjoin internally to their husbands. There are women in hell of course, and we get to know the character of many through Swedenborg's discussions with them. They have revealed that they abandoned their striving for conjunction only after their husbands treated them cruelly and without love on a long term basis, even to their whole life together. The women then chose to protect themselves and fight back by learning the art of controlling and enslaving their men through seduction and other subtle means. But they would not have done this if their husbands had treated them decently.

(6) To the husband's sensual consciousness, which is that of the external mind, the wife appears as an object of sexual desire. He imagines that the desire is from himself and that she is its object. But when a husband's rational consciousness is awakened in his internal mind, he can see that the wife is not the object but the source of his desire (see CL 221-223). If you remove the wife's influx of sexual desire into her husband, the husband loses all feeling and interest for the female sex. This secret is kept by wives since they can notice that the man is made impotent and turns away when he experiences the woman's love entering him. But after they are conjoined in the internal mind, the wife shares all her feelings and expresses all her emotions without fear or ill effect on the husband.

(7) Conjugial love grows biologically through repeatedly going through these four conjoining steps on a daily and hourly basis:

This commandment says that the husband must strive constantly to build up the network of conjoining between his cognitions and his wife's affections. Think about muscle building exercises,  how we repeat the same movement in series or sets during one workout session. Muscle tissue is built up, fiber by fiber, molecule by molecule, with each repetition of a movement. In a similar manner the husband builds up the fibers of conjunction with his wife with the series and sets of repetitions on a daily basis, even an hourly basis or more.  Here is a common example every man can relate to:

Steps The usual way
(does not build any conjoining fibers)
The conjugial way
(builds conjoining fibers)
1 Wife says: Honey, let's talk about this tomorrow (=her request or opening act). Wife says: Honey, let's talk about this tomorrow (=her request or opening act).
2 The husband internally disagrees (=hates conjugial unity). He wants to tell her several reasons why they should talk about it now (=discounts her intelligence). He thinks about those reasons and loves them (=holding on to father and mother). He is conscious of an inner feeling of anger and his mind begins to rehearse reasons why they should talk about it now. But he just laughs at himself doing that. He turns away from himself and turns to his wife and to her desire and intention (or affection). He embraces her affection and immerses himself in it (=cleaves to his wife).
3 He says: You don't understand. And keeps talking for several more sentences (=striving to coerce her behavior and deny her freedom). He says: O.K. Sure.
4 The wife senses her husband's conjugial cold and experiences the pain and loneliness of internal separation. In her chest she senses his rejection or refusal to conjoin his cognition to her affection. The wife senses conjugial delight in her chest and experiences her husband's act of conjoining with her (=one flesh). One more pair of her affection and his cognition are now united and function as one conjoint   individual (=angel).

Many many times my poor wife tried to tell me that I talk to her defensively. A family trait, she added, to spurn me on to insight. For years, yea-- decades, my response was to deny that I was defensive. Each time we went through this routine, the conjugial separation she felt was  made more painful and desperate. What could she do to break down this wall of blindness and denial? She was getting so tired. She was getting no relief, year after year. At last the Doctrine of the Wife happened in my life. The Lord showed me in illustration while reading the Word that Hearken Unto Sarah was a commandment. Later I was able to see the biological perspective on the Doctrine of the Wife. That's when my regeneration really started showing results. For a long time I merely was able to compel my external behavior, putting on  a pleasant expression on my face and compelling my mouth to express the opposite of the defensive and offensive things I thought and felt whenever she was in my face and not budging an inch. She would never never compromise.

At first my wife was cowed into silent and passive acceptance of my affections. She loved my cognitions and instantly and constantly conjoined herself with them, making them as-if her own. She saw and understood what I saw and understood about anything and everything I had an interest in. She was my cognitive clone. But she was more than this for she had her own cognitive mind and she deftly used my cognitions in all situations, far surpassing me in many kinds of things. I admired her. I was not jealous of her. I felt superior and inferior to her. But she did not love my affections.

And I thank the Lord for that. She battled my affections fiercely for years. She tried to show me that my affections were not mine but instilled in me by my family and upbringing. All this happened before I met her. Now that I married her, she argued, I was supposed to abandon my family affections and espouse hers. then we can make a true couple. I went along with this idea philosophically, but not actually. At last the Lord sent the Doctrine of the Wife. Now I was able to see the many commandments the Lord gives in the Writings. Eventually I was able to accept, love, and promote the idea of the Doctrine of the Wife. I know that my wife is appreciative. I no longer make her cry on a regular basis! From the cold frozen tundra where I made a house for her, I brought her away from the North  and built a house in the East where we sojourn happily towards the real paradise of internal conjugial union. This is the house of the Doctrine of the Wife.

Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:08:12 -1000
To: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu

Subject: Re: Yes. OK. I will. That's right.

Leon,

I think one thing that I've not realized fully before is that the Doctrine of the Wife is not your own invention, your own fancy. It is built solidly upon the Word and the Writings.

It is not your ingenuity, you are but the channel. Your skill and talent may however be to present it in the modern idiom.

I'm beginning to see that the DOW is indeed the deepest and ultimate yoga we as men can submit ourselves to. Perhaps because it goes so directly against our grain.

I'm trying to practice it more and more each day. But it is not easy. In the past I always projected my irritation and anger to my wife, punishing her for my inadequacies.. Now I try to curb the process. Some days I'm more successful than others.
Peace,
A.

