To avoid the threat of putting other individuals at risk,
Bryan Yucoco (Generation 2)
believes that people should change these behaviors by implementing a Driving
Personality Makeover plan. Implementing a Driving Personality Makeover Plan,
gives that individual a sense of control in something in their life in which
they previously thought that they had no control over and was at the mercy
of fate. A Driving Personality Makeover Plan according to
Angie L. Inouye (Generation
3), is an attempt to change an undesired behavior before this behavior
escalates and becomes a health-threatening hazard to you, someone you love,
or some poor unsuspecting individual. Individuals often get into accidents
because they feel that they could save a couple of seconds by speeding or
driving recklessly. Unfortunately, all these individual's actions end up
doing is delaying them from their destination by putting them at a greater
risk of getting them into an accident or permanently delaying themselves or
another individual from arriving at their destination.
I agree with
Denise Tanaka (Generation 2) when she states that people should do a
Driving Personality Makeover because this prevents accidents from
occurring and individuals from getting hurt. She states that one small
thing would piss her off, and then she would start to drive a little
recklessly, venting off steam. Next, another thing would compound the
problem, then another and another until she finds herself performing
unsafe behavior. She also mentions that drivers may actually feed off the
negative emotions from other drivers who perform reckless behavior. It
may begin with one individual innocently switching lanes without
signaling, the driver in back in turn becomes
upset and starts to tailgate. The tailgating driver may be forced to
stop all of a sudden and then the driver in back of him, may have to
switch lanes without looking to avoid an accident, and in the process
barley hit a couple of cars. While the drivers
of the cars almost involved in the accident yell and give each
other the finger, they may not watch where they are heading and hit a
pedestrian or another car and cause injury or death.
Secondly, according to
Cynthia Yap (Generation 2), the individual must then make and carry
out a plan to change the undesired behavior. You must set up a goal, and
set out to accomplish it. You could do one of two things to accomplish
this goal. The first is to gradually,
step by step work up to change the undesired behavior. To do this you
could use operant conditioning, using positive reinforcers to gradually
reinforce and change the undesired behavior in the right direction. To
accomplish this, you must first set up smaller sub-goals on
your way to changing your undesired behavior. After
you accomplish each sub-goal, reward yourself and slowly work toward the
next sub-goal and the next one until you finally accomplish your final
goal of changing your undesired behavior.
Secondly you could use classical conditioning like how
Sherman Lee (Generation 3) did to associate an undesired behavior, his
tailgating behavior with a pinch, or how Noreen Dorion (Generation 3) associated her
undesired swearing, with a rubber band and pain.
The information stored in the Generational
Curriculum Archives, provides a lot of detailed information in
addition to a lot of inspiration for those who wish to proceed with
their own Driving Personality Makeover. The archives contain numerous
stories about student's personal attempts at a Driving Personality
Makeover, as well as moral support for those who are still reluctant to
try it.
Many individuals may still show resistance to a
Driving
Personality Makeover because they feel that their actions do not
seriously
affect those around them. But according to Shane
Akagi (Generation 1) everyone's actions from formatting
a disk to
changing lanes without signaling to tailgating someone affects others
whether we know it or not. People get upset when we unconsciously change
lanes without signaling because other drivers are forced to jerk their
steering wheel suddenly to avoid an accident
which in turn may actually cause an accident. Or when the
Sunday driver in front of us decides that 30 miles per hour is way to fast
on the freeway and suddenly decides to hit the brakes, our switching lanes
and acceleration past this vehicle may
cause those on the side of us and those in the back of us to hit
one another. As
Conrad Moreno (Generation 3) states, he once thought, like many of you
out there, that I am an excellent driver, or that I have no bad driving
habits, but know that everyone has at least one undesirable driving
habit which they should change, and the sooner they do it the
better. I agree with
Claudia Kaneshiro (Generation 1), when she states
individuals should do a Driving Personality Makeover because like her,
she has shown postitive changes after starting a D.P.M.
