YoonWhan Cho's Weekly Internet Report #8

Welcome to YoonWhan Cho's
Week# 8 Report

Exploring Generation One Cybercommunity: Part 2.

Oct. 11th, 1995

YoonWhan Cho

Psy409

Dr. Leon James

How difficult was this week's task (lumping all the sub-tasks together)? circle one.

Very easy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Very hard

This week's rating=9

How much negative emotions did it cost you, all in all?

Very little 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Very much

This week's rating=8

How valuable for later use is this knowledge or skill going to be for you?

Not useful 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Very useful

This week's rating=10

How likely is it that you'll be getting good at this week's tasks?

Not likely 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Quite likely

This week's rating=8

How satisfied are you with the computer and Internet systems?

Not satisfied 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Very satisfied

This week's rating=8

How hard did you try to get through this week's tasks?

Gave up easily 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Refused to give up

This week's rating=9

DELLIA BADUA'S WORK

This was the second part of the journey to the Generation One Cybercommunity. I was for sure less anxious about the journey and maybe less excited about it. However, I continued my journey with on focus on my mind... "taking an objective perspective. " As I mentioned in my Week#7 report, I needed to be objective as possible to observe myself learning in the Net. However, I knew that it is not going to be easy.

My journey began with the home page of Dellia Badua. I thought that she did a fairly good job with topical index. She only used simple images and focused on the contents of topical index. I could see that she contemplated about choosing words for each topic. I thought it was really smart of her to use only short adjectives and nouns for the name of the topics and attracted the readers with the curiosity about what the content would be like. For example, words like confident, frustration, or finally seemed to give an idea about the content but still looked mysterious so that it looked interesting. I have seen many works that main contents had categorized names and they were divided into different parts like weeks and also topics. I thought Dellia Badua's work is one of them.

Concerning the appearance, Dellia Bauda's work is simple but very eye-gazing. I really liked her icons, especially bullets in many different colors. The simplicity was powerful enough to draw people's eyes. I wrote down the name of some icons so tha t I can use some of them to beautify my pages. Her style reminded me of "Hypercard," which is a program that gives a random access to information with table of contents and clickable icons like "forward," and "backward." What I mean is she always gave t he reader the choice to whether to keep reading the document or to stop and try read another document. It was very kind of her to put clickable icons that gives choice to the readers.

There were two people who made the letters of weekly reports larger so that it is easier to read. They are Dellia Badua and Jason Raad. I thought in style or appearance it doesn't seem to look good but it surely was easy to read. But Jason Raad's ho me page was missing something very important. It was topical index. Even though he has done a good job with content and appearance, it was his big mistake to forget to put topical index. He surely reminded of me the importance of the topical index. Th e disadvantage of not having a topical index is like not knowing where to go. It felt like lost in the middle of great amount of books without titles and divided sections to tell where and how to find book that I want.

Another mistake by Jason Raad made me think about the importance of giving a right name to right report. I mean, some of his topic names he only added to report itself were not proper... (Although he didn't have a topical index, he had a topic names o r subheadings for each lab reports. did I tell you about it? I guess not.) It seemed like in some of them his topic names and contents were not compatible. For example, in one of his topics called "Webcrawler," it seems like the focus of document is s omething else but he named it, "Webcrawler."

Again, it was important to name the right document with right topic.

JASON RAAD'S WORK

Meanwhile, Jason Raad's appearance of home page was kind of neat. Because the icons he used were more like to emphasize the title of each lab report. "Mr.Smiley button" image that he attached to each weekly lab report looked impressive and even the s ynopses that he added to them also looked impressive. I don't know why simple repetition of an icon could create a powerful effect. I guess there's something wrong with me. ANYWAY, I liked them.

BEVERLY DIAZ'S WORK

Talking about picture and image in its style, I personally liked Beverly Diaz's home page. With nice picture and image, she did a nice job with home page content. Especially, synapses of lab report shown in home page was very effective to tell what t he report is about. The words were not wasted. But it was hard to find topical index. First, I thought she doesn't have topical index but I found it in the middle of document. Anyway, I clicked it and there came up a list. But there was no category i n it so it was kind of hard to figure out what's what. I thought it would have been much better if there was a category or themes to bind related documents in an organized manner. I thought it was kind of random.

NICOLE GUSTIE'S WORK

One impressive topical index was in Nicole Gustie's home page. Even though she had no, no graphic at all, it was really fun to read the names for each topic. It was like title of soap opera and very implicit in its meaning. For example, "Thanks God for classmates" or "where am I?" sounded witty to me. Also one cool link called "latest useless stuff" was awesome.

KYLE FUJII'S WORK

I thought the content of lab report by Kyle Fujii was very detail in a way to explain each step he followed. He included emotional reaction to each topics and it was very easy to understand what he was going through. He also had bookmark section whic h made me think to include in mine, too. He didn't have any, any graphics at all. I thought it was kind of boring but he surely made that up with interesting reports. I thought the focus to be objective in observation was also important to him because he was very sensitive about what's going on during using Internet and described situations well.

AFTERTHOUGHT

I could see myself making a fossilized error with reading documents from Generation One that I kept forgetting that I was supposed to see myself as the learning happened. In Part2, I also was not successful in observation of myself. I felt lacunae about my fossilized error that is related to my failure to remind me during the learning process. I think it applies to my previous errors, too. In both cognitive and affective domain of learning in Internet, I need to keep in mind all those knowledge and skills that I have learned. Can I learn to do this without reminding myself as if it just comes out from me naturally. Maybe, to do that, I still need to keep working on with trial and error. However, it is fortunate for me to know that I surely have a will to persist.

Wanna leave a message for YoonWhan Cho?