Here is another common example. Remember the four steps of forming a conjugial fiber:

Steps The usual way
(does not build conjoining fibers)
The conjugial way
(builds conjoining fibers)
1 Wife continues to clean up and arrange things while husband watches the news. She is very much aware that she is doing this in front of him. Is he going to ignore her, she wonders. She is letting him see that she is determined to finish. Wife continues to clean up and arrange things while husband watches the news. She is very much aware that she is doing this in front of him. Is he going to ignore her, she wonders. She is letting him see that she is determined to finish.
2 The husband sees her but feels cold for her.   He hates the fact she picks this time to buzz around the room, trying to make him feel guilty, no doubt, he tells himself  (=discounts her intelligence). He thinks about many reasons why she is wrong and he is right, and loves them (=holding on to father and mother). The husband sees her and is instantly aroused by the sight of her slaving away while he does what pleases him. How can he ignore her affection in completing this task? It doesn't make a difference what he thinks about it. Here she is and he must respond. He sees her presence as his business and he makes himself accept the affection that animates her task orientation (=cleaves to his wife).
3 He says: Honey, do you have to do that now? (=striving to coerce her behavior and deny her freedom). He immediately presses the mute button, gets up, and begins to facilitate her movements. It's as if he said "O.K. I will" to her silent request for sympathy and recognition.
4 The wife senses her husband's conjugial cold and experiences the pain and loneliness of internal separation. In her chest she senses his rejection or refusal to conjoin his cognition to her affection. The wife senses conjugial delight in her chest and experiences her husband's act of conjoining with her (=one flesh). One more pair of her affection and his cognition are now united and function as one conjoint   individual (=angel).

Here is a third example:

 

The usual way

(does not build conjoining fibers)

The conjugial way

(builds conjoining fibers)

Step 1: The wife acts

They are in traffic. Husband is driving. Wife says: “Honey, it’s very stressful driving in the fast lane. Can you please stay in the right lane?” (=her affectional request).

Ditto

Step 2: The husband receives (or rejects)

The husband instantly feels rage (=hates conjugial unity and feels it’s a loss of individuality). “It’s actually safer in this lane. Just let me handle it.” (=discounts her intelligence). “I told you before. Leave the driving to the driver. That’s the way it should be.” (=holding on to father and mother which he shouldn’t do).

He is conscious of an inner feeling of anger and annoyance at her interfering with what he wants to do. But he makes himself look at the situation from her perspective. He turns away from himself and turns to his wife and to her affection and intention.(=cleaves to his wife). He has compassion for her fears.

Step 3: The husband reacts

He says: “Do some deep breathing and relax. You know I hate it when you tell me how to drive.” (=striving to coerce her behavior and deny her freedom).

He says: “O.K. I’ll switch lanes as soon as I can.”

Step 4: The wife reacts to the husband

The wife senses her husband's conjugial cold and experiences the pain and loneliness of internal separation. In her chest she senses his rejection or refusal to conjoin his thoughts to her affection.

The wife senses conjugial delight in her chest and experiences her husband's act of conjoining with her (=one flesh). One more pair of her affections and his thoughts are now united and function as one conjoint individual (=angel).

 

"It is therefore provided by the Lord that conjugial pairs be born, and they are raised and continually prepared for their marriages, neither the boy nor the girl being aware of the fact. Then, after a period of time, the girl - now a marriageable young woman - and the boy - now a young man able to marry - meet somewhere, as though by fate, and notice each other. And they immediately recognize, as if by a kind of instinct, that they are a match, thinking to themselves from a kind of inner dictate, the young man, 'she is mine,' and the young woman, 'he is mine'" (CL 316).

Women have a perception of truth that is more immediate than that of men, whose understanding in comparison is laborious, even pompous. So for women I want to state what is the Doctrine of the Wife in a nutshell (men will need the whole article to understand it, let alone accept it). It is this:

Even though men are born understandings and receive wisdom from the Lord, they cannot hold on to this wisdom or make it their own, unless and until they love their wife's judgment above their own judgment. The husband's wisdom, when genuine, is to know this. The husband's conjugial love is to love this.

The reason for this is that the wife's wisdom is inmost and celestial, from the Lord. The wife's conjugial love is to love the husband's wisdom to the extent it is genuine. Until the husband accepts the Doctrine of the Wife, he is in the delusion that he has genuine understanding of his own, from the Lord, independently of the wife.

This delusion is confirmed by doctrinal heresies they fabricate from the literal of the Writings. In this state of mind they discriminate against women, discount their judgment, and abuse them. This they refuse to recognize. Thus they are trapped. The Doctrine of the Wife for Husbands is my way of sharing with them what I have learned and what I was given to discover. In this way I invite all husbands to follow the practices enjoined by the Doctrine of the Wife so that they may have conjugial love, and thus eternal union with their wife.

Wives who read the Doctrine of the Wife for Husbands will experience a deep joy and renewed hope that their dearest longing is not a fiction but a Divine reality that awaits them.

"Conjugial love is in the same measure a conjunction of minds, and the conjunction remains during the bodily life of the one after the passing of the other. This conjunction holds any inclination to remarry in balance as though in a scale, and tips the scale its way to the degree that true love has been embraced" (CL 318).

3. Feminizing the Marriage is Sanctifying It

Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001
From: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu 
Subject: Re: Feminization of the Church

When I read Dr. Bell's article (NCL, May 2001) I had this reaction regarding the "feminization of the Church" idea. The fact that more women attend Church than men do, or that men are leaving the Church while women are staying, is taken as evidence that the Church has been feminized and doesn't serve men's spiritual needs. I think this is a leap of fantasy and is made within a biased scope against women. I had this bias against women, just about all men have this anti-feminine bias from up bringing. It has been socialized into us men that we are superior to women.

I have had to work hard against myself, with the courageous aid of my wife, for many years, to rid myself of this anti-conjugial idea we men receive from our culture and family. Mothers too conspire in this for they are the ones who raise the boys, along with the fathers, of course. But mothers have also come to believe in the superiority of men. Girls are brought up that way and consume the same cultural attitudes expressed in the mass media. In other countries this is even more explicit and gross, with the result of the horrible abuse of women, to the shame of the men who lead and govern those countries.