The advantage of using the Generational
Curriculum Archives, was that it was a fast and relatively easy way to
access information about former students reports in just seconds,
versus conventional library research of looking up research material which
could take a couple of hours to accomplish. Reading these past students'
reports, gave me a better sense of what these students felt and thought
when they were doing their Driving Personality
Makeovers and gives someone a preview of what to expect if
they were to carry out a Driving Personality Makeover. Another benefit of
learning about traffic psychology on the internet is that if one has
questions or desires clarification about
something written in the archives, one could e-mail the author.
But the disadvantage to this is that the author does not have to reply
to one's e-mail and the use of a computer to do one's work becomes a
little stressful, especially if one has limited access to a computer
outside of school, or if one does not have
a modem. Also, a further disadvantage to this type of learning compared
with a regular psychology class is that one losses the human interaction
with the professor teaching the course. If a student needs a question
clarified, all they have to do is ask or see the professor
after class. Unfortunately with the computer, a
reply to a question is usually delayed if asking by e-mail, if at all
responded to.
I was surprised that the Generational
Curriculum Archives even existed. Who would have imagined that there
is a place somewhere out there were past student's reports and works
are saved relatively permanently and for everyone to view when they
desire. I think this gives students a sense of accomplishment that their
work is good enough to be posted somewhere where millions of people could
view it if they wish. I also support the
idea that future generations are required to maintain and upgrade the
archives, because this further pushes the learning and creative abilities
of students. Furthermore, a sense of accomplishment comes over me as I
see my work posted on the World Wide Web, knowing that
many more besides my instructor will be reading these
very words.
I support the continuation of the
Generational Curriculum, like Rudolph
Dolfo (Generation 3a) when he states
that computer skills learned through this class allow them to be better
confident and better equipped to face the future. A reason for this is
because it allows students to challenge themselves
and explore a whole new world which many of us did not even know existed.
But what I think future generations and Dr. James could do to make
this class a little easier it for our instructor to assign a class to do a
project which everyone gets together and gives input on "The basics
one needs to know in order to survive in this course". The project
would include the very basics from how to make links, to setting up a
home-page, to e-mailing. I think that
this should be done so that when future generations enroll in Dr. James's
course, they could read this document the first day of class and this
document could serve as a supplement to Dr. Jame's class
lectures and as a reference.
The reason I
would like single reference page which the class as a group constructs
instead of hundreds of individual pages giving advice is because when a
student needs a question answered they could just turn to one source and
all of their questions could be answered, instead of the students
searching through hundreds of
reports just for one answer. Also I would be in favor of a group report
like this because personally, as a student who did not know anything about
the internet and how to do most of these things,
I barely understood Dr. James when he went over most of
his instructions in class because he used terminology which he expected
many of us to already know. This report by students would serve to
supplement the gaps which Dr. James assumes we already know,
and because the students who are writing the report also
started off knowing little or nothing about the internet, they would have
an easier time explaining these same ideas and concepts to future
generations.
Within a couple of years the Generational
Curriculum Archives , would probably have grown exponentially.
Universities may even offer courses like this via the internet, so you
could attend a school like the University of Hawaii and take another
course in another school, thousands of miles away. One would not have to
travel thousands of miles or pay tens of thousands of dollars to attend an
ivy league school, they could even at tend a community college and yet
still receive the same instruction and
caliber of instruction at a school such as Princeton, Harvard, or Yale.
In addition to posting one's reports so millions could view it, these
students would also have something to look back on when they are
in their 30's, 40's, 50's, and beyond. These
reports would serve as a reminder, reminding them of at least one semester
back in college, the late nights on the computer terminal typing one's
report, the strained eyes, burning the midnight oil, the
nonfunctioning aching brain calling for more aspirin,
and the frustration of trying to type something, and post it up, before
the midnight deadline.