As long as men lord it over women, explicitly or subtly, they cannot enter into a relationship of unity with their wife. Thus they cannot have conjugial love. They cannot regenerate. They are going to hell. I was on that road, drawn inevitably, like a ship is drawn by a current. The Lord weeps and works ceaselessly to convince us we should stop. He tells us in the Writings that a wife is given to each man by Him to cure the man from his madness, his arrogance. So arrogant that men will not go to Church as a way of affirming their pure arrogance. They say with the mouth I believe, with the heart they deny. How utterly sad. And yet the Good News is that we men can change, if we cooperate with the Lord. For me, this cooperation process is explained as the Doctrine of the Wife (which was mentioned here before).

This doctrine says that our wife is the love of our wisdom, not us. When we love our wisdom, we are in hell. To get out of hell we must cease to love our own wisdom above the wisdom of the wife whom the Lord gave us to save ourselves from hell. This is the Doctrine of the Wife. Her judgment must be elevated in our mind above our judgment. This I endeavor to practice in my life, and to the extent that I'm sincere, to that extent I succeed in evolving into a conjugial husband. There is no other way in achieving internal unity between husband and wife. This is the only way because conjugial unition is a process of spiritual biology.

The idea in the Doctrine of the Wife is resisted by men. Men will go as far as saying, OK, let's have equality instead of men's superiority. This is Satan's subterfuge! I used it too. But equality is necessary, of course--for the outside world. Women should have equal rights to men and vice versa when it comes to law, custom, and image or status. This is just a matter of human decency. But to achieve conjugial union, the unition process between woman and man must also go on in the internal mind. To carry over the idea of equality in the internal mind is to resist conjugial love, to stop regeneration, to go to hell.

In the internal mind there is no equality between husband and wife, but unity. And unity occurs between reciprocal parts, that is, between the husband's cognitive mind ("wisdom") and the woman's affective mind ("love of the husband's wisdom"). Unition must be across the two sexes so that the male supplies the cognitive and the female supplies the affective. Now a new biological entity is born--the conjugial couple, called one Angel in the Writings. This one Angel is biologically formed in only one way.

In every day interactions between a husband and his wife the husband acts like he's got the right to argue with his wife who wants one thing while he wants another thing. This happens with any regular topic--kids, furniture, wall color, visits, attendance, money, gifts, whatever...The husband stands his ground and has all sorts of "reasons" he presents to his wife why he is right. I have done this for many years. I continued to do this despite my studious daily study of the Writings and my pious attitudes expressed in sermonizing and lecturing my students and neighbors. But after my wife's brave and furious and tireless persistence, the Lord bless her mind, I switched in orientation. I formulated the Doctrine of the Wife to remind myself about the Scriptural Commandment that I put my male judgment below my wife's female judgment. Just as the Lord commanded Abraham "Hearken unto Sarah."

It works. It is false to say that the Doctrine of the Wife will "feminize the Church" or that men will leave the Church on account of it. It is false to say that the Doctrine of the Wife gives women superiority or dominion, which is infernal. Dominion of a wife over her husband is just as infernal as the current male-dominated social norms. So no use pretending that the Doctrine of the Wife advocates male inferiority, or female superiority, because of the idea that a husband should put his judgment below the wife's. A husband who sincerely wants conjugial love, LOVES the idea of him voluntarily putting his judgment below his wife's judgment. He loves that idea because he experiences in that idea the feeling of internal unity, and this is something we can love indeed, once we have a taste of it.

Imagine: we men deny ourselves this exquisite and ecstatic experience. We prefer the arrogant idea of internal equality of the sexes. This is a political requirement, thus for the body and the external mind. All married couples start out in this state, which is called "conjugal" (not conjugial). We can make a great show of friendship and mutual liking in this external conjunction of minds------and then, suddenly one day, the cruel announcement, I hate your guts I want out I love someone else. A little over fifty percent of the marriages end this way, and the rest do not because of the ceaseless loyalty and sweetness of the wives.

I hope the men who read this re-read it after cooling down and begging the Lord to give them enlightenment. This I do myself continuously, for I'm not finished by a long shot. The Lord pleads with us, O Why will yea die, my people. Choose life, and life is conjugial love, and conjugial love is internal unition, and internal unition is the man's understanding united to the wife's will, and the will directs, guides, judges, perceives.

Aloha and Peace,
Leon James

The expression "feminization of the Church" is usually taken in a pejorative sense. We need to reclaim this word in its good sense, and this is done through the Doctrine of the Wife. Through this perspective marriage becomes feminized in the mind of husbands. When this occurs, the feminization of marriage has taken place, and this is synonymous with the sanctification of marriage. Marriage is sanctified by the husband in his internal mind when he acknowledges, confirms, and lives in accordance with the Doctrine of the Wife. Marriage is the state of growth between a wife and a husband. There are two phases to this growth, external and internal, or, growth in the external mind and growth in the internal mind. In the external mind, marriage is masculinized and in society this is equivalent with the notion that this is a 'man's world.' But in the internal phase which comes next, marriage is feminized by the husband through living the Doctrine of the Wife.

The commandment for husbands to "leave mother and father" means to abandon loyalty and love for masculinized truth, and the commandment to "cleave unto the wife" means to conjoin himself in all things with the wife's affections. In this way they achieve the state of "one flesh" which means of one mind, which is the mind of an angel. This is composed of the wife's affections conjoined with the husband's cognitions, thus making one angelic mind out of a man and a woman. This conjoined mind is the highest state provided by the Lord for humans and in this state we are truly human, immortal and in perfect health, ecstatically happy, fully rational, loving and compassionate, creative and skillful to the extreme in all things. This is the angelic state, and it is created when the husband loves his wife's affections and adjusts his own cognitions to harmonize with the wife's affections. This is his striving in feminizing the marriage and which the Lord rewards by creating the perfect angelic mind out of the two imperfect individuals.

The idea that the feminization of marriage is its sanctification may appear surprising at first. Even more surprise is generated if we say that the feminization of the Church is its true and genuine sanctification. We can say in general that the feminization of society is its salvation, and universally we can say that the feminization of the universe is God's plan in creation. You can confirm this principle from many things written in the Writings. Let me mention just a few examples.

Divine Truth of the highest kind is represented by Sarah, Wives, Virgins, and so on. Divine Truth of the lower kind is represented by men, boys, kings, and so on. The Church and the Word  is also represented by women, maidens, brides, and so on. The Word describes women's intelligence as being like the Lord's intelligence--"modest, gracious, peaceable, compliant, soft and gentle," but the intelligence of men is described as "critical, rough, resistant, argumentative, and given to intemperance" (see(CL 218). A man is constructed biologically as the inverse of a woman since woman is interior truth covered over with love while man is love covered over with exterior truth. The Writings also teach that interior is always superior and more spiritual than exterior in all things. Clearly then, a woman's intelligence is more spiritual and celestial than a man's intelligence. But we know that the Lord's purpose in creating and maintaining the universe is to populate the heavens from individuals born on earths. The heavens vary in accordance with genius, that is, distance from the Lord's Mind or Proprium--which is His Character and Personality. Regeneration consists in loosing our own proprium and living as if from the Lord's Proprium. This means abandoning the external masculinized truth and entering existence into the internal feminized truth. The feminized truth is like the truth of the Lord's Own Proprium which we are to take on and in which we are to live. Our affections as husbands must be placed below the affections of our wife because her intelligence is higher than our intelligence and this higher intelligence can conjoin only with feminine affections, not masculine.

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love (CL 187)

"Changes of state are of one kind with men and of another with women, because, by creation, men are forms of science, intelligence, and wisdom, and women, forms of the love of these with men."

Additional passages such as this are quoted a few screens below. (Go there now.)

Passages such as the above are seized upon by our external masculinized mind which wants to hold on to the idea that intelligence is the arena of men while feelings is the arena of women. By this they mean that men are ahead of women in intelligence and wisdom while women are ahead of men in love and affection. In this way they mean to turn the Doctrine of the Wife upside down and make it into a non-genuine union made by man, not by the Lord. The union the man wants to make is the adjunction together of man's intelligence with woman's affectional predisposition. This is not a true marriage and adjunction does not constitute conjunction. The passage above, and all others like it, refer to EXTERNAL states of marriage. Internal states are the reverse, as you can see in this passage.

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love (CL 32)

"(a)The difference essentially consists in this, that the inmost quality in masculinity is love, and its veil wisdom, or in other words, it is love veiled over with wisdom, while the inmost quality in femininity is that same wisdom, the wisdom of masculinity, and its veil the love resulting from it. (b) This second love, however, is a feminine love, and it is given by the Lord to a wife through the wisdom of her husband, whereas that first love is a masculine love, which is a love of becoming wise, and it is given by the Lord to a husband according to his reception of wisdom. (c) Consequently, the male is a form of the wisdom of love, and the female is a form of the love of that wisdom. (d) Therefore from creation there was implanted in both male and female a love of uniting into one. "

This passage has four sentences which I marked from (a) to (d) in order to consider them each in turn. Sentence (a) specifies the "essential" or inmost difference between man and woman. Note that this inmost difference constitutes a union. No union is possible between alike and alike for that yields only an external adjunction or co-location. Note that in order to create a structural union there must be a particular kind of difference or relation, one that functions as a unitary action like the heart and the lungs in the body. Sentence (a) specifies the structural relation in marriage: femininity consists in elevating masculine wisdom from external to internal, or, from natural-rational to spiritual-rational. A wife imbibes and appropriates her husband's wisdom and then elevates it, that is, makes it interior, and covers it over with feminine love. This is stated in sentence (b).

Note this very important observation: In sentence (b) it is said that the Lord gives the wife conjugial love "through the wisdom of her husband." There are two ways of interpreting the meaning. One is that the wisdom mentioned here is the wisdom of the husband such as it is in the husband. But this is not in accord with the Doctrine of the Wife and its rationale. The other possible meaning is that the wisdom of the husband mentioned here refers to the wisdom of the husband the wife has when she imbibes her husband's wisdom. This means that the wife has conjugial love from the Lord when she unites her current wisdom in her (originally from the husband) with harmonious affections also in her, within which is the love from the Lord.

In this second interpretation it is clear that the wife's intelligence and wisdom is more interior than his, even though her wisdom originates from his. But it is given to the wife to elevate that wisdom from the husband within herself by implanting it in her inner mind where it functions at a more interior level than with the husband where it originated from. This interior truth is represented by Sarah, Abraham's wife. It is celestial truth and is such as the highest angels have. Angelic unity of the married couple thus depends on the husband imbibing the wife's affections and the wife imbibing the husband's cognitions. This process changes the cognitions of the husband and the wife as a gradual and endless process of deeper and richer union. This is not a static process. When the husband imbibes the wife's affections, his cognitions must change accordingly. He gains a deeper wisdom than before. When a wife imbibes her husband's cognitions, her affections become more sublime as indicated by greater beauty and more glorious femininity. The more they love each other's reciprocity, the more they conjoin in deeper unity. And this to eternity. What an amazing and wonderful reality! This is indicated in sentence (d).

Sentence (b) also states that the Lord gives the husband wisdom according to his "reception" of wisdom. What is the measure of his reception? Not his knowledge and intelligence, but the life he conducts according to these. Which means the kind of affections he favors. The Lord is instructing us that if we husbands favor the affections of our wife, then it means that we are receptive of His wisdom. Then He can give us that wisdom, and more of it. We become more wise as a husband only by living what we know, and this means doing the work of charity, starting especially with the wife, who is the neighbor in the first place, before all other neighbors. By loving the affections of our wife, affections which she has from the Lord, we are living what we know and understand from the Word. We are then receptive to the Lord's wisdom. As we receive deeper wisdom from the Lord, our wife imbibes it, elevates it in her interior mind, and receives new deeper and more genuine conjugial love from the Lord. The husband now can imbibe her new affections--and the cycle of union continues to grow forever.

To imbibe the wife's affections and to favor them means that the husband must never disagree and always agree with his wife's requests in all things.

See also The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband

4. Heresies Regarding the Husband's Wisdom

The Writings of Swedenborg (1688-1771) contain the greatest scientific revelations ever made to humankind. The center of these revelations is that human emotions and feelings are arranged in a hierarchy from strongest to weakest, and the strongest at the very top is the intense desire to unite in marriage. This state of inner unition between a husband and a wife is the complete and pure human state of life. It is the angelic life of couplehood. This is the life Swedenborg witnessed with thousands of couples with whom he interacted in the spiritual world called the heavens. The married couple is organically united in their spirit body or mind exactly like newly born Siamese twins who are physically joined in the body. The mental state of unition is so real in the afterlife world that married partners appear as one angel from a distance, but then appear as husband and wife when approached by Swedenborg. Without knowing this reality, an inner union between husband and wife cannot be achieved on a conscious basis. Perhaps it can happen at the unconscious level, I don't know. But now look at this:

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love

168. (10) This perception is a wisdom that the wife has. A man is not capable of it, neither is a wife capable of her husband's intellectual wisdom. This follows from the difference that exists between masculinity and femininity. It is masculine to perceive from the intellect, and feminine to perceive from love. Moreover, the intellect also perceives those sorts of matters which transcend the body and the world - it being the nature of intellectual and spiritual sight to move in that direction - while love does not perceive beyond what it feels. When it does, its perception draws on its union with the intellect of a man, a union established from creation. For the intellect has to do with light, and love with warmth, and concerns that are matters of light are seen, whereas concerns that are matters of warmth are felt. It is apparent from this that, because of the universal difference which exists between masculinity and femininity, a husband is not capable of his wife's wisdom, nor is a wife capable of her husband's wisdom. Women are not even capable of a man's moral wisdom to the extent that it springs from his intellectual wisdom.

174. (16) A husband has duties appropriate to him, and a wife duties appropriate to her, and a wife cannot enter into duties appropriate to her husband or a husband into duties appropriate to his wife and perform them properly. There is no need to illustrate by recounting them that there are duties appropriate to a husband and duties appropriate to a wife, for these are many and various in nature. Moreover, everyone knows how to divide them into their categories according to their general and specific kinds, provided he directs his mind to seeing the difference between them. Duties by which wives especially unite themselves with their husbands are duties involved in the upbringing of little children of both sexes, and of girls to the age when they are given in marriage.

175 [2] Many people believe that women can perform the duties of men if only they are introduced into them from early age in the way that boys are. However, women can be introduced into the exercise of these duties, but not into the judgment on which the proper performance of these duties inwardly depends. Therefore, those women who are introduced into the duties of men, in matters of judgment are bound to go to men for advice; and then, from the men's recommendations, if they are their own mistresses, they choose what accords with their love. [3] Some people also suppose that women can raise the sight of their understanding into the same realm of light that men can and see things on the same high level. They have been persuaded of this opinion by what some educated female poets have written. But when the works of these female poets were examined in their presence in the spiritual world, they were found to be works, not of judgment and wisdom, but of cleverness and a facility in the use of language. And works which result from these two gifts, because of the elegance and skill in the way the words are put together, appear as though they were lofty and intelligent - but only to people who take any kind of cleverness and call it wisdom. [4] We also say that men cannot enter into duties appropriate to women and perform them properly, because they cannot enter into the affections of women, which are completely different from the affections of men. Since the affections and perceptions of the male sex, from creation and thus by nature, have been made so different, therefore the laws among the children of Israel also included the following decree:

A woman shall not have on the garment of a man, nor a man the garment of a woman, for it is an abomination.... (Deuteronomy 22:5)

177. (18) According as the aforementioned conjunctions are formed, married partners become more and more one person. This accords with the observations contained in point (6), where we explained that the union takes place gradually from the first days of marriage, and that in people who are in a state of truly conjugial love, it becomes deeper and deeper to eternity. See what was said there. Married partners become proportionately one person in the measure that their conjugial love grows. And because, in heaven, this love is genuine, owing to the celestial and spiritual life of the angels, therefore two married partners there are called two when they are referred to as husband and wife, but one when they are referred to as angels.

The above passages clearly show that a union is necessary for the husband to be whole, or for the wife to be whole. The two are singly incomplete, the man lacking the love his understanding needs to be whole, and the wife lacking the understanding her love needs. There is a temptation for husbands to read the above passage and conclude that men are superior to women in understanding the things of everyday life. This I call a doctrinal heresy and the husband must let go of this persuasion, or fail in his attempt to regenerate and become an angel. (See this article for heresies in the New Church)

A sermon by Rev. Geoffrey H. Howard titled "The Transformation of a Man into a Husband and a Woman into a Wife through Marriage" appeared in New Church Life, June 2001 issue, pages 243-248. I will use this sermon to illustrate some doctrinal issues in relation to the Doctrine of the Wife. The point I wish to make is that the literal of the Writings can lead to misconceptions unless contextualized in relation to the Doctrine of the Wife. In other words, articulating the Doctrine of the Wife and applying it to interpret the literal of the Writings avoids the heresy of believing that men are superior to women due to men's wisdom which women cannot have. I believe that this heresy cannot be avoided without the Doctrine of the Wife.

First I note that it is customary to make a statement of denial in relation to the heresy of the superiority of men over women in relation to wisdom. For instance, Rev. Howard states: "It is important to take teachings such as these in their proper context. Some have read into such teachings in Conjugial Love the erroneous notion that masculine virtues are extolled over those of the feminine. Nothing could be further from the truth" (p.244). Nevertheless, this denial appears perfunctory or a mere outward declaration when we examine how this apparent paradox is to be resolved. The apparent paradox is that portions of the literal of the Writings appear to suggest that men are superior to women with respect to wisdom. Rev. Howard refers to some of these, e.g.:

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love

32. (2) A male is then still a male, and a female still a female. Since a person lives as a person after death, and people are male and female, and since it is one thing to be masculine and another to be feminine, with the two qualities being so different that one cannot be converted into the other, it follows that after death a male still lives as a male and a female still lives as a female, each of them being a spiritual person.

We say that masculinity cannot be converted into femininity, nor femininity into masculinity, and that after death a male is consequently still a male, and a female still a female. But because people do not know what masculinity consists in essentially, and what femininity consists in essentially, therefore we must say a few words about it here.

The difference essentially consists in this, that the inmost quality in masculinity is love, and its veil wisdom, or in other words, it is love veiled over with wisdom, while the inmost quality in femininity is that same wisdom, the wisdom of masculinity, and its veil the love resulting from it. This second love, however, is a feminine love, and it is given by the Lord to a wife through the wisdom of her husband, whereas that first love is a masculine love, which is a love of becoming wise, and it is given by the Lord to a husband according to his reception of wisdom. Consequently, the male is a form of the wisdom of love, and the female is a form of the love of that wisdom. Therefore from creation there was implanted in both male and female a love of uniting into one. But more on this subject will be said later.

Testimony that femininity is derived from masculinity, or that woman was taken out of man, appears from these verses in Genesis:

Jehovah God...took one of the ribs of the man, and closed up the flesh in its place. And the rib which He had taken from man He fashioned into a woman, and He brought her to the man. And the man said: "She is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. Therefore she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." (Genesis 2:21-23)

Rev. Howard concludes: "From this we can see that the reception of masculine wisdom depends upon a man's willingness to look to the Lord and shun as sins against the Lord the evils that may tempt him. Thus we can see that a man does not automatically receive wisdom because he is a male. He receives it only by honoring the Lord through living according to His commandments."

This is true. But we need to look at this closely for a serpent may lie hidden under it, like a rock in the desert. We must inquire into this and make it clear: How does a man live according to the Lord's commandments? One might think at first blush that the man has that power from the Lord independently of his wife. Can a husband live according to the Lord's commandments from his efforts apart from the wife or only through his wife? Could it be that the husband cannot follow the Lord's commandments unless he does so through his wife? This would appear to be so when considering Rev. Howard's description of the wife:  "A woman too is born with the potential for receiving wisdom, but in her case the wisdom she receives partakes more of love and of perception. She is gifted with the potential of elevating her will into the heat of heaven above what is possible with men" (p.245).

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love

168. (10) This perception is a wisdom that the wife has. A man is not capable of it, neither is a wife capable of her husband's intellectual wisdom. This follows from the difference that exists between masculinity and femininity. It is masculine to perceive from the intellect, and feminine to perceive from love. Moreover, the intellect also perceives those sorts of matters which transcend the body and the world - it being the nature of intellectual and spiritual sight to move in that direction - while love does not perceive beyond what it feels. When it does, its perception draws on its union with the intellect of a man, a union established from creation. For the intellect has to do with light, and love with warmth, and concerns that are matters of light are seen, whereas concerns that are matters of warmth are felt.

It is apparent from this that, because of the universal difference which exists between masculinity and femininity, a husband is not capable of his wife's wisdom, nor is a wife capable of her husband's wisdom. Women are not even capable of a man's moral wisdom to the extent that it springs from his intellectual wisdom.

Rev. Howard: "Feminine wisdom, or perception, does not easily lend itself to description because it is of a more interior nature than is the wisdom given to a man" (...) They are entirely different in quality and nature, yet complementary to each other" (p.245).

This is true, and yet there is a temptation hidden in it. It seems to me that it is not enough to say (a) that masculine and feminine wisdom are different; and (b) that they are complementary. This is not enough. A conclusion must follow: (c) Therefore the husband should elevate the wife's judgment above his own. This is the Doctrine of the Wife.

Without this conclusion, the literal of the Writings is misperceived. The husband's wisdom may indeed be elevated even to the highest heaven, but he cannot appropriate it to himself. His wisdom falls back quickly to the level of his affections, which are in hell. The Writings make this comparison: "He is also like an adulterer who hides a harlot in a room below, and in turn ascends to the highest story of his house, and there in the presence of his wife talks wisely with visitors about chastity, and again steals away from the company and satiates his lust with the harlot below" (TCR 590). This comparison is said about every husband. Husbands can elevate their intellect into doctrinal things of the Word while they are studying and applying themselves piously. Then they descend from the lofty heights and interact with their wife, abusing them, discounting their intellect, holding the wife's judgment as nothing in comparison to their own. And this is done repeatedly, daily. Thus there is no regeneration possible for them.

Rev. Howard: "No wife can love a proud or conceited husband. (...) The attraction he feels [as he is drawn to her by love] has the effect of subduing his proprial pride. (...) Through the influence of her love his mind becomes elevated and aspires to a new idealism that no longer looks inward. He feels an incentive to live in a manner worthy of her love and respect. Through her influence he is withdrawn from his fallen proprium. By living a principled life of service to his wife, family and others, he begins to receive a degree of wisdom which will draw the affections of his wife" (p.247).

This is certainly true. And yet there is danger lurking in this truth that needs to be addressed by every husband. The above description is standard fair for what is called BROWN temptations (see part 2). Note what the paragraph says: the husband aspires to a new idealism as he strives to become worthy of her love and respect. Through this process he enlarges or deepens his wisdom, and this will draw his wife's affections to him. And then he can continue a new round, ever higher or deeper into conjugial love and unity. To me this seems to leave the main point unattended, which is that husbands CANNOT improve their wisdom through this process of self-motivated desire to be worthy of their wife's still greater love. This is not possible, no more than the proverbial lifting yourself through the boot straps.

The only way a husband can improve his wisdom is by elevating his wife's judgment above his own. This is the Doctrine of the Wife. Clearly the wife's wisdom is higher and superior to the husband's wisdom. This is not recognized by Rev. Howard, as can be seen from this:  "A husband is totally dependent upon the wife for love. Apart from feminine love, men feel little inspiration to seek things of wisdom." This is another standard version of BROWN temptations, described in Part 2. In this mental state wives are relegated to a ceremonious role, yes an essential role it is declared, but still not a central role, still not a PRIMARY role. This is refused by the husband. The husband will acknowledge that the wife has an essential role to play in the union. And this role is relegated to the "affectional side" of things. Here, Rev. Howard says "dependent on the wife for love" and "inspired by the wife to new heights of wisdom" etc. The central fact remains: It is believed that the husband improves and grows in his wisdom from the Lord in accordance with his "following the commandments."

It is believed that if the husband applies himself to following the commandments, his wisdom will grow from the Lord, and the wife will be able to love his wisdom even more, and thus the couple is conjoined. But this is the WRONG order! It is NOT the case that the husband gains wisdom implanted from the Lord BY HIMSELF, that is, apart from his wife, through his own independent effort and striving to follow the Lord's commandments. This is a FANTASY as I have discovered.

There is only one way the husband can grow in wisdom, and that is through receiving it from the Lord. True. But the Lord can only give as much as the husband can receive--this is recognized by everyone. Hence the question is: When can the husband receive more interior truths or deeper wisdom from the Lord? NOT as he strives independently to follow the Lord's commandments and receiving deeper wisdom which she can then love and conjoin with. There is no deeper wisdom for her to conjoin with just because the husband strives to improve by following the commandments. Striving to improve is not sufficient for the husband to receive more interior truths from the Lord. Why? Because this striving is from his proprium. His only salvation is to love the wife's judgment above his own, to love the wife's wisdom above his own. This is the Doctrine of the Wife.

Finally, Rev. Howard writes: "Rational wisdom, on the other hand, is gained through study and application to intellectual pursuits. These have the effect of elevating the mind of a husband into higher light" (p.248).

I have discovered that rational wisdom does not develop in this way because such study and scholarship only yields knowledges and scientifics about the literal of the Word. Instead, rational wisdom develops as the husband DRAWS OUT or EXTRACTS doctrine from the literal through enlightenment or illustration from the Lord (see this article on De Hemelsche Leer). It is shown in the article that this illustration is proportional to the husband's willingness to undergo spiritual and celestial temptations. These temptations cannot be undergone by the husband alone, but only through the wife, and only to the extent that one favors the wife's wisdom over one's own. This doesn't mean that the wife knows more than the husband about doctrinal things and so the husband takes lessons from the wife. It means that whatever doctrine the husband can extract from the literal, his understanding of it, and then his life according to it, is proportional to his seeing the doctrine in himself, in his life. This is the essence of illustration. For a husband, his wife is the all in all of his temptations, hence of his regeneration and salvation.

The Doctrine of the Wife explains many things about marriage taken from the Writings of Swedenborg.

From Swedenborg's Heaven and Hell

HH 369. Everyone, man or woman, enjoys understanding and will; but with the man the understanding predominates, and with the woman the will predominates, and the character is determined by that which predominates. Yet in marriages in the heavens there is no predominance; for the will of the wife is also the husband's will, and the understanding of the husband is also the wife's understanding, since each loves to will and think as the other, that is, mutually and reciprocally. Thus are they conjoined into one. This is actual conjunction, for the will of the wife enters into the understanding of the husband, and the understanding of the husband into the will of the wife, and this especially when they look into one another's faces . . . . From all this it can be established what the conjunction of minds is that makes marriage and produces conjugial love in the heavens, namely, that one wishes what is his own to be the other's, and this reciprocally.

5. The Role of the Wife in the Husband's Wisdom

From Swedenborg's Conjugial Love

293. To this I will append two narrative accounts. Here is the first:

I once looked out my window toward the east and saw seven women sitting next to a rose garden by a spring drinking water. I strained my eyes intently to see what they were doing, and the intensity of my gaze caught their attention. With a motion of the head one of them therefore invited me over. Accordingly I left the house and hurried in their direction. And when I arrived, I politely asked them where they were from.

They then said, "We are wives. We are talking here about the delights of conjugial love, and we have concluded from a good deal of evidence that these delights are also delights of wisdom."

This response so delighted my heart that I seemed to be more interiorly in the spirit and to have on that account a more enlightened perception than ever before. So I said to them, "Permit me an opportunity to ask you some questions about those pleasant delights." And they nodded their assent.

So I asked, "How do you wives know that the delights of conjugial love are at the same time delights of wisdom?"

[2] They then replied, "We know it from the correspondence that exists between wisdom in our husbands and the delights of conjugial love in us. For the delights of this love in us heighten or diminish and take on altogether different qualities according to the wisdom in our husbands."

On hearing this I inquired further, saying, "I know you are affected by gentle words from your husbands and cheerful states of mind on their part, and that you take delight on account of these with all your heart. But I wonder at your saying that it is in response to their wisdom. However, tell me what wisdom is and what sort of wisdom you mean."

[3] To this the wives replied with annoyance, "You think we do not know what wisdom is and what sort of wisdom we mean, even though we continually reflect on it in our husbands and daily learn it from their mouths. Indeed, we wives think about the state of our husbands from morning to evening, with scarcely any time intervening in a day when this is interrupted or in which our instinctive thought is entirely withdrawn or gone from them. Our husbands in contrast spend very little time in the course of a day thinking about our state. As a result we know what sort of wisdom in them finds delight in us. Our husbands call this wisdom a spiritual-rational wisdom and a spiritual-moral one. Spiritual-rational wisdom, they say, is a matter of the intellect and its intellectual concepts, while spiritual-moral wisdom is a matter of the will and its mode of life. Yet they join the two together and regard them as one; and they maintain that the pleasant delights of this wisdom are transposed from their minds into delights in our hearts, and from our hearts back to their hearts, so that these return to the wisdom from which they originated."

[4] I then asked whether they knew anything more about this wisdom in their husbands - "wisdom," I said, "which finds delight in you."

"We do," they said. "It is a spiritual wisdom, and from that a rational and moral one. Spiritual wisdom is to acknowledge the Lord our Savior as God of heaven and earth, and through the Word and discourses from it to acquire from Him truths connected with the Church, from which comes a spiritual rationality; and in addition to live from Him according to those truths, from which comes a spiritual morality. Our husbands call these two the wisdom which in general works to produce truly conjugial love. We have also heard from them the reason, namely, that this wisdom opens the inner faculties of their mind and thus of their body, providing free passage from the firsts to the last of these for the stream of love, on whose flow, sufficiency and strength conjugial love depends for its existence and life.

"As regards marriage in particular, the spiritual-rational and spiritual-moral wisdom of our husbands has as its end and goal to love only their wives and to rid themselves of all desire for other women. Moreover, to the extent they achieve this, to that extent that love is heightened in degree and perfected in quality, and the more clearly and keenly do we then feel matching delights in us corresponding to the contented pleasures of our husbands' affections and the pleasant exaltations of their thoughts."

[5] I asked them next whether they knew how the communication took place.

They said, "All conjunction by love requires action, reception, and reaction. The state of our love and its delights is the agent or that which acts. The state of our husbands' wisdom is the recipient or that which receives. And this same wisdom is also the reagent or that which reacts in accordance with their reception. This reaction is then perceived by us with feelings of delight in our hearts according to our state and the measure in which it is continually open and ready to receive those elements which in some way are connected with and so emanate from virtue in our husbands, thus which in some way are connected with and so emanate from the final state of love in us."

At that point they also inserted, "Take care you do not interpret the delights we have mentioned to mean the end delights of conjugial love. We never talk about these, but only about the delights of our hearts which constantly correspond to the state of wisdom in our husbands."

[6] After that there appeared in the distance what looked like a dove in flight with a leaf from a tree in its mouth; but as it drew near, instead of a dove we saw a little boy with a piece of paper in his hand. Coming over to us then, he held it out to me and said, "Read it in the presence of these maidens of the spring."

So I read the following:

Tell the inhabitants of the earth among whom you live that there is such a thing as truly conjugial love, offering a million delights scarcely any of which are yet known to the world. But they will be discovered when the church betroths itself to her Lord and becomes His bride and wife.

Then I asked the wives, "Why did the boy call you 'maidens of the spring'?"

"We are called maidens when we sit by this spring," they replied, "because we are forms of affection for the truths of our husbands' wisdom; and an affection for truth in form is termed a maiden. The spring likewise symbolizes the truth of wisdom, and the rose garden we are sitting next to its delights."

[7] One of the seven wives then wove a garland of roses; and sprinkling it with water from the spring, she placed it over the cap the boy had on, fitting it around his little head and saying, "Receive the delights of intelligence. Your cap, you see, symbolizes intelligence, and the garland from this rose garden its delights."

Thus adorned the boy then departed, and in the distance he looked once more like a dove in flight, but this time with a little crown on its head.

294. The second account:

Several days later I again saw the same seven wives in a rose garden, but in a different one from the one previously. It was a magnificent garden, the like of which I had never seen before. It was laid out almost in a circle, and the roses in it formed a kind of rainbow-like arc. Purple-colored roses or flowers formed its outmost ring; golden-yellow ones the next ring in; dark-blue ones the ring inside that; and bluish-green or bright-green ones the inmost ring. And enclosed within that rainbow-like rose garden was a little pool of clear water.

Those seven wives, previously called maidens of the spring, were sitting there, and seeing me at my window they again called me over. Then, when I arrived, they said, "Have you ever seen anything more beautiful on earth?"

"Never," I said.

So they said, "A marvel like this is created by the Lord in instant, and it represents a new development on earth, for everything created by the Lord represents something. But divine if you can what that is. We are guessing that it is the delights of conjugial love."

[2] On hearing this I said, "What are the delights of conjugial love, of which you spoke with so much wisdom and also so much eloquence last time? After I left you, I related what you said to wives living in our world, and I told them, 'Having now been instructed, I know that you feel delights in your hearts arising from your conjugial love, which you are able to communicate to your husbands in accordance with their wisdom. I also know that from morning to evening you therefore continually contemplate your husbands with the eyes of your spirit and consider how to turn and guide their hearts to becoming wise, in order that you may realize those delights.' I further reported what you meant by wisdom, saying that it is a spiritual-rational and spiritual-moral wisdom, and that as regards marriage it is to love only one's wife and to rid oneself of all desire for other women.

"But to this the wives in our world responded with laughter, saying, 'What are you talking about? What you have said is preposterous. We do not know what conjugial love is. If our husbands experience anything of it, still we do not. How then do its delights originate with us? Indeed, when it comes to the delights which you call the end delights, we sometimes resist vehemently, for to us they are repugnant, in almost the same way as acts of rape. In fact, if you look, you will not see one sign of any such love in our faces. Therefore you are either talking nonsense or joking if, like those seven wives of yours, you too say that we think about our husbands from morning to evening and continually give attention to their wishes and pleasures, in order that we may gain from them delights such as those!'

"I have retained from the responses of those wives these declarations, to report them to you, since they call into dispute and even more entirely contradict the discourse I heard from you by the spring, which I listened to so eagerly and also believed."

[3] To this the wives sitting in the rose garden replied, "Dear friend, you do not know the wisdom and prudence of wives, because they hide it altogether from men and keep it hidden precisely in order to be loved by them. For every man who is not spiritually rational and moral but only naturally so possesses a coldness towards his wife, such a coldness being inherent in him in his inmost elements. This coldness a wise and prudent wife acutely and keenly notices, and she then conceals her conjugial love, withdrawing into her heart so much of it and hiding it there so deeply that not the least bit of it appears in her face, her tone of voice, or gesture. She does this, because to the extent her love appears, to that extent a man's coldness with respect to